Ветеран стейблкоин-индустрии предупредил Circle о «цене» IPO

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2024-01-04Востаннє оновлено о 2025-04-04

Затраты Circle в процессе выхода на биржу ставят под угрозу позицию компании в качестве эмитента второго по капитализации стейблкоина. Об этом в интервью The Block заявил CEO Borderless Кевин Лехтинитти.

Предприниматель участвовал в запуске «первой в США полностью обеспеченной резервами» монеты TrueUSD. Возглавляемая им сейчас фирма предоставляет инфраструктуру для интеграции стейблкоинов финансовыми учреждениями.

В начале апреля Circle подала в Комиссию по ценным бумагам и биржам США заявку на проведение первичного предложения акций (IPO). Шаг стал реализацией ранее анонсированных планов по получению статуса публичной компании.

По мнению Лехтинитти, падение прибыли эмитента USDC в 2024 году может отражать рост операционных расходов на соблюдение нормативных правил с целью получения одобрения регулятора.

Основной конкурент — стоящая за USDT компания Tether — применяет иной подход. Сравнивая численность персонала, становится очевидно, что Circle тратит «кучу денег» на лицензирование, зарплаты комплаенс-сотрудникам, а также лоббирование, отметил эксперт.

В 2024 году компания заплатила криптобирже Coinbase, бывшему партнеру по консорциуму Centre, $908 млн за поддержку USDC. Сделка является расходами Circle на «дистрибуцию».

«Это стоимость даже не первой позиции, а удержания второй. Хорошее предупреждение для желающих запустить собственный стейблкоин», — подчеркнул Лехтинитти.

При этом он не видит у Circle каких-либо «уникальных преимуществ» в плане дистрибуции монеты. В то же время есть серьезные козыри у PayPal для PYUSD в виде интеграции в существующие продукты платежного гиганта.

«World Liberty придется это доказать, но у них, вероятно, есть совершенно уникальная привилегия в продвижении. Я бы предположил, что должность президента [США Дональда Трампа] дает вам определенный приоритет», — сказал Лехтинитти.

В марте DeFi-платформа, контроль над которой консолидировала семья Трампа, анонсировала запуск долларового стейблкоина USD1.

Для Circle Лехтинитти видит единственный способ сохранить позиции — добиться внедрения выгодной нормативной политики, которая вытеснит конкурентов. Это реально реализовать с помощью лоббирования, но подобная деятельность требует «совершенно безумных затрат».

В Circle и Tether разошлись во мнениях о регулировании стейблкоинов в США

Напомним, профильный комитет Палаты представителей США принял рамочный законопроект STABLE Act о регулировании стейблкоинов. Аналогичный путь прошел альтернативный документ GENIUS Act в Сенате.

Пов'язані матеріали

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

Xing Bo, President of MBZUAI and professor at Carnegie Mellon University, along with co-authors Mingkai Deng and Jinyu Hou, has released a new paper, "Critique of Agent Model," critiquing the current state of artificial intelligence agents. The paper draws a crucial distinction between "agentic" systems, which rely on external toolchains, prompts, and workflows, and truly "agentive" systems capable of genuine autonomy driven by internal decision-making structures. To illustrate this, it references a real-world incident where an AI programming assistant, following an external prompt but lacking internalized judgment, caused a catastrophic data deletion. The authors propose a detailed analysis and a new framework, "Goal-Identity-Configurator" (GIC), for building truly autonomous agents. This framework systematically addresses five key dimensions where current "Agent" designs fall short: 1. **Goal:** Moving from step-by-step human instruction to a system capable of autonomously decomposing a single long-term goal and adapting sub-goals based on new information. 2. **Identity:** Evolving self-assessment updated by experience, rather than a static description in a system prompt. 3. **Decision Making:** Replacing textual Chain-of-Thought reasoning with "simulative reasoning" that uses a dedicated world model to predict real-world consequences before selecting actions. 4. **Cognitive Control:** Introducing a separate "System III" metacognitive module that dynamically decides when to deliberate, stick to a plan, or act quickly. 5. **Learning:** Enabling "continual autonomous learning," where the agent itself decides when to act, practice in simulation, or update its world model and self-perception. The GIC architecture integrates six components—a belief encoder, goal decomposer, identity evolver, configurator (System III), simulation-based planner (System II), and executor (System I)—to embody these principles. The paper argues that a growth path akin to pilot training (ground theory, simulator practice, real deployment) should be underpinned by a unified cognitive architecture, not separate workflows. On safety, the authors contend that the GIC framework's modular, explicit design enhances inspectability, allowing problematic behavior to be traced to specific components (e.g., flawed goal or poorly trained module) rather than emerging opaquely. However, they acknowledge that ultimate safety depends on correctly training these modules in the first place. In conclusion, the paper challenges the loose application of the term "Agent," asserting that task completion alone does not equal true autonomy. True autonomy requires goals, identity, and judgment to be genuinely internalized within the agent's architecture, not merely enforced by external scripts.

marsbit5 хв тому

Xing Bo Strikes Again: Last Time 'Critiquing' World Models, This Time It's Agents' Turn

marsbit5 хв тому

How Collector Crypt Uses 'Recirculating Buybacks' to Create an Illusion of Growth

Title: How Collector Crypt Creates a Growth Illusion with "Buyback Loops" Key Findings: Collector Crypt's (CC) net take rate has halved from 11.2% in Q3 2025 to 5.6% in Q2 2026, while GMV grew 4.7x. This growth is driven by higher-tier card packs ($250, $1,000, $2,500) which have lower platform dollar retention rates. The newly launched $2,500 Mythic tier captured 36.7% of June GMV within 13 days. Growth is fueled by a small cohort of high-spending, high-frequency wallets rather than broad user base expansion. The economic model faces pressure from three key areas: 1) **Shifting GMV Mix**: Pushing users towards larger, lower-retention card packs increases GMV but reduces overall profitability. 2) **Physical Redemptions**: Card redemptions for physical items remove reusable inventory from the system, creating costly replenishment needs. In May, redemptions consumed 41.6% of pre-redemption net income. Only 75 wallets drove redemptions in June. 3) **B2B/API Strategy**: Partner revenue remains negligible (cumulatively $1.83M) and dependent on CC for inventory, vaulting, and buyback services, failing to create a scalable, asset-light recurring revenue stream. The core product is a repetitive pack-buyback loop with limited secondary market activity and token value accrual. Sensitive modeling shows CC's economics turn negative when any two of the following pressures coincide: replenishment costs near market price, redemption rates exceeding 9%, or high-tier buyback rates around 93%. While CC operates in a large and growing collectibles market, its current growth levers—bigger packs, high buyback rates, and capital recycling by a few wallets—create a volume illusion without demonstrating sustainable collector engagement, deep secondary markets, or a viable path to improved margins. Future proof points include broadening collector participation, deepening secondary trading, and developing true asset-light B2B revenue channels.

Foresight News28 хв тому

How Collector Crypt Uses 'Recirculating Buybacks' to Create an Illusion of Growth

Foresight News28 хв тому

Grayscale's Latest Research: What is Solana's Next Growth Engine?

Grayscale's latest report, "Solana: Crypto's Financial Bazaar," signals a shift in how the market views Solana, moving beyond its high-performance and meme-centric reputation. The report frames Solana as an evolving application platform for large-scale economic activity, akin to a bustling digital marketplace. The analysis highlights that public chain competition has moved past raw throughput (TPS) to focus on genuine economic activity—daily users, transaction volume, and real revenue. Solana's metrics, such as over 1,000 dApps, 100M+ daily transactions, and ~4.3M daily active users, showcase this shift toward application-layer prosperity. The report identifies three key growth drivers: 1. **Jupiter**: Evolving from a DEX aggregator to a core liquidity hub and comprehensive financial platform for Solana's DeFi. 2. **Pump.fun**: Demonstrates Solana's capacity for consumer-scale applications, attracting millions of users and generating significant, sustainable revenue, validating network stability under high load. 3. **Helium & DePIN**: Represents expansion into real-world infrastructure, connecting blockchain to physical resources like wireless networks and positioning services, opening new long-term use cases. Solana Foundation's recent focus aligns with this broader vision, emphasizing AI Agents (for machine-to-machine transactions), payments, stablecoins, and Real-World Assets (RWA) to build a sustainable growth model beyond cyclical trends. While challenges remain—such as value capture for SOL and maintaining ecosystem sustainability beyond hot trends—institutional interest is growing due to Solana's maturing application business models, expanding payment/stablecoin ecosystem, and persistent developer activity. The competition is no longer about speed alone, but about which network can foster the most vibrant and valuable digital economy.

marsbit49 хв тому

Grayscale's Latest Research: What is Solana's Next Growth Engine?

marsbit49 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片