Tether, Galaxy, Ledn Lead Crypto Lending Revival After Billions in Loans Were Wiped Out in 2023

ccn.comОпубліковано о 2025-04-14Востаннє оновлено о 2025-04-14

Key Takeaways

Tether, Galaxy and Ledn now dominate the centralized crypto lending market, accounting for 90% of CeFi loans.
The crypto lending market has recovered since its 2023 crash but remains 43% below its 2021 peak.
DeFi remains the sector’s backbone, with Ethereum leading the charge.

The crypto lending industry is on the rebound, clawing its way back after a brutal collapse in 2023 that wiped out billions in loans and shattered confidence in centralized players.

Now valued at $36.5 billion, the market remains well below its all-time high in late 2021 — but signs of resilience are beginning to show.

A new report by Galaxy Digital shows that a new cohort of centralized players — Tether, Galaxy and Ledn — has stepped in to fill the void left by failed lenders like Celsius, Genesis and BlockFi.

The trio accounts for roughly $9.9 billion in outstanding loans, or 90% of the current centralized lending market.

CeFi’s Comeback: Smaller, Sharper, Still Struggling

Centralized finance (CeFi) lenders have bounced back from a low of $6.4 billion in outstanding loans in early 2023 to $11.2 billion today — a 73% rebound.

However, that figure is still nearly two-thirds from the 2021 peak of $29.4 billion when CeFi lending was primarily controlled by the now-defunct trio of Genesis, Celsius and BlockFi.

Their downfall, catalyzed by overleveraged loans and exposure to the collapse of the Terra Luna ecosystem, triggered a liquidity crunch that rippled across the entire industry.

crypto lending market over the years. — DeFi dominates crypto lending. | Credit: Galaxy Research

However, the new wave of CeFi lenders appears more cautious, leaning on stricter lending terms and more conservative strategies. Tether, for example, remains focused on secured loans backed by excess collateral, while Galaxy and Ledn have honed in on institutional clients.

DeFi Reclaims Its Dominance

Despite the CeFi resurgence, decentralized finance (DeFi) remains the primary force in crypto lending.

DeFi now accounts for 63% of total borrowing, up from 33% during the previous bull run. This shift underscores growing confidence in permissionless, transparent protocols — especially in the wake of CeFi’s credibility crisis.

According to Galaxy’s data, DeFi lending platforms now manage over $19.1 billion in outstanding loans across 12 blockchains and 20 platforms — a staggering 10x jump from their Q4 2022 lows. At that time, DeFi borrowing had bottomed out at just $1.8 billion.

Ethereum remains the dominant chain for DeFi activity, hosting $33.9 billion in deposited assets as of March 2025 — far outpacing all competitors.

The sector’s growth is underpinned by smart contracts, which enforce overcollateralization and minimize default risk.

Unlike CeFi, where borrowers can walk away from bad loans, DeFi protocols liquidate positions automatically when collateral thresholds are breached.

Institutions Eye Bitcoin-Backed Lending

With signs of recovery across both CeFi and DeFi, institutional interest is once again growing. Traditional financial players, particularly those focused on Bitcoin financing, are exploring new lending strategies.

Cantor Fitzgerald — a key custodian of Tether’s reserve assets — recently revealed plans to expand into crypto lending, potentially opening the door to more Bitcoin-collateralized loan products from traditional finance firms.

As both centralized and decentralized platforms evolve, the crypto lending landscape in 2025 looks very different from its speculative, loosely governed past.

Whether the market can sustain this newfound stability remains to be seen.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Пов'язані матеріали

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

Galaxy Research is investigating a mysterious Bitcoin transaction where approximately 107 BTC (worth $8.3 million) was deliberately sent to a provably unspendable "burn" address. The primary question is the motive behind destroying such a large sum. Galaxy proposed several theories, including a tax-loss strategy (though deemed unlikely for old coins), a religious or ideological act, an attempt to dispose of illicit funds, or coercion. The firm suggested a plausible explanation could be an automated error, where a trading system mistakenly sent funds to a known burn address labeled "Counterparty" instead of the intended recipient. Galaxy acknowledged all theories are speculative, and the true reason may never be known.

bitcoinist49 хв тому

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

bitcoinist49 хв тому

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit1 год тому

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手1 год тому

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit1 год тому

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

Anthropic has overtaken OpenAI in revenue by at least 35%, according to a recent report. Anthropic's annualized revenue is now approximately $45 billion, compared to OpenAI's roughly $33 billion. This represents a dramatic five-fold revenue increase for Anthropic over the first five months of the year, while OpenAI saw growth of just over 50%. The profitability gap is even more significant. Anthropic is expected to post an operating profit in Q2 with around a 5% margin. In stark contrast, OpenAI reported a massive operating loss of over 100% of its revenue in Q1, equating to a loss of at least $7 billion for the quarter. OpenAI also faces substantial costs, including paying 20% of its revenue to Microsoft and high AI server rental fees. This financial reversal impacts their potential IPO timelines. Previously, OpenAI might have been favored to go public first, but now its leadership may view an accelerated IPO as a "more financially prudent choice" to avoid direct, unfavorable public market comparisons. If Anthropic, with its superior growth and profitability metrics, were to file for an IPO first, it would gain a significant valuation advantage. At its current growth rate, Anthropic's revenue could soon surpass major tech firms like Netflix and Salesforce within a year.

marsbit2 год тому

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси