Анатолий Яковенко из Solana вступает в дебаты о децентрализации Sui после взлома CETUS

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2024-01-24Востаннє оновлено о 2025-05-24

Основатель Solana высказал мнение по поводу дебатов о централизации в Суи.
Тест на децентрализацию должен быть объективным, а не субъективным.
Блокчейн-решение не может быть децентрализовано, если меньшинство может в одностороннем порядке заблокировать большинство.

Соучредитель Solana Анатолий Яковенко высказался по поводу продолжающихся дебатов вокруг управления Sui и истинного смысла децентрализации блокчейна. Его комментарии прозвучали в то время, как сеть Sui столкнулась с острыми вопросами после ее вмешательства в последствия многомиллионного эксплойта CETUS DEX.

Яковенко высказал свое особое мнение о том, как пользователи и разработчики блокчейна должны понимать и оценивать концепцию децентрализации.

Decentralization test is objective, not a bunch of subjective hand wavy bs:

1) can a minority unilaterally block the majority from making changes or functioning then it’s not decentralized

2) can the majority block the minority from exiting or forking its own chain (for…
— toly 🇺🇸 (@aeyakovenko) May 23, 2025

По словам Яковенко, тест на децентрализацию должен быть объективным, а не субъективным. Соучредитель Solana описывает стандарты, которые могут определить, является ли протокол блокчейна децентрализованным. Например, Яковенко заявил, что решение блокчейна не может быть децентрализовано, если группа меньшинства может в одностороннем порядке заблокировать большинство от внесения изменений или функционирования.

Лакмусовая бумажка Яковенко: что делает блокчейн по-настоящему децентрализованным?

Напротив, известный эксперт по блокчейну осудил ситуацию, когда большинство может помешать меньшинству выйти из своей цепочки или разветвить ее, утаив данные или инициировав экстренное обновление мостового контракта.

Связанный: Sui Blockchain ускоряет функцию белого списка после грязного взлома CETUS DEX

Мнение Яковенко, по-видимому, критикует действия команды Sui после их вмешательства путем изменения протокола после печально известного взлома CETUS DEX, когда хакер украл около 233 миллионов долларов из их пула ликвидности.

Мнение соучредителя Solana, по-видимому, критикует ответ Sui на взлом CETUS

Вскоре после атаки команда Sui проинформировала пользователей о мерах по предотвращению дальнейшего хищения средств. Команда Sui заявила, что заблокировала свой контракт и подтвердила, что приостановила перевод $162 млн из скомпрометированных средств. Команда также отметила, что работает с Sui Foundation и другими членами экосистемы над решением проблемы.

Действия команды вызвали спор в индустрии блокчейна, где заинтересованные стороны заявили о своей твердой позиции относительно целесообразности действий. Основатель Cyber Capital Джастин Бонс встал на сторону несогласных с действиями команды Sui, сославшись на опасности децентрализации в предположительно децентрализованной среде. Бонс считает, что валидаторы Sui вступают в сговор с целью цензурировать транзакции хакера, что равносильно централизации.

Раскол в отрасли: Бонс критикует «централизацию» Суи, Гупта защищает ее как «управление»

С другой стороны, Амог Гупта из Sui Foundation не согласен с мнением Бонса и тех, кто считает вмешательство команды Sui рискованным прецедентом.

По теме: Что означает взлом CETUS для безопасности DeFi на SUI?

По словам Гупты, команда Sui приступила к законному осуществлению распределенного управления. Гупта заявил, что действия валидаторов по достижению соглашения по конкретному событию не следует считать «сговором».

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Пов'язані матеріали

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

Velvet (VELVET) experienced a bullish push above the key $2.00 resistance on June 29, reaching a high of $2.17, fueled by partnership news with Aerodrome Finance. However, momentum has since slowed, with an 11.5% price correction in 24 hours and a 27.1% drop in trading volume. Technical analysis shows mixed signals. While the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicates sustained buying pressure, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has turned negative, signaling significant capital outflows and short-term distribution. The overall structure remains bearish on the 1-day chart, though the recent correction found support at the 20-day moving average. Market data suggests the current pullback represents controlled selling pressure rather than a full trend reversal. Key supports to watch are the $2.00 level and the 20-day moving average near $0.75. The risk-to-reward ratio for new long positions is currently unfavorable, but the steady spot Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) and funding rate indicate underlying bullish strength. Traders may consider using a deeper pullback as a potential buying opportunity.

ambcrypto5 хв тому

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

ambcrypto5 хв тому

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

**Title: Is There Another Wave for Web3 Gaming? A Veteran Player's Review: When Hype Peaks, You Must Exit at Least Half** **Summary:** In an interview, veteran player "Earn Money Chicken" shares his journey and reflections on Web3 gaming. He transitioned from being a traditional in-game trader to a Web3 gamer, having profited from games like Mobox, StepN, and Seraph, but also experiencing significant losses. He defines himself primarily as a player, not an investor, attracted to Web3 games for the blend of earning potential, engaging gameplay, and the satisfaction of researching game mechanics. While he enjoys strategic "gambling" within games, he emphasizes it's not about zero-sum competition with other players. The interview explores the complex, often adversarial relationship between players, projects, and major investors (whales). The player's experience as a traditional game merchant helped develop his analytical mindset for spotting opportunities, but wasn't directly transferable. He identifies the core sources of profit in early Web3 gaming as **"era红利" (era-specific红利)** and strategic foresight, not just simple calculations. He warns that the biggest mistake ordinary players make is calculating their return-on-investment (ROI) period at peak hype, as asset and yield depreciation can trap them. Reflecting on his wins and losses, he now advocates for managing expectations. His most successful exit was from Seraph, where he sold at a relatively good time. The key problem with current Web3 games, he argues, is that most are not mature games first. A successful Web3 game must primarily be a **good, fun game** with a genuine player base willing to spend money for enjoyment, not just participants seeking profit. The blockchain element should solve problems within that context, not be the primary driver. While he believes the sector might see another speculative boom (possibly another strong "Ponzi" model attracting hype), a truly mature and sustainable Web3 game likely needs to come from a traditional major game studio. It would leverage a proven IP, mature content, a functional NFT trading system, and attract both traditional and crypto-native players, offering more normalized returns rather than extreme暴利. His final advice: Newcomers without prior experience should avoid the space now, as it's like searching for a diamond in the rough. For those remaining, the rule is: be brave when assets are low and overlooked, but **when everyone is talking about it (at peak hype), you must sell at least half your holdings.**

marsbit38 хв тому

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

marsbit38 хв тому

Solana dApps Generated $257 Million In Q2 Revenue, Data Shows

Solana's decentralized applications (dApps) generated $257 million in revenue during the second quarter of 2026, marking the ninth consecutive quarter the network has led major Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchains in fee-generating activity. This revenue metric, considered harder than hype, indicates real on-chain economic activity like decentralized exchange trading and token launches. While the figure underscores Solana's position as one of crypto's most active ecosystems and provides a narrative edge over Ethereum rivals, it is heavily tied to high-velocity, speculative trading such as meme coin activity. This dependency means revenue could decline if market sentiment shifts. The key test for Solana's dApp economy will be sustaining this revenue base during quieter market conditions.

bitcoinist59 хв тому

Solana dApps Generated $257 Million In Q2 Revenue, Data Shows

bitcoinist59 хв тому

The Most Hidden AI Winners

"The Most Under-the-Radar AI Winners" While core AI giants and their direct suppliers have dominated headlines, a group of seemingly unrelated, decades-old manufacturing companies have emerged as major beneficiaries. A key example is Japan's TOTO, famous for bathroom fixtures. Its stock soared 145% in a year, driven not by its mainstay toilet business but by its nearly 40-year-old semiconductor ceramic component unit. Specifically, TOTO manufactures electrostatic chucks—critical, hard-to-replace parts for advanced chip manufacturing processes like etching and EUV lithography. This segment, though only 9% of revenue, contributed over 54% of operating profit in FY2025 with a 43% margin. High barriers to entry, including deep know-how in high-purity ceramic sintering and long supplier certification cycles (5+ years), secure its position. This pattern repeats across industries. Nitto Boseki, a 128-year-old glass fiber maker, saw its stock rise 325% due to near-monopoly supply of T-glass, an essential low-expansion material for AI chip substrates. Similarly, Ajinomoto, the global MSG leader, commands 80-95% of the market for ABF film, a vital insulating layer in chip packaging. These "hidden" segments, often born from deep materials science expertise, are now bottleneck supplies in the AI hardware chain, enjoying pricing power and high margins. In China's A-share market, the theme combines this AI-driven demand with domestic substitution. Companies like Zhongci Electronic (advancing in electrostatic chucks) and Honghe Technology & Feilihua (in high-end electronic glass fabrics) are gaining traction. The investment thesis hinges on whether these domestic players can rapidly scale qualified capacity to capture the supply gap within the critical time window. Ultimately, these cases show that in the AI supply chain, high-profit concentrations exist not only at the cutting-edge tech frontier but also in indispensable, difficult-to-replicate materials and components. Market recognition often lags behind fundamental profit shifts, creating potential for significant re-ratings as traditional industrial firms are re-evaluated as key enablers of advanced semiconductor manufacturing.

marsbit1 год тому

marsbit1 год тому

The Most Secretive Winners of the AI Boom

"The Most Hidden AI Winners" An unlikely group of companies are emerging as major beneficiaries of the AI boom, not from designing chips, but from supplying critical materials and components essential for advanced semiconductor manufacturing. These 'hidden winners' are traditional manufacturers whose deep expertise in materials science has become indispensable. Japanese companies are leading this trend. Toto, globally known for bathroom fixtures, has seen its stock surge 145% over the past year, driven by its 40-year-old semiconductor ceramics business, which now contributes over half of its operating profit. Its electrostatic chucks are vital for advanced chip production and require years of expertise to manufacture. Similarly, Nittobo, a 128-year-old textile firm, controls 90% of the market for T-glass, a low-expansion glass fiber essential for AI chip substrates. Ajinomoto, the world's largest MSG producer, dominates the market (80-95% share) for ABF insulating film used in chip packaging. The core insight is that chasing "advanced" chips paradoxically increases reliance on traditional, high-precision material science where supply cannot be quickly replicated. These materials are now critical bottlenecks in the AI supply chain. This trend is mirrored in China's A股 market, framed by the theme of 'import substitution'. Companies like Zhongci Dianzi (electrostatic chucks) and Honghe Technology (ultra-thin electronic cloth) are making progress, but face the test of scaling production and matching Japanese rivals' quality. The key tension lies in the slow change of market perception. While profit structures rapidly shift towards high-margin tech components, these firms retain their traditional industry classifications, creating a valuation gap that is gradually closing as their roles in the AI ecosystem become undeniable.

链捕手1 год тому

The Most Secretive Winners of the AI Boom