SUI Price Set For $10? Wave 3 Says Double-Digits Is Coming In June

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2025-05-30Востаннє оновлено о 2025-05-30

Анотація

The SUI price is seeing renewed interest as analysts predict that a major price move is underway. According to an...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The SUI price is seeing renewed interest as analysts predict that a major price move is underway. According to an Elliott Wave analysis, SUI is entering Wave 3 and could be gearing up for an explosive surge to $10 by June.

Wave 3 Breakout To Push SUI Price Above $10 

The SUI price action since April 2025 has followed a textbook Elliott Wave pattern, suggesting that the altcoin may be entering a powerful uptrend. A technical analysis shared by Crypto Bullet on X (formerly Twitter) forecasts that SUI may be preparing for a parabolic run to or above $10 by June. 

The analyst’s chart shows that SUI has completed a five-wave impulse from April’s bottom, which formed a Wave 1 structure. This was followed by a healthy price correction, now labeled as Wave 2, which appears to be either complete or very close to its end. The next leg in SUI’s Elliott Wave structure is Wave 3, historically the strongest wave and often delivering gains in the shortest period. 

Based on the analysis, the SUI price is presently respecting the wave count. The initial Wave 1 rally saw strong momentum, clear sub-waves, and a defined structure. Despite recent market uncertainty and the aftermath of the Cetus hack, the analyst noted that the correction phase in Wave 2 was expected and necessary to prepare for the next rally.

SUI
Source: Crypto Bullet on X

Based on Crypto Bullet’s analysis, SUI’s price action aligns almost perfectly with the classical Elliott Wave Theory. The altcoin is also poised to enter Wave 3 and potentially catapult to bullish targets of $10 and beyond. 

As of now, SUI is trading at $3.64, but if the wave count plays out as expected, the analyst predicts that the altcoin could soon break resistance levels near $4.70 and $5.20 on its way to a double-digit target. The chart’s technical roadmap also suggests a potential climb toward the $13 – $14 range during Wave 3, with a further push toward $16 – $18 likely as Wave 5 unfolds later in the cycle. 

SUI Prints Bullish MACD Cross

According to a technical chart analysis presented by Funkii.sui, a market analyst on X, the SUI price has just printed a bullish Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) crossover — a momentum shift that previously led to a rally of over 723.15%. This new crossover suggests that the altcoin may be entering a fresh macro uptrend after months of consolidation and corrective movement

Currently, SUI technical indicators point to a strong setup. On the weekly timeframe, the MACD line has crossed above the signal line, indicating a potential for a long-term trend reversal. The last time this signal flashed, SUI surged from under $0.6 to nearly $5. 

As a result, Funkii.sui predicts a potential move to $16 or higher, representing a gain of over 593% if the same pattern repeats. The analyst’s chart shows that SUI recently rebounded from a key support zone around the $1.8 – $2.00 range. This bounce, combined with a clean break above the 0.5 Fibonacci level, signals the possible end of SUI’s downtrend and the beginning of a new impulsive wave.

SUI
SUI trading at $3.66 on the 1D chart | Source: SUIUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Пов'язані матеріали

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手3 год тому

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手3 год тому

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit3 год тому

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit3 год тому

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手3 год тому

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片