解读 Messari 代币解锁报告:新增 5% 的流通量会显著影响币价,11 月第 1 周将出现最大解锁

深潮Опубліковано о 2024-09-18Востаннє оновлено о 2024-09-18

有些趋势值得注意,比如,高度期待的大规模解锁可能会引发意外的市场反应。

作者:Stacy Muur

编译:深潮TechFlow

几周前,Messari 发布了他们的深入报告《不要低头:应对解锁的市场策略》,该报告分析了流通供应增加对市场的影响。

本文总结了他们研究的主要发现,并提供了关于跟踪解锁事件的背景信息和建议。

Messari 的报告:主要亮点

Messari 的分析师分析了 41 种资产的 619 次解锁事件的数据,以识别市场对流通供应增加的反应模式。大多数事件涉及流通供应的增加不足 2.5%,而超过 5% 的解锁事件不到一半。

数据来源:Token Unlocks,截至 9 月 16 日的数据

加密代币很少单独交易,它们的价格受到市场情绪、新产品发布和叙事变化等因素的影响。尽管代币解锁通常对代币价格相对于 BTC 有负面影响,但情况并非总是如此。

不过,有些趋势值得注意:

  • 至少 5% 的流通供应解锁往往会显著影响代币的表现;

  • 代币通常在解锁事件前后七天内表现较差;

  • 新产品发布、行业表现优异和其他催化因素可以影响解锁日期周围的典型行为;

  • 高度期待的大规模解锁可能会引发意外的市场反应;

  • 每月有大量解锁的代币在长期内难以超越其他山寨币;

跟踪解锁事件

在跟踪解锁时,我常用 Messari 仪表板。不过,其他值得注意的解锁追踪工具还包括 Token UnlocksDefiLlama.。

在 Messari 上,最重要的即将到来的解锁事件包括:

  • $ONDO:在 3 个月内供应量增加 268%;

  • $OMNI:在 7 个月内供应量增加 154%;

  • $PRCL:在 7 个月内供应量增加 121%;

  • $JITO:在 2.5 个月内供应量增加 108%;

  • $TNSR:在 7 个月内供应量增加 96%;

  • $TIA:在 1.5 个月内供应量增加 83%;

  • $PYTH:在 8 个月内供应量增加 58%;

  • $PORTAL:在 2 周内供应量增加 15.7%;

  • $MAV:在 3 周内供应量增加 14.5%;

  • $ZETA:在 2 周内供应量增加 11%;

DeFiLlama 提供了以下数据:

  • $BIGTIME:在 3 周内供应增加 61%;

  • $CYBER:在 1 个月内供应增加 69%;

  • $HOLD:在 2 个月内供应增加 38%;

  • $LVL:在 3 个月内供应增加 19%;

  • $BB:在 7 个月内供应增加 100%;

监测通货膨胀

另一个重要的指标是每日代币的发行量和发行率变化。在这方面,Messari 再次提供了很大的帮助,他们的每日线性发行率最大变化仪表板非常实用。

重要事件将导致通货膨胀增加:

  • $TIA 将在 1.5 个月内开始发行;

  • $JITO 将在 3 个月内将每日发行增加 8 倍;

  • $DYM 将在 4.5 个月内将每日发行增加 3.8 倍;

重要事件将导致通货膨胀降低:

  • UNI 将在本周停止新的发行,与 RON 和 $XVS(下周停止新发行)相同;

  • $WOO 将在 1.5 个月内减少 75% 的发行量;

  • $NEAR 将在 1 个月内减少 38% 的发行量;

根据 Token Unlocks,11 月的第一周将出现最高的新发行量,预计将有 14 亿美元流入市场。

总结

代币解锁是做出投资或交易决策时需要考虑的众多因素之一。其他重要因素还包括新产品发布、整体市场情绪和流动性。通常,当解锁事件发生时,其影响已经反映在市场价格中,因此在解锁日期做空代币并不是一个可靠的策略。

当解锁规模超过流通供应的 5% 到 10% 且没有即将到来的催化剂或对代币的关注度不高时,影响最为显著。

Пов'язані матеріали

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

"Investors are pouring billions into Chinese AI startups with no profits, betting on the future of the industry. A state-backed fund is reportedly in talks to lead DeepSeek's funding at a $45B valuation, just weeks after it was valued at $10B. Along with companies like Zhipu AI, MiniMax, and Kimi (backed by Meituan and Alibaba), their combined valuation exceeds $140B. This isn't a typical venture capital play. Investors are paying for 'future definition rights'—a chance to set the standards for the next tech era. Morgan Stanley notes a 6-12 month window for this scarcity premium before more AI companies go public. Despite massive losses, these companies show strong growth. Zhipu AI's API revenue grew 60x, Kimi's annual recurring revenue doubled to $200M in a month, and MiniMax turned its gross margin positive, with over 70% of revenue from overseas. Their valuations vastly exceed profitable firms like iFlytek. Crucially, technical progress underpins this growth. DeepSeek's latest model boasts costs just 1% of a leading competitor's, while Zhipu AI has raised API prices due to high demand. However, gaps with top global models remain. Tech giants like Tencent and Alibaba, investing heavily while describing their own AI efforts as 'leaky boats,' are also investing in these startups as a hedge. Key risks loom: the closing scarcity window, computing power bottlenecks limiting growth, and the sustainability of DeepSeek's cost-advantage model. With state capital now a major player, the success of these companies has become a strategic national concern. The next year will test if their soaring valuations can be justified by future profits."

marsbit29 хв тому

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

marsbit29 хв тому

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

On May 22, the U.S. SEC postponed the release of a key "innovation exemption" draft that would have permitted crypto-native platforms to issue and trade tokenized U.S. stocks on decentralized venues without full traditional exchange compliance. This would have legalized a "third-party token" model used overseas, where platforms issue tokens tracking stock prices without the underlying company's involvement, raising unresolved questions about shareholder rights, dividends, and sanctions enforcement. Meanwhile, the SEC had already approved a different, compliant path for tokenization led by Nasdaq and NYSE. Their model integrates tokenized stocks into existing settlement systems (like DTCC), preserving all shareholder rights. This creates a fundamental conflict: crypto platforms seek a permissionless, 24/7 on-chain parallel market, while traditional exchanges advocate for an upgraded, regulated version of the current system. Intense lobbying from traditional exchange groups like the World Federation of Exchanges argued the exemption would create an unfair regulatory advantage and dilute investor protection. Even some compliant crypto firms favored delay. Internally, SEC commissioners were divided on the scope and pace of the exemption. The delay highlights a critical policy crossroads. With significant trading volume already occurring overseas, the SEC's decision will determine whether the U.S. embraces a dual-track system for tokenized equities or sidelines itself from an emerging global infrastructure. The core unresolved question remains the legal status and rights of holders of third-party tokenized stocks. The SEC paused because the draft framework risked creating a major new asset class with profound, unanswered legal implications.

marsbit37 хв тому

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

marsbit37 хв тому

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

The article discusses concerns about a potential "super IPO wave" hitting the U.S. stock market, with major companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic preparing to go public. While these large IPOs could collectively raise hundreds of billions, raising fears of a market "blood drain," analysis suggests the impact may be limited. Key points include: * Historical data shows IPO waves often coincide with strong market returns, as they typically occur during periods of high investor demand. * Model estimates suggest even the largest IPOs might only cause a market dip of around 1%. They are more likely to trigger a routine market pullback rather than end a bull market. * The current demand side remains supportive due to high household cash balances, strong corporate earnings growth, continued stock fund inflows, and robust share buyback announcements. * The main risk lies in concentrated investor positions, particularly in large-cap tech stocks, which are at elevated levels. A shift in funds towards new issuances could pressure these crowded sectors. * Recent fund flows show strength concentrated in U.S. and tech stocks, while other regions like Europe and Japan are experiencing outflows. The conclusion is that the IPO wave itself is unlikely to crash the market unless it coincides with a weakening in underlying demand factors like earnings or fund inflows into U.S. equities. The focus should be on whether demand can continue to absorb the new supply.

marsbit43 хв тому

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit43 хв тому

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

Vitalik Buterin recently published an extensive article addressing core concerns about Ethereum's future direction and the role of the Ethereum Foundation (EF). He clarifies that the EF is not his personal domain nor the central authority of Ethereum; it operates as just one node within the broader ecosystem. The board makes collective decisions, with significant operational work led by Aya Miyaguchi, allowing Vitalik to focus on technical matters. The article critiques the perception that the EF should act like a conventional, fast-moving tech company. Buterin warns that merely chasing higher TPS, lower latency, or better marketing—like other chains—risks diluting Ethereum's foundational values. He draws a parallel to Google's evolution away from its "Don't be evil" ethos. Instead, the EF's renewed mandate is to focus on preserving and strengthening Ethereum's core principles, summarized as CROPS: **C**ensorship-resistance, **R**esistance to capture, **O**pen source, **P**rivacy, and **S**ecurity. The foundation will concentrate its limited resources (holding only ~0.16% of ETH) on these long-term, non-commercializable fundamentals, while ecosystem growth, applications, and market-facing activities should be driven by external teams and capital. Buterin outlines key technical priorities aligned with this vision: 1) Advancing formal verification to mathematically prove the absence of bugs; 2) Enhancing consensus security to maintain operation without reliance on social coordination during outages; and 3) Reducing dependency on intermediaries (like RPCs) to strengthen user sovereignty and privacy. He acknowledges ETH as Ethereum's most valuable asset, crucial for security, but stresses that promoting its value is a task for the wider ecosystem, not the EF. Ultimately, Buterin's message is a strategic refocus: the EF will become a smaller, more focused entity guarding Ethereum's essential, harder-to-achieve properties, ensuring it remains distinct not just in performance but in its commitment to decentralization, resistance, and security.

marsbit47 хв тому

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

marsbit47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片