Web3 律师:想要合法出“U",目前有哪些渠道和方法?

链捕手Опубліковано о 2024-12-21Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-10

Анотація

一些个“出油”渠道存在的法律风险以及可行性,帮助大家合法合规的使用和处置加密资产。

作者 :肖飒 lawyer

最近部分伙伴们联系飒姐团队,想要咨询兑换加密货币(特别是USDT)的法律风险以及基本渠道和实际操作方式,今天飒姐团队就简要的为大家讲解一下,当前一些个“出油”渠道存在的法律风险以及可行性,帮助大家合法合规的使用和处置加密资产。
特别说明,本文仅针对资金来源干净、买币持币仅用于个人日常消费和正常投资行为的普通用户。同时,本文详述的所有方式均为飒姐团队在为客户提供法律服务的过程中所知悉,飒姐团队与渠道本身并不存在任何利益关联,相关意见均为一家之言,仅供参考。


01、香港持牌加密交易所+券商渠道换 U


目前,香港证监会官宣的持牌加密资产交易所(或运营主体)名单已经高达7家,前两天更是一口气释出4张牌照,可见加密资产在香港发展的繁荣。

Web3律师:想要合法出“U",目前有哪些渠道和方法?


根据飒姐团队的实务经验,目前出U的话,走香港渠道其实不失为一个合法合规且法律风险小的方式。但是要注意,目前USDT等加密资产并不能直接上持牌交易所进行交易,需要通过BTC/ETH现货渠道来进行辅助操作。具体实操,以HKVAX家为例。


HKVAX家背后是老牌券商“胜利证券”(股份代码︰8540.HK)是香港的一家全牌照券商,在入局加密资产赛道前就已持有1、2、4、6、9号牌,其在2023年又拿到了香港证监会发给的加密资产交易、咨询及资管服务牌照。因此,其可以合法的使用香港BTC/ETH现货渠道,帮助用户将U兑换为BTC或ETH或其他法定货币,交易周期极短,基本不会受到市场金融风险的影响。兑换完成后,资金(港币或美金)会打到香港的银行账户。
这种途径的优点在于出U的合规性较好,资金链路清晰,收到赃款的可能性较低,基本上没有冻卡风险。但是同样也存在缺点,首先,当前大陆居民身份是不能直接开加密资产交易账户的,如走该渠道可能需要境外的靠谱亲友们提供帮助;其次,该种兑换方式有可能需要肉身赴港(开自己的银行账户等),对于小额出U来说较为繁琐,不太方便。


02、某安、某 k 等头部交易所均可以通过 OTC 的方式卖出


这个途径成本最低,自行开户操作即可,但是需要注意的是,该种渠道目前已经成为了最容易收到黑钱的渠道之一,收到黑钱后不仅银行卡可能会被冻结,资金无法使用,甚至有可能后续会被我国司法机关作罚没处理。
如要选择该种途径出U,飒姐团队建议多查看交易方的平台交易记录、评价等信息,选择信誉度高的对手方进行交易,远离交易信誉差以及交易记录显著异常的对手方。


03、U 卡换钱


关于U卡的合规性,飒姐团队已经专门出文章进行了说明:
飒姐团队 |普通人能用U卡吗?U卡发卡商会不会出事?
总体而言问题不大,甚至部分U卡还能绑定微信、某黄色袋鼠、某蓝色钱包等App进行使用。
但是,U卡同样存在风险,目前市面上比较多的是万事达或者银联U卡,资金来源比较安全,但开卡代理太多,自行选择一个靠谱且KYC能过得去的即可。部分U卡服务提供商确实存在突然停止服务的情况,飒姐团队在今年就曾接到几位伙伴的咨询,称其此前开办的U卡服务提供商在前几个月,突然停止为中国大陆地区的用户提供服务,导致自己还有一笔钱卡在里面动不了,造成了很多麻烦。


04、币商换钱出 U


关于币商换钱的风险,大部分风险与交易所OTC出金相似,同样有可能收到来路不明的黑钱导致被冻卡或作为证人采集证言,甚至飒姐团队还处理过因找币商多次换钱,导致被作为嫌疑人(共犯)调查的极端案例。


总体来说,币商的风险相对来说较大,切勿轻信所谓的“冻卡担保”“冻卡赔偿”等宣传,如无非常靠谱且知根知底的合作伙伴,切勿选择该路径出U。


05、香港线下换 U


这种路径,一般需要有境外(香港也可以)的银行卡,飒姐团队在处理案件的过程中,曾与客户一同肉身赴香港参观了各种线下小店的换U过程。


香港的实体店分两种,一种是ATM机,另一种则是线下小店。一般情况下,这些小店对于每日交易额低于12万港币的,都不会做客户信息登记,随换随走;超过12万港币的交易,则需要做简单KYC,手续费一般在4%上下浮动。


整体而言,飒姐团队认为,对于资金来源干净、买币持币仅用于个人日常消费和正常投资行为的普通用户而言,确实是一个成本低的方便渠道。但是,同样也存在收到黑钱的风险,建议去旺角或尖沙咀等较为稳定、长期经营的门店兑换,以防发生意外。


06、写在最后
需要注意的是,当前并没有一个所谓“完全安全““完美无缺”的出U方案,即使是本文中给出的集中解决路径,依然存在收到黑钱、交易成本高等风险,建议伙伴们慎重考虑后再出手,切勿作出轻率的决定。

Пов'язані матеріали

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手3 год тому

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手3 год тому

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit3 год тому

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit3 год тому

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手3 год тому

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片