解码底部信号:加密市场的崩盘与反弹剧本

链捕手Опубліковано о 2025-06-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-06-23

原文标题:Market Selloff Dynamics + Bottoming

原文作者:Doc

原文编译:Tim,PANews

 

这篇撰文的目的是让你了解我如何识别市场中的关键信号。我们需要理解风险背后的心理机制,并借此优势来识别潜在的市场底部。

1.共识越低的项目越先崩盘

当不确定性袭来,卖家会抛售他们最不看好的资产。例如,共识低的币将率先崩盘,更早失血。

从逻辑上想想:如果你急需用钱,不会去卖你的贵重物品,而是卖掉那些平时用不着、不值钱的东西。

同样地,当交易员不确定市场走势或希望降低风险时,往往会变卖自己情感依赖最低的资产来套现。

这种现象在比特币每次冲顶时都会发生,绝非巧合。山寨币并非在比特币登顶后上涨,而是伴随比特币登顶同步上涨。它们更早在比特币面前显露出一丝疲态,数周前就已率先见顶。

这是一个早期预警信号。聪明的交易者会在其他人还未察觉要发生什么事之前就先行降低风险。

2.风险 VS 蓝筹币

让我们回到之前的那个逻辑:人们会尽可能长久地保留自己珍视的高品质财物,只有在走投无路时才会忍痛割爱。

那些最受追捧的币种,通常都会尽可能地守住已有的涨幅。这就是为什么比特币总是一副坚挺的样子,而每次市场崩盘前几周,网上总会充斥着“大家慌什么,比特币明明稳得很”之类的推文。

抛售顺序:

a)先是垃圾币

b)然后是蓝筹币

c)最后所有币都被抛售

3.反身性效应出现

疲软会导致更多的疲软。

当巨鲸开始在枯竭需求中抛售时,就会诱发市场疲软。这是典型的筹码派发阶段特征:接盘乏力、需求枯竭、趋势走远等现象。

风险资产的特征转变,将使经验丰富的交易员中核心决策层重新评估策略。

"我没能在顶部卖出,但行情性质已变。是时候降低敞口或平仓了。"

"要是这种跌幅都算核爆级崩盘,我账户里还藏着什么雷?"

突然间:仓位调整引发更大的抛售,这就是反身性,风险偏好消退的正反馈循环。

4.波动性:最后一舞

​​当比特币大跌将至,市场常现诡静:波动骤降、行情窄幅震荡、自满心态登顶。​​

然后,砰~,就崩盘了。

​​现在,让我们聚焦平衡与失衡的市场本质。​​

平衡在市场参与者对何为昂贵、何为便宜逐渐达成共识时达成。这是一场​​共舞​​。这就是​​均衡​​。

均衡则意味着平静。​​ 已知信息已被消化、投机活动减弱、波动性收窄​​。

这场​​共舞​​会持续下去,直到一方感到厌倦、疲惫,或者想去酒吧再喝一杯。即,买方或卖方筋疲力竭;或者供给、需求发生改变。

均衡遭到破坏​​。一旦它被打破:便出现​​失衡​​。

价格剧烈偏离原位。​​ 价值变得模糊不清;​​波动性暴增​​。市场渴望平衡并会​​主动寻求​​ 。

价格常常会​​回归到最近形成过平衡的区域​:如高成交量点、订单块、综合价值区域等。

正是在这些区域,你会看到最​​猛烈的反弹​​。

“​​初测即最佳时机​​”。后续测试的反应会逐渐减弱。情况趋于结构化。价格在新点位企稳。波动性收缩。平衡重现于市。

5.抛售进程及底部识别

投降抛售并非终局的开始,而是中局的终结。

a)山寨VS比特币

本轮周期中,山寨币往往在比特币崩盘前完成主要抛售。

最近案例:Fartcoin在二月底比特币崩盘前,已从高点回落88%。既然该规律成立,我们便可在寻找市场衰竭信号(触底迹象)时将其作为交易信号。

当比特币仍在剧烈波动、寻得新平衡时,最强的山寨币会率先显现相对强势的枯竭迹象。

简单来说,当比特币进入失衡后期阶段时,应该寻找优质替代币来建立平衡仓位。

作为参与者,我们的目标是捕捉这些背离现象。

"市场动能是否转变?"

"波动性是否在收窄?"

"抛售速度是否正在放缓?"

"当比特币创新低时,它是否仍能稳住?"

第二季度见底信号:

  1. 动量减弱 (比如Fartcoin)
  2. SFP、偏离度 (比如Hype、Sui公链)
  3. 更高的低点VS比特币更低的点(比如Pepe币)

山寨币通常先跌为敬,待比特币触底后其跌势反而放缓。

​​甄别优质山寨币的诀窍在此。​​

弱者恒弱。

强者悄然布局,抢在市场行情启动之前。

b)比特币VS标普500

现在给大家安排一个小练习吧。

整合本文的所有概念,或许以下现象就变得合理了:

  • 23年夏季:比特币先于标普500见顶,更早完成筑底
  • 24年夏季:比特币先于标普500见顶,并在区间低位消化了标普因宏观因素引发的暴跌
  • 25年迄今:比特币先于标普500见顶,并在区间低位承受了标普20%的暴跌

​​核心结论​​

市场筑底是过程而非瞬间完成:山寨币先行 → 比特币接力 → 标普殿后

​​操作要义​​:重点观察市场结构演变,而非单纯跟踪情绪波动

Пов'язані матеріали

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

"Rescuing US Treasuries" Relay: After Bessent's Miss, All Eyes Are on Walsh Last week, US Treasury Secretary Bessent's announcement to at least double long-term Treasury buybacks failed to sustainably lower yields, which quickly rebounded. The market response saw a drop in the dollar alongside surges in gold and Bitcoin, interpreted as a "pressure release valve" for anxiety. The focus now shifts to Fed Chairman Walsh's upcoming Jackson Hole speech. Markets are highly sensitive to his message, seeking clarity on the Fed's policy response to stubborn inflation and worsening fiscal conditions. Analysts warn that a lack of new guidance could disappoint markets and worsen the sell-off in long-dated bonds. Analysts question the scale of Bessent's operations, noting they are too small relative to the overall debt market and do not constitute quantitative easing. A key issue is the Fed's massive holdings of long-term bonds, which distorts the market. With the Fed holding low-yielding short-term bonds that are losing money relative to its policy rate, discussion is growing around a potential Fed-led "Operation Twist." This would involve selling short-term bonds to buy long-term ones, aiming to lower long-end yields without expanding the balance sheet. The upcoming PCE inflation data will set the stage for Walsh's speech. However, the window for action is narrowing amid political pressures. A critical threshold is the 30-year yield at 5%; holding above it could increase stress on the dollar and leveraged sectors. Overall, the article suggests that without coordinated Fed action to anchor inflation expectations, Treasury interventions may ultimately fail, with investors increasingly looking to assets like gold as hedges.

marsbit6 хв тому

The 'Saving U.S. Treasuries' Baton Pass: Bessent Fumbled Last Week, This Week It's Wash's Turn

marsbit6 хв тому

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit31 хв тому

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit31 хв тому

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

Investment Community AI has learned that Beijing Zhongshu Ruizhi Technology Co., Ltd., a domestic industrial-grade causal intelligence and high-reliability decision-making AI company, has recently completed a strategic financing round worth hundreds of millions of RMB. This round saw participation from China Internet Investment Fund, Suzhou Chuangtou National Social Security Fund, Financial Street Capital, ICBC Capital, Kunlun Capital, among others, with existing shareholders also increasing their investment. This follows a Series B funding round in the hundreds of millions completed just three months prior. The rapid succession of two major funding rounds signifies strong market recognition of the company's underlying original technology and scaled commercial implementation. Often referred to as the "Chinese version of Palantir," Zhongshu Ruizhi is entering a new phase of accelerated technological iteration, widespread scenario replication, and scaled performance release, mirroring the explosive growth of China's AI market. Founded in April 2020 by Dr. Han Han, a Tsinghua University Ph.D. and former core drafter of national AI policies, the company is mission-driven to "move AI from the digital world to the physical world." It focuses on the high-reliability, strong-decision industrial AI track and enterprise-grade AI Agent full-stack infrastructure. The team tackles the challenge of applying AI to China's vast and complex industrial and energy systems by developing a new intelligent operating system from scratch. Its core technological breakthrough lies in three proprietary底层 technologies: meta-causal cognitive theory, causal models, and a dynamic ontology engine. These address critical pain points of generative large models in industrial settings—such as AI hallucinations, insufficient reasoning, lack of temporal logic, unverifiable decisions, and multi-source rule conflicts—thereby providing trustworthy, explainable, and executable智能决策 capabilities. Commercially, Zhongshu Ruizhi has achieved scaled deployment, serving over 50 central state-owned enterprises and industrial groups in sectors like power, petroleum, and aerospace, with implementations in more than 800 highly complex production scenarios. The company reported doubled revenue in 2025, demonstrating strong self-sufficiency and a viable business model—a rarity among new-generation AI firms. The latest funds will be allocated towards advancing foundational theoretical research, replicating successful application models to expand market presence (including overseas), and attracting top-tier talent. Lead investor China Internet Investment Fund highlighted that in the current shift from general AI capability contests to deep industrial empowerment, industrial-grade causal intelligence is crucial for building China's modern digital foundation and fostering new quality productive forces. They expressed support for the company's efforts to define decision-making paradigms and trustworthy standards for industrial intelligence, aiming to secure a rule-making voice in the global physical AI arena.

marsbit41 хв тому

Two Funding Rounds in Three Months: The Chinese Version of Palantir is on Fire

marsbit41 хв тому

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit52 хв тому

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit52 хв тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit1 год тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片