EigenLayer 向创作者发空投,如何成为高质量内容创作者?

比推Опубліковано о 2024-09-29Востаннє оновлено о 2024-09-29

撰文:Haotian

来源:Foresight News


1/ 最近,有幸拿到了@eigenlayer 基金会 4,000 个 EIGEN 空投,其 Eligible 条件是要成为对社区有贡献的内容创作者,若后续更多项目方加入激励内容创作者的行列,新一轮的 TwitterFi 岂不是要来了?那如何才能成为项目方眼中的高质量 Content Creator 呢? 分享若干经验:



2/ 选准合适的输出方向。一级项目投研、二级交易机会分析、撸毛 hunter、宏观市场分析、链上数据指标解读等,各自门槛和商业转化路径都不一样。万不能每个方向都试图涉足,结果到头来四不像。有一些安全技术背景和 VC 从业经验的我,自然选择了项目投研方向,投研不难,但贵在长期的输出和价值沉淀。


3/ 找准要服务的精准用户群体。Crypto 市场很杂,有一心想搞钱的财富密码追逐者,也有长期追求行业增益的 Builder,以及随市场热点摇摆的小白等,想清楚要服务哪群人。推荐财富密码容易翻车,一味追逐热点容易被镰刀利用,我选择了服务 Builder 群体,尽管这群人很少参与互动,但长期的知识贡献会被记得。


4/ 要找到自己专属的内容风格和调性。有人能把八卦故事讲的很传神,有人能把投资标的梳理的入骨三分,有人能透过链上数据挖掘投资机会,而我选择了「技术 + 商业」的独特视角,目的是把生僻的技术概念讲得通俗易懂。做到这一点不容易,但输出生僻技术的过程,自身的学习提升和对行业的贡献激励成就感满满。


5/ 不要一味追求流量。IP>影响力>流量,Crypto 现阶段存在严重价值观错位,高质量内容、影响力、流量并非正相关,把握不好容易迷失。持续高质量内容可以潜移默化成为你的 IP,万不能一味流量而忽略内容调性。我经常缺席很多八卦掐架话题讨论,但行业出现新潮技术和趋势,相信那个「硬核男人」一定会出现。


6/ 保持纯粹的技术追求和专注度。万不能今天市场情绪好,研究 ZK、zkVM、AI Coprocessor、FHE,明天市场情绪萧条了,又跟着韭菜高喊技术都是「骗局」。技术始终都是纯粹的,通晓技术发展和行业趋势未必都能转化成财富,但长期看「技术」认知能提升你跨周期的能力和财富短期暴增的概率,别问我怎么知道的。


7/ 敏锐的视角和批判性的洞察很重要。KOL并非一个刻板的标签,更是一份对行业和粉丝群体的责任,情绪持续低迷时,保持对行业乐观并跳出来摇旗,情绪 Fomo 高涨时,能沉着冷静发出对一些危险因素的批判。当然,要有符合自身价值判断的切入时机选择,因为一不小心就掉入了「断人财路」和「助纣为虐」的陷阱。


8/ 技术审美很重要,但不要有偏见。Crypto 市场并不是纯技术推动的,创新范式、MeMe 文化、FOMO 炒作都可能引领一波宏大的财富和认知大洗牌,一定门槛的技术 Sense,会让你筛掉一些低质量的项目方和话题,保护有限的注意力,不是排斥接受新事物的理由。有「审美」追求,但同样也要适当迎合市场的选择。


9/ 影响力「变现」和价值「贡献」不冲突。高质量内容变现的路径有很多,付费订阅、项目 Ambassador、机构 advisor、付费广告,Grant 资助等等,若能坚守每一篇内容的高质量,每一次输出的客观理性,「价值贡献」就是很好的外衣,如果总被诟病发广子,一定要反思下是不是「内容」本身忽略了价值性。



10/ 做交易和做高质量内容难兼顾。做内容是苦行僧的活,需要沉住气不被二级市场情绪裹挟,得到的是输出后的自驱精神激励。而做交易则是频繁试错和修炼心性的结果,情绪波动很难避免,得到的是财富增值的多巴胺分泌快感。要同时保持高质量创作和交易大神形象很难。交易能力对内容创作者者是附加值。


11/ 有对重大叙事和趋势的洞察和延伸思考。市场上出现的模块化、链抽象、AI+Web3、并行 EVM、zkVM、AVS、Preconf 等叙事话题是 VC、开发者、用户等市场共同推动的行业脉络。而叙事背后的逻辑框架和趋势演变,需要时刻保持推进思考和价值引导,引导或批判都对趋势演变有直接价值。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

The Perfect Founder-Market Fit: Bear Markets Are the Ultimate Test

"Founder-Market Fit in a Bear Market: The Ultimate Test" While AI captures the vast majority of venture capital and attention, the current crypto bear market is revealing the strongest cohort of founders in four cycles. These operators, hailing from institutions like Goldman Sachs, Citadel, and Stripe, are not chasing narratives. They are converging on the now-compelling "hard problem" of institutional-grade financial infrastructure. Founder-market fit—the alignment between a specific founder's unique capabilities and a specific market's needs—is the most durable signal in venture. Products, markets, and regulations change, but this fit compounds even when prices don't. The bear market is the best environment to identify it. Talent is now concentrated on two serious verticals: AI and fintech. The quality of founders choosing blockchain for finance is unprecedented. Evidence is in who's building: founders from elite traditional finance backgrounds are tackling on-chain institutional infrastructure (e.g., Ondo's Nathan Allman, Offchain Labs' Ed Felten). Market data supports this shift, with tokenized real-world assets and stablecoins growing significantly and major banks launching products. The author evaluates founders on four traits: 1) Deep domain expertise (lived experience, not just theory), 2) High agency (ability to sell a vision based on deep market understanding), 3) Unfair network advantage (relationships that accelerate execution), and 4) Obsession (long-term commitment rooted in belief, not hype). In a bull market, momentum does the work. A bear market strips that away, leaving only belief—the observable output of true founder-market fit—as fuel. This period filters out tourists, leaving builders who see the long-term opportunity. For serious operators considering the space, the bear market is not a risk but a proving ground and the cleanest environment to build compounding advantage. The commitment is to back such founders at the intersection of market and conviction, as in every prior cycle.

marsbit7 хв тому

The Perfect Founder-Market Fit: Bear Markets Are the Ultimate Test

marsbit7 хв тому

Shing-Tung Yau Invites Wang Hong and Deng Yu to Teach Back Home, After 20 Years of Rivalry, Tsinghua and Peking University Realize the Opponent Isn't Each Other

On July 23, the Fields Medal, the highest global mathematics award, was awarded to two Chinese mathematicians, Wang Hong and Deng Yu, both undergraduate classmates from Peking University's class of 2007. This marks the first time mathematicians who completed their undergraduate studies in mainland China have won the prize, with two laureates in the same year. Following the announcement, renowned mathematician Shing-Tung Yau publicly invited Wang and Deng to return to China to teach at Tsinghua University's Qiuzhen College. This invitation is the latest episode in a decades-long rivalry between Tsinghua and Peking University (PKU) for supremacy in Chinese mathematics. The competition traces back to a 1952 national university restructuring that transferred Tsinghua's entire mathematics department to PKU, leaving Tsinghua without a math program for nearly 30 years until its reinstatement in 1979. The rivalry intensified in 2005 with a public falling-out between Yau and his former student, PKU professor Gang Tian. Subsequently, Yau shifted his efforts to building Tsinghua's mathematics program from the ground up. He established the Yau Mathematical Sciences Center in 2009 and founded the Qiuzhen College in 2021, implementing an elite, accelerated "Math Leadership Program" to recruit prodigies as young as middle school students. The competition spans multiple fronts: recruiting top junior high and high school students from math olympiads, luring renowned scholars from overseas, and securing research funding. A new and fierce battleground has emerged in AI and mathematical reasoning. Both universities are heavily investing in AI research to enhance large language models' mathematical capabilities, with Tsinghua collaborating on projects like the STARE algorithm and PKU developing specialized models for geometry. Despite the intense competition, this rivalry has arguably elevated China's overall standing in mathematics. Chinese mathematicians now frequently publish in top journals and win major international awards. At the recent 17th Yau College Students Mathematics Contests, PKU students swept the top individual awards. Yau, presenting the awards, emphasized the need for inter-university collaboration to advance Chinese mathematics. The landscape is now shifting with the rise of AI in mathematical research. As AI begins to generate proofs at an unprecedented rate, the traditional metrics of competition between institutions may become less relevant. The future for mathematicians, as noted by Terence Tao, is navigating an era of "proof surplus" driven by AI, presenting a new common challenge that transcends university rivalries.

marsbit14 хв тому

Shing-Tung Yau Invites Wang Hong and Deng Yu to Teach Back Home, After 20 Years of Rivalry, Tsinghua and Peking University Realize the Opponent Isn't Each Other

marsbit14 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片