Жертва криптоаферы подал иск на $3 млн против трёх азиатских банков

investing.ruОпубліковано о 2025-01-03Востаннє оновлено о 2025-01-03

Happycoin.club - Дитель Калифорнии Кен Лием подал иск против трёх банков, гонконгских Fubon Bank Limited и Chong Hing Bank Limited и сингапурского DBS Bank, после того, как криптомошенники обманом выманили у него почти $1 млн.

Согласно поданному в американский суд заявлению, Лием стал жертвой аферы ещё летом 2023 года. Тогда мошенники связались с ним через соцсеть LinkedIn с заманчивым предложением инвестировать в криптовалюту.

В течение нескольких месяцев они убеждали Лиема перевести почти $1 млн на счета, предположительно открытые в Fubon Bank, Chong Hing Bank и DBS Bank. Аферисты уверяли будущую жертву, что эти средства будут надёжно инвестированы от его имени.

Лием обвиняет банки в том, что они нарушили Закон США о банковской тайне, поскольку у DBS Bank есть филиал в Калифорнии, а Fubon Bank и Chong Hing Bank проводили транзакции через американский счёт жертвы в Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC).

В иске говорится, что финансовые организации не провели надлежащую проверку KYC («Знай своего клиента») и AML (принципы противодействия отмыванию денег), которая могла бы выявить подозрительные действия и предотвратить мошенничество. Теперь Лием требует от банков возмещения ущерба не менее $3 млн.

В 2024 году, согласно отчёту Cyvers, криптоаферы, связанные с манипулированием, привели к краже $3,6 млрд.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Happycoin.club

Пов'язані матеріали

Zuckerberg Gave the AI Bull Market a Fright

Mark Zuckerberg and Meta inadvertently sent shockwaves through the AI stock market. News that Meta plans to sell its "excess" AI computing power to external clients triggered a trillion-dollar sell-off in AI infrastructure stocks like Nvidia and AMD, while Meta's stock rose. This seemingly simple business move—renting out idle resources—shook a core assumption underpinning the two-year AI bull market: the belief that computing power ("compute") would be perpetually scarce. This scarcity narrative had fueled valuations across the entire supply chain, from GPUs to power suppliers. Meta's motivations are layered: improving hardware utilization during non-peak R&D periods, executing a strategic pivot, and redefining AI infrastructure. Unlike rivals selling APIs, Meta's open-source approach with Llama appears aimed at building an ecosystem where it ultimately profits from the underlying compute, similar to how AWS transformed from Amazon's internal capacity. Meta is essentially offering an integrated "AI factory" service, not just raw GPU rental. The market's fear wasn't Meta selling a few chips, but the signal that GPU supply might become more shareable and efficient, transitioning the industry from a Capex-driven "hoarding" model to an Opex-driven "utilization" model. This could fundamentally reset valuation logic from scarcity to efficiency. While the sell-off reversed somewhat as investors realized this shift is long-term, the direction is set. The move marks a potential inflection point: the era of easy valuation gains from simply buying GPUs may be ending, giving way to an era where operational efficiency and return on AI assets take center stage.

marsbit10 хв тому

Zuckerberg Gave the AI Bull Market a Fright

marsbit10 хв тому

Arcus Chooses "Stepfather" Robinhood Chain, "Biological Father" dYdX Awkwardly Attempts to Salvage the Situation

Robinhood officially launched its own Layer 2 network, Robinhood Chain. In response, many major DeFi protocols like Uniswap and Chainlink announced integration. A key point of discussion was Arcus, a new decentralized exchange (DEX) developed by the dYdX team, which chose to launch on Robinhood Chain instead of the native dYdX Chain. Arcus offers 24/7, zero-fee trading of 95 tokenized stocks and perpetual contracts. This move sparked community concerns about dYdX Chain potentially being sidelined, causing DYDX token's price to drop over 12%. Critics questioned if dYdX Labs' focus is shifting to Arcus and how DYDX token holders would benefit from Arcus's future growth, especially as its founder mentioned a future Arcus token would allocate a portion to the dYdX community. dYdX founder Antonio Juliano clarified that dYdX Chain will continue operating, but acknowledged its deep decentralization involved trade-offs in performance and user experience. He stated Arcus is a separate product led by a new CEO, responding to market demands for faster, simpler platforms. The dYdX Foundation also confirmed DYDX's role remains unchanged for dYdX Chain governance and staking, with no plans for token migration. However, the core uncertainty remains: if Arcus succeeds, how will that value flow back to dYdX Chain and its DYDX token holders?

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Arcus Chooses "Stepfather" Robinhood Chain, "Biological Father" dYdX Awkwardly Attempts to Salvage the Situation

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片