Asset Managers Push SEC To Revive ‘First-To-File’ Principle – Details

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2025-06-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-06-08

Анотація

Asset managers VanEck, 21Shares and Canary Capital have jointly approached the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeking for a...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Asset managers VanEck, 21Shares and Canary Capital have jointly approached the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) seeking for a reinstatement of the first-to-file principle i.e. a regulatory approach that ensures exchange-traded products (ETP) applications are reviewed and approved in the order they are submitted. The trio of prominent investment firms claims that the Commission’s recent departure from this standard has stifled innovation and created an uneven playing field, among other negative consequences.

SEC’s Shift From ‘First-To-File’ Principle Signals Favoritism: ETF Issuers

In an email addressed to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins on June 5, CEOs of VanEck, 21Shares and Canary Capital in the persons of Jan van Eck, Duncan Moir, and Steven McClurg outlined a deep grievance with the Commission’s abandonment of its first-to-file principle and the adoption of simultaneous approval approach towards recent ETP applications.

The letter explained that the “first-to-file” rule acted as a strong pillar of fairness which supported innovation, and a first-mover advantage. This approval model allegedly created a competitive market landscape as smaller asset managers were able to seize significant market shares of a particular product to increase their general standing.

A statement from the letter explains:

…If multiple sponsors were working in parallel on similar ideas, those filing first were first in line to receive market approval. This has enabled the ETP industry to grow to $15.4 trillion in investor assets. Newer, innovative companies like Wisdomtree have been able to become industry leaders; it’s not necessarily established mutual fund companies that have gained high ETP market share.

However, the head executives at VanEck, 21Shares and Canary Capital explain that the SEC’s shift to a simultaneous approval method as seen with the Bitcoin spot ETFs and Ethereum spot ETFs in 2024 completely undermines the need for innovation in the ETP industry. They also strongly claim that this approach signals a favouritism towards bigger asset managers who are able to comfortably copy the products of other firms with an assurance of securing the same launch date from the Commission.

While Van Eck, Moir and McClurg acknowledge the potential reasons for simultaneous approval such as reducing the work burden on the Commission’s staff, they maintain the  “first-to-file” is integral to upholding the regulatory integrity of the US ETP market. They urge a swift return to this governance standard which they claim will ensure financial innovation, creativity and competition.

Crypto Market Overview

At the time of writing, the total crypto market cap is valued at $3.22 trillion following a 2.41% gain in the past day. Meanwhile, total trading volume currently stands at $109.06 billion.

SEC
Total crypto market valued at $3.22 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com
Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Semilore Faleti works as a crypto-journalist at Bitconist, providing the latest updates on blockchain developments, crypto regulations, and the DeFi ecosystem. He is a strong crypto enthusiast passionate about covering the growing footprint of blockchain technology in the financial world.

Пов'язані матеріали

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News15 хв тому

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News15 хв тому

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbit21 хв тому

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbit21 хв тому

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

Goldman Sachs analyzes China's AI large language model (LLM) landscape, identifying key players and a strategic shift towards efficiency and global expansion. The report highlights that Chinese open-source/open-weight models are closing the performance gap with top global proprietary models at significantly lower cost, driven by architectural innovations like MoE. This enables a "two-tier" market: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with pricing at ~$1 per million tokens, and a low-end, price-sensitive global segment. Open-source strategies aid adoption but limit monetization, as deployments via third-party platforms (e.g., AWS Bedrock, Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue for model creators. The industry is thus moving towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing to improve unit economics. Internationally, the focus is shifting from "token maximization" to ROI-driven enterprise adoption, particularly in non-U.S. markets. Major cloud platforms are integrating Chinese models (e.g., DeepSeek, MiniMax). Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman Sachs identifies **Zhipu AI** and **DeepSeek** as leaders in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** (with Seedance) leading in multimodal/video generation. **MiniMax** and **Kuaishou** are also rated favorably. The firm forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue growing from ~RMB 35bn (2026E) to RMB 879bn by 2030.

marsbit21 хв тому

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

marsbit21 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片