Pi Network主网上线:人民的比特币还是泡沫最后的狂欢?

MarsBitОпубліковано о 2025-02-19Востаннє оновлено о 2025-02-21

Анотація

Pi Network 主网上线无疑是2025年初加密市场的一大事件。

一、Pi Network 主网上线:价格表现超预期


2025年2月20日16:00(北京时间),Pi Network 主网正式上线,这一经历了六年多开发的加密项目终于迎来了关键时刻。上线初期,$PI 价格迅速稳定在1.5美元左右,流通市值达到约25亿美元,超过Filecoin(FIL),并接近Internet Computer(ICP)的水平。更令人瞩目的是,其完全稀释市值(FDV)高达1800亿美元,超越BNB,逼近XRP,仅略低于以太坊。这一表现令无数“大爷大妈”用户兴奋不已,他们纷纷举办派对庆祝,称Pi为“人民的比特币”。

用户


Pi Network 诞生于2018年,作为一个以移动挖矿为特色的Layer1公链,其最大亮点在于庞大的用户基数。据官方数据,Pi Network 拥有超过1亿注册用户,其中6500万保持活跃,1900万完成了KYC验证。从上线后的市值表现来看,Pi的市场定位与ICP、XRP等公链颇为相似,其价格和估值基本符合市场对这一类项目的预期。然而,这一波热潮背后,现实问题和未来走势依然值得深思。


二、现实问题:KYC与迁移的困境


虽然Pi Network的主网上线引发了广泛关注,但项目面临的一些现实问题不容忽视。
目前的主要问题包括:

  • KYC完成率不足:尽管已有1900万用户完成验证,但占总用户比例不足20%。不少用户因身份验证过程中的技术问题未能顺利迁移。
  • 锁仓期限制:即使完成KYC,用户仍需等待14天才能将代币迁移至交易所,导致市场流动性在初期阶段有所断裂。
  • 地域性交易限制:OKX等交易所的封锁政策切断了Pi最大用户群体的交易通道,可能推动OTC市场的活跃,但也加剧了价格波动。
用户


Pi的流通量设计同样值得关注。据X平台用户透露,Pi的总供应量为1000亿枚,而通过KYC迁移至主网的代币约为60多亿枚,其中45亿枚被锁仓,实际流通量仅约10亿枚。虽然这种低流通、高锁仓的结构在短期内支撑了价格,但随着锁仓代币逐渐释放,市场可能面临抛压的风险。


三、对标Core Dao:历史会否重演?价格预测


为了评估Pi Network的价格合理性,可以参考另一个类似的项目——Core(Core DAO)。2023年,Core上线时,凭借类似的用户挖矿模式和社区驱动,价格曾一度达到4美元,FDV达到140亿美元。然而,Core上线后的价格迅速回落,目前稳定在0.1美元左右,反映出市场对“挖矿拉人”模式的溢价逐渐消退。

用户


Pi Network的核心竞争力在于其庞大的用户基数。据2025年2月19日数据,Pi的应用程序已在Google Play商店达到1.1亿次下载,日活跃用户接近1400万。这使Pi具备了强大的传播能力,吸引了大量新用户和加密货币交易所的注意。特别是Pi通过零门槛挖矿吸引传统互联网用户,形成了一个庞大的“币圈外流量池”。这种社交传播效应能有效推动价格上涨,尤其是在初期阶段。

用户


Source:X@Wolfy_XBT


Pi Network 凭借更大的用户基础和社区信仰,短期内或许能维持较高估值。但如果抛压能够被稳定控制,比如通过锁仓机制或社区共识有效管理流通量,Pi 的价格甚至有可能对标PEPE和XRP。PEPE作为典型的Meme币,市值一度突破70亿美元,却几乎没有实际价值支撑;XRP则依靠韩国“大妈”投资者持续买入和持有,稳定在数百亿美元市值,尽管其生态实用性也常被质疑。Pi Network 若能复制这种“信仰驱动+控盘”的模式,价格或将进一步冲高至2-3美元区间,甚至挑战更高水平。不过,这一切的前提是生态建设和市场情绪能够维持热度,以及背后团队的抛压管理。


毕竟从更长远的角度来看,Pi的价格走势将受限于其生态建设和应用场景。如果Pi无法有效将庞大的用户群体转化为实际的价值支撑,价格将面临长期下行压力。总供应量高达1000亿枚的Pi代币,也面临着解锁机制可能带来的通胀风险,若市场无法吸收新增供应,Pi的价值将受到稀释,最终可能演变为“零和博弈”。


四、交易所态度与未来走势:最后一波拉升后可做空?


目前,各大交易所对Pi Network 的态度呈现分化。OKX因政策限制暂时难以支持大陆用户,而币安(Binance)则表现出一定兴趣。此前,币安曾宣布针对PI发起社区投票,以决定是否上线交易。考虑到Pi 的庞大用户群和市场热度,未来不排除币安会在主网上线后将其列为交易对,进一步推高价格的可能性。
若币安真的上线PI,可能会引发“最后一波拉升”。参考历史案例,许多新币上线头部交易所后,短期涨幅可达50%-200%,尤其是拥有强社区支持的项目。届时,PI价格可能突破2美元,甚至接近此前X用户提到的最高点2.88美元。然而,这种拉升往往伴随着高位抛售风险。结合Pi 的高FDV(1800亿美元)和潜在的锁仓解禁压力,建议投资者在拉升后谨慎操作,甚至可考虑做空获利。


结语


Pi Network 主网上线无疑是2025年初加密市场的一大事件。其1.5美元的开盘价和1800亿美元的FDV展现了社区力量的惊人潜力,但KYC困境、流通量设计以及交易所政策的不确定性,也为未来埋下隐忧。对比CORE的走势,Pi 的高估值或许只是泡沫初期的狂欢。若币安等交易所介入,短期内可能迎来最后一波炒作,但长期价值仍需生态落地来支撑。对于普通投资者而言,参与这场“人民的比特币”盛宴需保持警惕,切勿盲目追高。

Пов'язані матеріали

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir and a member of the "PayPal Mafia," shared his experiences working alongside Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. He described both as highly opinionated, ambitious, and intolerant of broken systems, demanding immediate fixes and rapid execution. Thiel is characterized as a strategic philosopher, while Musk is a hands-on engineer deeply involved in technical details. Musk is noted as one of the hardest workers Lonsdale has ever seen, a trait common in PayPal's early, passionate culture that later spawned numerous billion-dollar companies. Lonsdale recounted Palantir's origin story. While working at Thiel's hedge fund, he and Thiel discussed how Silicon Valley's technology far outpaced the government's, especially after 9/11. They saw an opportunity to build a platform to help stop terrorist attacks while protecting civil liberties. Their initial venture capital pitches were met with rejection and ridicule. However, Thiel viewed this as motivation. Critical funding eventually came from the CIA's venture arm and Thiel himself. Reflecting on Palantir's impact, Lonsdale believes their work helped neutralize thousands of terrorists and ensured government oversight, though he acknowledges the potential dangers if such powerful technology is misused. His key takeaway echoes Thiel's early advice: being rejected and laughed at can fuel the determination to prove the doubters wrong.

marsbit12 хв тому

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

marsbit12 хв тому

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

"15 Reasoning Models Collectively Fail: Revealing Hidden Risks in Chain-of-Thought Outputs" A systematic study led by researchers from Harvard, USC, Brown, and MIT warns that evaluating only the final output of large reasoning models (LRMs) is insufficient for safety. The research highlights that the intermediate reasoning chains (CoT) these models expose can contain dangerous content—like bomb-making instructions or poisoning recipes—even when the final answer appears safe. The core methodology involves separately assessing the reasoning chain and the final answer against 20 safety principles, each scored 1-5 for risk. This identifies three key failure modes: 'Unsafe' (both stages unsafe), 'Leak' (unsafe reasoning but safe answer), and 'Escape' (safe reasoning but unsafe answer). The team evaluated 15 reasoning models on a combined in-distribution dataset of 41K prompts from seven public harmful/jailbreak datasets. A universal finding across all 15 models was that reasoning chains are consistently riskier than final answers. Risk is concentrated in categories like misinformation, illegal activity, bias, and physical/psychological harm, with illegal compliance showing the starkest divergence. Case studies reveal instances where harmful operational details are 'leaked' in reasoning or a seemingly harmless chain 'escapes' into a dangerous final answer. To mitigate this, the researchers propose 'Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering,' a white-box, test-time intervention method. It identifies unsafe principles being activated during reasoning and gently steers the model's internal representations towards safer directions. Validated on open-source models, this approach reduced unsafe outputs by up to 40.8% while preserving 97.7% of benchmark performance. The work underscores the critical need to monitor and secure the entire reasoning process, not just the final output.

marsbit17 хв тому

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

marsbit17 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片