现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2025-07-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-07-23

Анотація

仅有约10%的用户投注资金在500美元以上,内卷程度仍不高。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Golem(@web3_golem

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

7 月 22 日,据知情人士透露,加密预测市场平台 Polymarket 正在评估推出自有稳定币的可能性,目的是掌控由 Circle 的 USDC 支撑的高额储备资金所带来的收益。虽然 Polymarket 官方并未做出最终决定,但结合近期美国司法部结束对 Polymarket 的调查及该平台完成对美国合规交易平台 QCX 的收购等一系列动作,许多用户猜测 Polymarket 发币也在路上,于是又加紧了交互的频率。

Polymarket 将要发币的传闻从 2024 年提及,以至于已经有工作室批量交互了长达一年时间。那么,如果作为此前从未交互过 Polymarket 或频率较低的用户,现在开始撸 Polymarket 还有必要并且来得及吗?

美国大选后Polymarket 平台依旧具有竞争力

在考虑现在开始交互 Polymarket 是否来得及之前,我们要先了解 Polymarket 目前平台的运营情况。Polymarket 的火爆源自于 2024 年美国总统大选,因成功预测特朗普胜选及期间高达 80 亿美元的投注资金而名声鹤起。不过自从美国大选结束后,Polymarket 在媒体上被提及的次数开始下降,因此有观点认为失去美国大选这个预测话题后,Polymarket 用户将大量流失。但事实可能会让他们失望,以下从数据角度揭示了在美国大选炒作过后及政治领域之外,Polymarket 仍是一个日处理数 10 万笔交易、每天服务数万用户的热门平台。

日钱包活跃数

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

据 Dune 数据,从 2024 年 5 月开始,Polymarket 日钱包活跃数经历半年时间几乎从 0 至 7 万,虽然在 2025 年 1 月末至 2 月初因特朗普正式就职该平台钱包活跃度有所下降,但随后依旧回升。目前 Polymarket 日钱包活跃数保持在 2-3 万,虽与 Pump.fun 等 Meme 发射平台日活无法相比,但仍领先于 Starknet、ZKsync 等L2。在热潮过后仍保持较高的钱包活跃度也验证了 Polymarket 具有坚实的产品市场契合度。

日交易数

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

同样,Polymarket 的日交易笔数在 2024 年美国大选期间达到顶峰,峰值接近 50 万笔。但目前即使在大选降温后,Polymarket 平台交易数仍保持在 10 万笔上方。这意味着 Polymarket 在大选虽然使用率有所下降,但与 2024 年之前相比仍留存了一大批忠实用户。

月交易量

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

Dune 数据, 2024 年 11 月 Polymarket 平台月交易量达至顶峰,峰值为 25 亿美元。但大选结束后, 2025 年 2 月至今,Polymarket 平台每月仍有 7-11 亿美元的交易量。据DeFiLlama 数据,过去 30 天,Polymarket 交易量排名第 40 位,领先于 Sushi、GMX 等老牌 DEX。

美国选举外的用户比例

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

以上图标反映的是从未参与美国选举市场的用户比例。从图中可看出,美国大选结束后,总钱包数量在减少,但从未参与过美国选举的钱包数仍保证稳定,这意味着大选结束后 Polymakert 虽流失了大量短期投机用户,但忠实平台用户并未大幅减少。从未参与美国选举市场的用户比例正在逐渐上升。

月新增用户

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?以上图表反映的是 Polymarket 的月新增用户。美国大选期间是 Polymarket 月新增用户最多的时期,但是也是 Polymarket 主要的平台增长期。但美国大选结束后,在因大选而来的投机者纷纷离开时,Polymarket 自 2025 年 3 月以来,每月仍保持 11-14 万个账号增长。这表明除去美国大选外,Polymarket 的其他预测领域仍在吸引着玩家入场,同时这也是一次 Polymarket 平台用户构成从短期热点事件投机到长期使用的“大换血”。

预测池数量

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

以上图表反映的是 Polymarket 平台每月的预测池数量。从上图中可看出, 2025 年以来,Polymarket 每月的预测池数量均多于 2024 年美国大选期间, 2025 年 5 月和 6 月,预测池还突破了 5000 ,分别达到 6771 和 8238 。这意味着 Polymarket 平台的预测投注领域正在不断扩大,有望吸引更多喜好不同领域的玩家加入。

现在撸 Polymarket 来得及吗?

从以上数据来看,Polymarket 平台仍未过时,这类具有产品市场契合度的项目也是融资市场上的香饽饽。据 Rootdata 数据,Polymarket 目前共完成 3 轮融资,总金额达 7400 万美元,同时据 6 月份消息,Polymarket 还在以超 10 亿美元的估值寻求融资近 2 亿美元。

对于 Polymarket 这样影响了传统政治媒体并将加密带出去的应用来说, 10 亿美元估值其实并不高,倘若真发币,即使是将 10% 的代币供应量空投给平台用户也可能是一个大毛。那么,考虑现在撸 Polymarket 是否来得及,实际是在考虑平台用户内卷程度,以及各种交易成本。

撸 Polymarket 并不卷

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

以上图表反映的是 Polymakert 用户的投注资金分布。如上图显示, 90% 以上的用户投注资金在 500 美元以下,投注 5000 美元-10000 美元的鲸鱼仅占 0.4% 。因此若 Polymarket 空投条件中有交易排名,那么目前来看跻身前 10% 的难度并不大,这也侧面反映了当前撸 Polymarket 并不卷,大多数人仍停留在小额低频的刷交易量和交易次数上。

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

同时在 Polymarket 平台约 120 万个钱包中,参与 5 个以上不同市场的钱包数约 51 万,不到 50% 。参与不同的市场也被认为是交互 Polymarket 的重要维度之一,该指标侧面反映的也是撸 Polymarket 空投的钱包数量,在结合上文 Polymarket 日活跃钱包为 2-3 万的数据,可想而至全网持续撸 Polymarket 的钱包也仅几万个。这与公链动辄几十万的交互地址相比,已属于“宝藏协议”。

散户现在应该如何撸?

早年间,就有用户推测 Polymarket 发币空投可能参考的维度:

  • 交易量

  • 交易次数

  • 交易频率

  • 参与不同市场数

  • 交易方式(市价、限价、AMM)

  • 持仓时间

  • 单笔交易量(如至少有一笔交互金额大于 500 美元)

以上维度也仅仅是一个参考,作为一个散户目前也许最应该注重的交易量、交易次数与频率、持仓时间这几个维度,同时控制投入的成本。对于持仓时间,玩家可投注于“ 2028 年美国总统选举”,因为该预测池较大,且距离结算时间长不容易剧烈波动,并且官方还有 4% 的持仓年化奖励。

对于刷交易量,为了减少磨损,加密博主SIiipy分享了自己的打法,即寻找一个流动性较差的预测池,使用两个钱包来回刷量,具体操作如下图。

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

除了以上小额高频刷量外,用户也可以选择当一个真实用户,在 Polymarket 平台上进行真实投注,同时博取未来空投机会。但“十赌九输”的道理在 Polymarket 上也是适用的,根据 Dune 数据,只有 14.3% 的 Polymarket 用户处于盈利状态,而约 86% 的用户账户为负余额。

现在撸Polymarket还有必要吗?散户最优策略是什么?

Polymarket 正负账户余额比例

因此,为了减少交互成本,一种使用期权套利的 Polymarket 玩法也诞生了。这种玩法仅限于 Polymarket 上的 Crypto 市场,如“BTC 在 7 月 28 日是否会跌破 118000 美元”这样的预测池,具体操作为在交易所购买 7 月 28 日到期的 118000 看跌期权,然后在 Polymarket 上购买“否”头寸(下注 7 月 28 日 BTC 不会跌破 118000 美元),如此便会自己提供的对冲,但玩家也需注意交易所和 Polymarket 结算时间不一致引发的时差风险。(相关阅读:Polymarket 有新玩法?使用期权套利

相关阅读

1.12 亿美金破局:Polymarket 借壳 QCX 重返美国

Пов'язані матеріали

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbitЩойно

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbitЩойно

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

marsbit59 хв тому

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbit59 хв тому

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

KIOXIA, a NAND flash memory giant, staged a dramatic comeback driven by AI demand. After a period of significant losses, a failed merger, and missed HBM opportunities, its 2024 IPO began modestly. However, fueled by explosive demand for AI data storage, its stock price skyrocketed over 50 times within 18 months, making it Japan's most valuable company, surpassing Toyota. Its Q1 FY2026 profit guidance soared 30-fold year-over-year, with 2026 NAND capacity already sold out. Key to its success is its 3D NAND technology, BiCS FLASH. As the inventor of NAND, KIOXIA advanced its technology through generations, reaching over 200 layers by 2023. Key innovations include CBA (CMOS directly Bonded to Array), which separately manufactures control circuits and memory arrays for better performance, and OPS (On Pitch Select Gate) to increase density. The company is now developing high-capacity packages like an 8TB solution stacking 32 dies. Looking beyond NAND, KIOXIA is exploring 3D DRAM with its OCTRAM technology, using oxide semiconductor transistors for ultra-low leakage to reduce power consumption. This fundamental research differs from HBM and represents a long-term bet to extend its 3D expertise from NAND into future DRAM architectures. KIOXIA's story highlights how technological assets and shifting market cycles can rapidly transform a company's fortunes. While questions remain about sustaining growth beyond the current AI boom, its resurgence demonstrates that in semiconductors, being down does not necessarily mean being out.

marsbit1 год тому

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

marsbit1 год тому

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

Stock Market Trends (June 23): Did SpaceX Peak at IPO? The company loses over $800 billion in market value in three days as a sharp divergence unfolds within the tech sector. SpaceX's post-IPO decline of over 20%, falling below its first-day close, reflects a swift market repricing. The catalyst is a clear shift in narrative from "AI platform potential" to concerns over rising capital costs, as its $8.57 billion IPO and subsequent $20 billion debt offering are earmarked for acquisitions and refinancing existing bridge loans rather than de-leveraging. While high-valuation tech stocks like Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft faced pressure, Micron surged nearly 7% to a record high following a strategic supply deal with Anthropic for HBM and memory, highlighting robust, tangible demand in AI infrastructure. The broader market saw funds rotate into more defensive industrial and financial names. Macro factors included a dip in oil prices to a three-month low on news of a US-Iran framework deal, though logistical hurdles for resuming full Strait of Hormuz shipments remain. Key events ahead include Nvidia's shareholder meeting, Micron's earnings, and the May PCE inflation data. The latter will be crucial in determining whether the sell-off in high-valuation growth stocks, which appears to have just begun, will persist.

marsbit1 год тому

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片