Биткоин сохраняет устойчивость на фоне политического давления Трампа

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2025-01-18Востаннє оновлено о 2025-04-18

Политическое давление Трампа на ФРС не мешает биткоину удерживать $85,000 благодаря резервам.

Биткоин продолжает демонстрировать стабильность, удерживая цену в диапазоне $84,000–$85,000, несмотря на нарастающее политическое давление со стороны президента США Дональда Трампа на Федеральную резервную систему (ФРС). Как сообщает CoinDesk, Трамп открыто обсуждает возможность увольнения председателя ФРС Джерома Пауэлла, обвиняя его в ошибочной монетарной политике. Это давление, связанное с тарифной политикой и высокими процентными ставками, усиливает неопределенность на финансовых рынках, но биткоин остается устойчивым, что подчеркивает его роль как актива-убежища.

Рыночная стабильность биткоина поддерживается несколькими факторами. Во-первых, инвесторы рассматривают криптовалюту как “цифровое золото”, особенно в условиях экономической нестабильности, вызванной тарифами Трампа, которые могут усилить инфляцию, как отметил Пауэлл в The New York Times. Во-вторых, трейдеры проявляют осторожный оптимизм, активно покупая колл-опционы на рост до $90,000–$100,000 и защитные пут-опционы на $80,000, согласно данным Deribit Insights. Кроме того, создание “Стратегического резерва биткоина”, объявленное администрацией Трампа в марте 2025 года, укрепляет доверие к криптовалюте, уменьшая доступное предложение.

Несмотря на политическую напряженность, прямое влияние на цену биткоина остается ограниченным. Пауэлл настаивает на независимости ФРС и не планирует уходить до конца срока в 2026 году, как указано в Reuters. Однако вероятность его увольнения, оцениваемая в 19% на Polymarket, продолжает поддерживать повышенную волатильность на рынках. Эксперты, такие как Ричард Кларида, отмечают, что ФРС вряд ли снизит ставки без явных признаков экономического спада, что может способствовать дальнейшей стабильности биткоина в краткосрочной перспективе. Инвесторы внимательно следят за развитием событий, ожидая, как политические решения повлияют на экономику и криптовалютный рынок.

Пов'язані матеріали

Circle CEO Responds to the OUSD Challenge: Stablecoin is a Winner-Takes-All Business, and We Won't Slow Down

In response to questions about the OUSD stablecoin initiative, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire argues that the stablecoin market is a "winner-take-most" platform business driven by powerful network effects, and Circle has no plans to slow down. He outlines three key drivers behind USDC's dominant position: 1. **Protocol/Software Layer Network Effects**: The value of a stablecoin network grows as more developers and services integrate it, creating compounding utility and user preference. Circle has spent nearly a decade building this ecosystem with USDC, now accelerated by mainstream adoption and enhanced by software stacks like CCTP and Gateway for interoperability. 2. **Liquidity Network Effects**: Liquidity begets more liquidity. USDC has achieved top-tier global liquidity—ranking among the top three digital assets alongside BTC and USDT—through nearly a decade of building deep primary and secondary market access across regions and venues. 3. **Regulatory and Policy Integration**: Establishing a global stablecoin requires deep regulatory engagement, licensing, and compliance across key markets—a significant, long-term investment where Circle is a leader. Allaire cites Artemis data showing USDC facilitated 80% of all dollar stablecoin on-chain transaction volume in Q1 2026, with USDT at 20% and all others negligible. He addresses OUSD's purported advantages: "free" minting/burning is often not sustainable in practice; redistributing all revenue can starve essential infrastructure investment; and large consortium models historically struggle with inefficiency and slow execution, unlike focused strategic partnerships. He reaffirms Circle's strong ongoing partnership with Coinbase on USDC and notes Circle collaborates with dozens of other stablecoin issuers through its expanding platform (Arc, CCTP, CPN, etc.). While welcoming OUSD to the ecosystem, Allaire asserts that Circle's vast, trusted network and continued investment make USDC the foundational digital dollar infrastructure for the world.

链捕手2 хв тому

Circle CEO Responds to the OUSD Challenge: Stablecoin is a Winner-Takes-All Business, and We Won't Slow Down

链捕手2 хв тому

Q2 Crypto Market Review: Did Bitcoin Rise for 'Nothing'? Did Money Flow to AI and On-Chain?

Q2 2026 Crypto Market Recap: Bitcoin's Gains Erased Amid Shift to AI and On-Chain Activity The second quarter of 2026 saw a significant reversal for the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin gave back all its April gains, ending Q2 down approximately 11%, while major stock indices posted strong gains. This divergence was driven by a hawkish shift in Fed rate expectations, capital rotation into AI stocks, and weakening liquidity channels into crypto. Key demand pillars deteriorated simultaneously. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $4.08 billion for the quarter, with outflows dominating June. Crypto treasury entity Strategy's bitcoin accumulation slowed markedly, and the total stablecoin market cap contracted by ~$4.2 billion. This created a tighter liquidity environment. Exchange data reflected the downturn. Spot trading volumes fell 28% quarter-over-quarter. The market underwent significant deleveraging, with $8.35 billion in long liquidations for BTC and ETH, primarily in late May/early June. Open interest and order book liquidity also declined. Despite the bearish price action, structural developments point to an expanding on-chain ecosystem. These include the rise of tokenized stocks with full legal rights, the growth of RWA (real-world asset) perpetual contracts for trading stocks and commodities 24/7, and the use of crypto markets for price discovery ahead of major events like the SpaceX IPO. On-chain vaults are also emerging as a core layer for institutional capital allocation.

Foresight News21 хв тому

Q2 Crypto Market Review: Did Bitcoin Rise for 'Nothing'? Did Money Flow to AI and On-Chain?

Foresight News21 хв тому

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

Xing Bo, President of MBZUAI and professor at Carnegie Mellon University, along with co-authors Mingkai Deng and Jinyu Hou, has released a new paper, "Critique of Agent Model," critiquing the current state of artificial intelligence agents. The paper draws a crucial distinction between "agentic" systems, which rely on external toolchains, prompts, and workflows, and truly "agentive" systems capable of genuine autonomy driven by internal decision-making structures. To illustrate this, it references a real-world incident where an AI programming assistant, following an external prompt but lacking internalized judgment, caused a catastrophic data deletion. The authors propose a detailed analysis and a new framework, "Goal-Identity-Configurator" (GIC), for building truly autonomous agents. This framework systematically addresses five key dimensions where current "Agent" designs fall short: 1. **Goal:** Moving from step-by-step human instruction to a system capable of autonomously decomposing a single long-term goal and adapting sub-goals based on new information. 2. **Identity:** Evolving self-assessment updated by experience, rather than a static description in a system prompt. 3. **Decision Making:** Replacing textual Chain-of-Thought reasoning with "simulative reasoning" that uses a dedicated world model to predict real-world consequences before selecting actions. 4. **Cognitive Control:** Introducing a separate "System III" metacognitive module that dynamically decides when to deliberate, stick to a plan, or act quickly. 5. **Learning:** Enabling "continual autonomous learning," where the agent itself decides when to act, practice in simulation, or update its world model and self-perception. The GIC architecture integrates six components—a belief encoder, goal decomposer, identity evolver, configurator (System III), simulation-based planner (System II), and executor (System I)—to embody these principles. The paper argues that a growth path akin to pilot training (ground theory, simulator practice, real deployment) should be underpinned by a unified cognitive architecture, not separate workflows. On safety, the authors contend that the GIC framework's modular, explicit design enhances inspectability, allowing problematic behavior to be traced to specific components (e.g., flawed goal or poorly trained module) rather than emerging opaquely. However, they acknowledge that ultimate safety depends on correctly training these modules in the first place. In conclusion, the paper challenges the loose application of the term "Agent," asserting that task completion alone does not equal true autonomy. True autonomy requires goals, identity, and judgment to be genuinely internalized within the agent's architecture, not merely enforced by external scripts.

marsbit1 год тому

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片