如何衡量链上数据的开放价值|大公专栏

链捕手Опубліковано о 2024-09-30Востаннє оновлено о 2024-09-30

图片在新加坡Token2049 期间,欧科云链研究院受邀参加 Bloomberg 主办的企业另类资产投资峰会 2024,与多位专家围绕未来数据形态与前景进行了深入交流。

活动后,欧科云链研究院负责人 Lola Wang 与资深研究员 Jason Jiang 在大公网发表署名文章《如何衡量链上数据的真实价值?》,就链上数据在 Web3 生态中的开放价值及应用潜力进行了深入分析

图片

 1. 链上数据使用量是衡量 Web3 应用的关键指标 

就像 Web2 时代用活跃用户数(DAU)和页面浏览量(PV)评估平台活跃度一样,链上数据使用量也展现着 Web3.0 应用的真实生命力:不仅有链上交易,还关注过程中的用户行为、智能合约执行、链上交互及投票等多维数据,体现着 Web3.0 应用在用户粘性、交互质量和创新拓展等方面的综合能力。

据欧科云链研究院不完全统计,目前市面上存在的公有链已经超过 1000 条。以欧科云链 OKLink 为例,短短数年已积累 2000+TB 的链上数据,这相当于 66 万部电影、10 亿张照片和 20 亿本电子书的体量。

图片

图片来源:OKLink

除了公链,其他构型的区块链项目对链上数据使用量也愈加重视。以蚂蚁链为例。在最初探索区块链技术时,蚂蚁链专注于增加链上交易量,但近期在其向外界介绍首个 RWA 产品时,首次重点提及链上数据使用量的提升:到 2023 年,蚂蚁链链上数据读取量已达到日均 1 亿次。因此,不论是公链还是联盟链和私有链,虽然技术架构和发展路径存在差异,但链上数据使用量都是衡量区块链应用活跃度与价值的重要指标。

但与其他类型数据类似,链上数据可真实展现其所对应区块链的真实使用情况,但并不能直接创造价值。所以,如何对原本“可见但不可用”的链上数据进行提炼解析,并进一步提供更好用的数据生产力工具,激发出更强大的数据共创力就变得更为重要。港股上市公司欧科云链(01499.hk)作为香港本土链上数据服务商,就可提供基于其庞大链上数据储备之上 50 余条市面主流公有区块链浏览器、数据 API 服务以及最新面对技术开发者的 EAAS(Explorer As A Service)服务,持续提升链上数据使用效率,释放数据价值。

图片图片来源:OKLink

从这点来讲,无论是服务传统金融市场的 Bloomberg 还是深耕于链上数据赛道的 Web3 技术公司,挖掘数据价值是两者共通之处。

 2. 链上数据的开放价值,远超想象 

当然,这些不足以完全释放链上数据的应用潜力。

当越来越多的社会生产与经济活动开始向链上大规模迁移,链上数据的规模和开放价值也将进一步提升。无论是港府选择在区块链网络中发行代币化绿色债券,还是摩根大通与星展银行等机构使用 Aave 协议完成以太坊网络上的外汇和债券交易,全球传统金融业正在不断探索区块链与其现有业务的融合。

正如北方信托数字资产和金融市场全球主管 Justin Chapman 此前说的,“ 有一些令人信服的使用案例,有望将新的资产类别和产品推向市场,利用代币化、平台、生态系统和新数据源的力量,通过价值链带来效益,提供更好的管理和可操作的洞察力。”

而这些基于区块链技术的创新背后,实际上流动着的是海量的链上数据。

链上数据的开放性,本质上源于区块链技术的公开性与透明性:所有的链上活动,包括智能合约执行和资产转移都会准确记录在区块链网络中,任何人可以实时查询与验证。这种由技术开放所带来的数据开放价值在加密原生项目中尤为明显。在 DeFi 市场,所有的资金流动和交易记录都对用户公开,用户可以实时查看资金池中的流动性状况,而无需依赖中心化机构,不仅增加了用户对平台的信任,也大幅度降低了资金使用过程中的道德风险;而在 NFT 交易活动中,链上数据的开放透明让创作者和买家可以更轻松地验证艺术品的真实性和历史交易记录,避免伪造和欺诈行为的发生。

更重要的是,链上数据不仅是开放的,还是公共的:任何人、组织或机构都能利用链上数据进行分析、研究和创新。开发者能基于链上交易数据构建去中心化应用(DApp),研究人员可以基于用户数据分析链上经济行为,商业机构也能通过链上数据进行市场前瞻洞察。这种公共性极大提高了数据利用率,使其不仅是为个别用户或公司创造价值,更在推动整个 Web3 生态系统的繁荣。

图片图片来源:Bloomberg🇸🇬 闭门会议现场
欧科云链研究院(OKG Research)作为主旨演讲嘉宾现场演示链上数据的应

不过,开放性和公共性只能保证链上数据理论上是可信和可用的,但实际中究竟该如何利用和使用,让其发挥出应有价值还需要做更多工作。但显然,让所有人具备从链上数据抓取、处理、存储、整合到分析的全方位能力并不现实,也会出现“重复造轮子”的现象,所以需要更多开发者与科技公司做好数据分析与使用前的前置工作,让链上数据变得更易得和更好用。就如同生成式 AI 让每个人都有可能成为“内容创作者”,更好用的数据分析工具也将让每个人有机会变成真正的“链上数据分析师”。

如今,数据的价值正在发生悄无声息但影响深远的改变。过去我们总将数据比为数字时代的石油或宝藏,但如今它逐渐成为如同水和空气一样的必需品。与石油或宝藏不同,水和空气是无处不在,但又始终开放与包容。相较于传统数据体系的封闭,链上数据凭借开放性与公共性,重新定义着数据要素的使用、生产、共享和价值创造模式,也逐渐成为 Web3.0 创新活动中不可或缺的“水和空气”。

 

Пов'язані матеріали

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

Daily Crypto Recap: Key Developments Institutional adoption continues: Coinbase partners with Standard Chartered to expand multi-currency fiat rails for institutions via Coinbase Prime, supporting AUD, SGD, CAD, CHF, EUR, and GBP. Meanwhile, Sharplink and Forward Industries, companies holding significant ETH and SOL reserves respectively, are set to be included in the Russell indexes, providing indirect crypto exposure to traditional index investors. Regulatory and compliance moves are in focus. Hong Kong's monetary authority announced new measures for investment accounts of mainland Chinese investors, including retroactive document checks to January 2023. Prediction market Polymarket is considering implementing KYC requirements to address sanctions and legal risks. Major financial players signal deeper involvement. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon suggested the bank might issue a stablecoin in the future. Concurrently, Falcon Finance and Anchorage Digital launched fUSD, a compliant, institution-focused stablecoin. Market sentiment presents a mixed picture. Bitmine's Tom Lee predicts an incoming crypto "supercycle," driven by Wall Street tokenization and AI agents, with Ethereum as a key beneficiary. However, a prominent trader cautions that the current period of investor losses may not be long enough to confirm a bear market bottom, and TD Cowen analysts note diminished chances for U.S. crypto market structure legislation this year due to a worsening political climate. Other notable news includes a16z crypto's observation that most tokenized assets are merely "digitized" and not actively used in DeFi, South Korea's crypto trading volume falling to about 8% of KOSPI's, and the Chinese Supreme Court stating it will research judicial rules for virtual currency cases.

链捕手10 хв тому

Morning News | Coinbase Partners with Standard Chartered to Expand Multi-Currency Fiat Channels; Sharplink and Forward to be Included in Russell Indices; JPMorgan May Issue Stablecoin in the Future

链捕手10 хв тому

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

For years, real estate tokenization has been hailed as a breakthrough technology poised to democratize property investment. In theory, it promises fractional ownership of premium assets, rapid transactions, and enhanced liquidity. Yet, in practice, it has failed to gain traction, accounting for less than 0.1% of the global real estate market. The core issue is not a lack of tokens, but the absence of a robust legal, operational, and compliant framework that grants them credibility as financial instruments. The industry initially erred by prioritizing technology over investor needs, creating products with unclear ownership and unreliable liquidity. Key infrastructure remains missing: legally sound ownership structures, compliant transfer mechanisms, professional servicing, and interoperability with traditional finance. This regulatory ambiguity and operational complexity deter institutional investors, who already have access to established, well-governed investment channels. A mature model would feature low minimum investments in institutional-grade assets, transparent rental income distribution, and genuine liquidity through regulated secondary markets. While regulatory progress in regions like the UAE and growth in other tokenized asset sectors (like treasuries) are positive signs, the focus must shift from issuing tokens to building foundational systems. The investment proposition of tokenized real estate is not to create new returns, but to improve access, efficiency, and liquidity for existing income-generating properties. For mainstream adoption, the sector must demonstrate tangible economic advantages over traditional models, not just technical novelty. The next phase depends on proving scalable, compliant operations with auditable track records. The barrier is no longer technology, but infrastructure and regulation. The vision remains unfulfilled until this gap is bridged.

marsbit14 хв тому

Sitting on a Trillion-Dollar Market, Why Hasn't Real Estate Tokenization Taken Off?

marsbit14 хв тому

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

The article discusses the ongoing challenge of defining and achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It notes that industry leaders have set vague, often profit- or time-based benchmarks for AGI, while the concept itself lacks a consensus definition—a situation the article compares to a "Rorschach test." It highlights a recent 2025 paper by researcher Michael Timothy Bennett, who proposes a new, measurable definition. Bennett frames AGI not as mimicking human performance on tests, which current large language models (LLMs) have already mastered, but as an "artificial scientist." A true AGI, according to this view, should be able to widely and efficiently adapt to new environments and tasks within real-world constraints (like computational and energy limits), focusing on the *discovery of new knowledge* rather than the replication of existing data. The author contrasts this with the current dominant approach of "scale-maxing"—massively scaling up data, parameters, and compute. While powerful, this method leads to models that fail on out-of-distribution problems and lack core intelligent abilities: they are passive learners, cannot reason causally, and cannot actively experiment or balance exploration with exploitation. The article argues that Bennett's framework offers a crucial shift. It makes AGI a quantifiable engineering problem and proposes new evaluation "adaptation benchmarks" that test an AI's ability to actively learn in novel scenarios. The conclusion is that achieving AGI will require a fundamental reset—a fusion of multiple methodologies beyond simple scaling, moving AI from mimicking patterns to embodying the scientific spirit of inquiry and discovery.

marsbit1 год тому

Large Language Models Ace All Exams, Yet Move Farther from AGI: What Does This Paper Reveal?

marsbit1 год тому

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

Pope Leo XIV's historic encyclical "Magnifica Humanitas," released in May 2026, marks the Catholic Church's first major document addressing artificial intelligence. The 40,000-word text moves beyond theological abstraction to confront practical AI anxieties affecting society. It argues that AI is no longer a mere tool but an embedded environment influencing daily decisions in areas like employment, healthcare, justice, and information, often without users' awareness. The encyclical presents ten core concerns. It highlights that the central issue isn't just regulation, but who holds the underlying *power*—control over data, compute, and platforms—often concentrated in private entities. It warns that even developers cannot fully explain AI systems, creating accountability gaps. While AI can simulate human interaction and creativity, it cautions against treating it as a moral agent capable of bearing true responsibility or forming genuine relationships. Key risks identified include AI's role in opaque decision-making for jobs or welfare, the amplification of persuasive disinformation, and the potential for education to focus on tool use over critical thinking. The document stresses that work has value beyond efficiency, and AI should enhance human capabilities, not merely replace roles. It firmly states that irreversible decisions, especially involving life and death, must remain under human judgment. Ultimately, the encyclical frames AI's challenge as anthropological, not just technological. As AI simulates uniquely human capacities like judgment and creation, it forces a re-examination of what makes human action meaningful: our capacity for responsibility, vulnerability, and bearing real consequences. The Pope concludes that technology is never neutral; its development and deployment are shaped by human values and choices, making an inclusive, ethically grounded dialogue essential for its future.

marsbit1 год тому

Pope Issues First AI Encyclical: 40,000 Words, 10 Key Points, Clarifying AI Anxiety

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片