美国公司Lingo Telecom因人工智能生成的拜登机器人电话面临100万美元罚款

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-22Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-23

币界网报道:

总部位于美国的语音服务提供商Lingo Telecom已同意与美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)达成100万美元的和解协议。该公司被指控为影响2024年新罕布什尔州初选选民的人工智能自动电话提供便利。

2024年1月21日,新罕布什尔州的许多公民被类似乔·拜登总统声音的电话恐吓。这些自动电话告诉目标,在该州总统初选中投票将导致他们在11月大选中被剥夺选举权。这个声音是用一个模仿乔·拜登的假低沉声音录制的,该声音使用了深度学习算法。

Lingo Telecom面临处罚和合规措施

这次行动是由政治战略家史蒂夫·克莱默(Steve Kramer)进行的,他说,目的不是影响选举,而是说明人工智能是多么危险。然而,克莱默的行为具有潜在的不利影响,向选民提供了虚假信息,并对选举的公平性构成了威胁。Lingo Telecom的技术被用于这一过程,因为它方便了将这些信息发送给相关人员。

根据和解协议,Lingo Telecom将不得不支付100万美元的民事罚款,而联邦通信委员会则希望该公司支付200万美元。该公司还被要求制定一个强有力的合规计划,其中包括遵守美国联邦通信委员会的STIR/SHAKEN呼叫者身份验证框架。

此框架试图解决呼叫者ID欺骗问题。这是在robocall活动中使用的,让电话看起来像是来自其他合法号码。

美国联邦通信委员会还强调,这一和解是向参与此类活动或为此类活动提供便利的其他公司发出强烈信息的关键。Lingo Telecom虽然接受和解,但强烈批评了联邦通信委员会的行为,称监管机构正试图引入具有追溯力的新规则。

FCC官员强调人工智能语音克隆在选举中的危险

美国联邦通信委员会执法局局长Loyaan Egal指出,通过呼叫者ID欺骗和人工智能语音克隆进行冒充是非常危险的,特别是在选举期间。埃加勒指出,这些技术可能被追求政治议程的国家行为者或意图干预该国政治进程的外国行为者滥用。

制造机器人电话的政治顾问史蒂夫·克莱默正面临更严重的后果。联邦通信委员会提议对克莱默处以600万美元的罚款,克莱默还可能因压制选民的指控面临最高7年的监禁。

此外,克莱默还可能因冒充政治候选人而被判处一年监禁。这些指控描述了当局如何处理此案,并将其视为在政治中使用人工智能所带来风险的一个明显例子。

非营利组织Public Citizen的联合主席Robert Weissman对美国联邦通信委员会在这种情况下的行动表示欢迎,称deepfakes对“我们的民主构成了生存威胁”

Пов'язані матеріали

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit45 хв тому

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit45 хв тому

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手53 хв тому

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手53 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片