盘点 ETHGLOBAL 新加坡站入选项目：支付赛道受到青睐

链得得Опубліковано о 2024-10-14Востаннє оновлено о 2024-10-17

整理：J1N，Techub News

香港时间 9 月 22 日，ETHGlobal 公布了 2024 新加坡 ETHGlobal 黑客松入围「决赛圈」的项目。伴随着 TOKEN2049 盛会的成功召开，本次黑客松并不像现在的行情一样冷清，参赛项目超过了 300 个，最终 10 个项目脱颖而出。

从入围的项目来看，支付成为了最重要的赛道之一。在移动支付已经足够发达的中国或许我们无法理解，但在支付基础设施并不完善的其他国家和地区，支付已经成为了加密货币首先落地的重要应用场景之一。

2024 年新加坡 ETHGlobal 大赛公布了入围名单，共有 10 个项目从 310 个参赛项目中脱颖而出，本文将介绍这些优秀项目。

Clarity：Web3 支付网关协议

Clarity 是一个针对虚假评论和交易透明度问题的 Web3 支付网关项目。它通过将信息上链结合 Sign Protocol 和 World ID 身份验证，确保每条评论都来自真实用户，而不是机器人或多个账户操控。并为积极参与的用户提供代币奖励，以鼓励他们分享真实的产品反馈。

为了提升商家的信誉，Clarity 为每个商家创建了 ENS 地址，让用户可以识别和信任商家的信息。此外，Clarity 提供简便的智能钱包创建功能，用户仅需通过 Google 即可登陆。

这些措施能够为商家和消费者建立一个更可信的支付和评论环境，从而减少了虚假评论对企业声誉和收入的影响。

奖项：

The Graph - Best New Subgraph Grand Prize

Sign Protocol - Best Overall Application & Best Consumer Application

Worldcoin - Best Use of World ID 2nd place

Memora：数字资产管理平台

Memora 是一个数字资产管理平台，旨在通过 NFT 保护用户的数字足迹，提供安全、灵活的数字资产管理服务。用户可以在平台上链接他们的各种数字账户，如社交媒体、电子邮件和云存储等，并根据个人生活中的重大事件（例如死亡、婚礼或工作变动）设定访问权限和操作条件。其核心功能是时间胶囊 NFT，这些 NFT 能安全地存储用户的数字内容和资产，并确保在特定事件发生后，预设的受益人可以获得访问权限。平台还配备了 AI 代理，这些代理负责实时监控用户的账户活动，以确认预设的事件是否发生，确保资产转移的顺利进行。这种设计使得用户能够在发生特定事件后，智能合约自动将资产和信息转移给指定的亲友，从而有效管理其数字遗产。

奖项：

Gaia - Build a Public Good Integration with web3 AI 1st place

Worldcoin - Pool Prize

Fill Me Up：多链 Gas 费管理工具

Fill Me Up 是一个多链 Gas 费管理工具，帮助用户自动管理在不同链上的 Gas 费。用户只需在某一条链上预先设置资金，系统会监控他们在所有链上的 Gas 费使用情况。当某一链的 Gas 费不足时，系统会自动从已批准的资金中提取并将其转移到需要补充 Gas 费的链上。这样，用户无需手动操作，就能确保他们的交易不会因燃气不足而失败，同时也保持对资产的安全控制。这种方式有效简化用户管理 Gas 费的流程。

奖项：

Reown - Best projects building with Reown's AppKit

NounsDAO - Expand Public Goods 1st place

Hyperlane - Best Application

Angpao Money：链上「红包」

Angpao.money 是一个简化加密货币接收流程的工具，用户可以通过创建「魔法链接」来发送加密资产。具体而言，「魔法链接」指的是发送人首先把资金存入智能合约，并自定义一个链接，然后将这个链接分享给接收者。接收者点击链接后，可以选择连接已有的钱包，或者通过社交媒体登录创建一个新钱包，最后只需签名就能接收到资金，而整个过程不需要支付任何 Gas 费。

奖项：

The Graph - Best Substream Grand Prize

ENS - Best use of ENS 1st place

Worldcoin - Pool Prize

Geist：去中心化网站开发平台

Geist 是一个去中心化网站（dWebsite）开发平台。它通过将网站的数据存储在 IPFS和使用 ENS 来管理域名，确保网站内容不可被篡改。Geist 试图解决些问题，比如如何保护用户隐私、验证身份和控制访问权限。它提供私人预览和投票功能，让去中心化自治组织（DAO）能够更有效地协作。简单来说，Geist 旨在让去中心化网站的开发变得更加安全和高效。

Hanseek：基于 World ID 认证的美食视频评论平台

Hanseek 是一个基于 World ID 认证的美食视频评论平台，旨在提升餐厅推荐的真实度。通过 World ID 验证评论者身份，确保评论仅来自真实用户。所有评论存储在 Flow 区块链上，保证信息透明且不可篡改。该平台允许用户浏览短视频评论并直接预订餐厅。当用户根据评论光顾餐厅时，评论创作者会获得奖励，同时餐厅也能通过真实反馈吸引顾客。

奖项：

Flow - Most Killer App Potential 2nd place

Worldcoin - Pool Prize

fheProxies：去中心化网络代理服务平台

fheProxies 是一个去中心化的网络代理服务平台，利用完全同态加密（FHE）技术为用户提供安全和匿名的网页浏览体验。它允许全球的节点运营商在不同地区启动代理节点，并设置订阅费用。只有通过 Fhenix 网络付款的用户才能访问节点的详细信息，在这个系统中，用户的 IP 地址是加密的，未经授权的用户在 IP 泄露时会被阻止访问。

奖项：

Fhenix - Best use of Fhenix Stack 3rd place

Squidl：注重隐私的加密货币支付平台

Squidl 是一个注重隐私的加密货币支付平台，旨在简化和安全地处理加密货币及信用卡付款。用户可以通过自定义的静态支付链接（或 ENS 地址）接受付款，而无需暴露个人身份或财务信息。该平台支持与多个网络，如以太坊、BSC、Morph、Linea 和 Flow EVM 等的集成，允许用户接收各种加密货币支付方式。

Squidl 表示，通过使用隐身地址，每笔交易都是私密且不可追踪。此外，信用卡付款可转换为 USDC 并桥接到 BSC，并且可以将资金桥接到 Oasis Sapphire 网络，以实现完全不可追踪的交易，进一步增强安全性。该平台还支持 NFT 和其他代币的私人转移，提供易于使用的界面、统一的仪表板和功能齐全的开发者 SDK，适合任何希望以隐私、灵活性和控制力管理付款的人士。

奖项：

Oasis Protocol - Best use of Sapphire and/or ROFL 3rd place

Dynamic - Best Consumer Crypto Project

NiFi：基于加密货币资产的 WiFi 接入门户

NiFi 是一个基于加密货币资产的 WiFi 接入门户，用户可以通过他们在数字钱包中持有的加密货币或 NFT 来连接 WiFi，而不是使用手机号码等传统方式。这种方法让身份验证更加便捷，同时避免了传统 WiFi 登录中常见的问题，让用户能够更容易地访问网络。

NiFi 支持 ERC20、ERC721 和 ERC1155 等代币作为访问凭证来验证用户身份。通过预身份验证和转发服务，该系统决定用户是否可以访问网络。NiFi 表示，这种基于代币的方式增强了安全性，还支持多种应用场景，比如按次付费的网络使用和通过 NFT 机票获得的航空公司 WiFi 访问，从而推动 DID 的实际应用。

奖项：

Dynamic - Most Innovative Integration

Marina Royale：去中心化彩票平台

Marina Royale 是一个基于 Uniswap V4 的去中心化彩票平台，用户可以利用流动性代币启动彩票池，而不需要传统的 ERC4626 金库。该平台特别为 Meme 社区和持有实用代币的用户设计，允许他们以新的方式使用流动性。用户可以通过优化的移动体验参与，不需要支付任何 gas 费用，

Marina Royale 的主要特点是采用基于风险的彩票池分配和多样的获胜方案。玩家可以通过参与彩票赢取奖金，但也可能损失投入的本金；流动性提供者则可以从未中奖的彩票中获得收益，并通过内置的推荐系统获得额外收入。推荐系统会将彩票票面价值的 20% 分配给推荐人，剩余的 80% 则分给流动性提供者。

在技术实现方面，项目使用了两个智能合约（Lottery.sol 和 LotteryManager.sol），以及 Pyth 网络生成的安全熵，确保彩票的公平性和可预测性。

奖项：

Pyth Network - Most Innovative use of Pyth Entropy

Uniswap Foundation - Hooks, Hooks, and Hooks 2nd place

作者：TechubNews；来自链得得内容开放平台“得得号”，本文仅代表作者观点，不代表链得得官方立场凡“得得号”文章，原创性和内容的真实性由投稿人保证，如果稿件因抄袭、作假等行为导致的法律后果，由投稿人本人负责得得号平台发布文章，如有侵权、违规及其他不当言论内容，请广大读者监督，一经证实，平台会立即下线。如遇文章内容问题，请联系微信：chaindd123

链得得仅提供相关信息展示，不构成任何投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

Galaxy Research is investigating a mysterious Bitcoin transaction where approximately 107 BTC (worth $8.3 million) was deliberately sent to a provably unspendable "burn" address. The primary question is the motive behind destroying such a large sum. Galaxy proposed several theories, including a tax-loss strategy (though deemed unlikely for old coins), a religious or ideological act, an attempt to dispose of illicit funds, or coercion. The firm suggested a plausible explanation could be an automated error, where a trading system mistakenly sent funds to a known burn address labeled "Counterparty" instead of the intended recipient. Galaxy acknowledged all theories are speculative, and the true reason may never be known.

bitcoinist1 год тому

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

bitcoinist1 год тому

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit1 год тому

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手1 год тому

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit2 год тому

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

Anthropic has overtaken OpenAI in revenue by at least 35%, according to a recent report. Anthropic's annualized revenue is now approximately $45 billion, compared to OpenAI's roughly $33 billion. This represents a dramatic five-fold revenue increase for Anthropic over the first five months of the year, while OpenAI saw growth of just over 50%. The profitability gap is even more significant. Anthropic is expected to post an operating profit in Q2 with around a 5% margin. In stark contrast, OpenAI reported a massive operating loss of over 100% of its revenue in Q1, equating to a loss of at least $7 billion for the quarter. OpenAI also faces substantial costs, including paying 20% of its revenue to Microsoft and high AI server rental fees. This financial reversal impacts their potential IPO timelines. Previously, OpenAI might have been favored to go public first, but now its leadership may view an accelerated IPO as a "more financially prudent choice" to avoid direct, unfavorable public market comparisons. If Anthropic, with its superior growth and profitability metrics, were to file for an IPO first, it would gain a significant valuation advantage. At its current growth rate, Anthropic's revenue could soon surpass major tech firms like Netflix and Salesforce within a year.

marsbit2 год тому

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси