超越市值:“解锁供应”提供更深入的见解

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-22Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-22

币界网报道:

流通供应是加密代币估值的常见指标,通常隐藏着关键细节。Token Unlocks通过引入解锁供应来解决这个问题,这是一种更准确的估计未来代币可用性的方法。

循环供应的问题在于它依赖于自我报告的数据和不频繁的更新。这可能会导致重大差异,使投资者难以真实了解代币的价值。

由于缺乏通用的报告标准,流通供应的准确性可能会有很大差异。此外,跟踪流通供应的方法,如钱包移动和估计,可能已经过时。有时它们只每月更新一次,导致报告的数字存在很大差异。

为了解决这些问题,Token Unlocks引入了一个新的指标:解锁供应。与可能落后的流通供应不同,解锁供应使用行权时间表来更准确地估计未来的代币供应。这让投资者对可能的市场变化有所了解,而且这种方法提供了一种更结构化、更准确的方法来估计未来的代币供应,为投资者提供了潜在市场变化的领先指标。

无锁定供应的主要好处之一是它能够作为预警系统。通过提供每日或每周更新的粒度数据,它允许用户预测尚未反映在流通供应指标中的代币发行。此外,将解锁供应与循环供应进行比较可以作为一种验证工具,有助于确保项目团队提供的数据的准确性。

然而,无锁供应并非没有挑战。该指标可能受到代币销毁、激励计划、DAO决策和生态系统赠款等动态因素的影响。这些元素通常在项目白皮书或代币生成事件(TGE)之后引入,可以改变预期的供应。

要真正理解一个项目的代币经济学,你需要同时考虑循环供应和解锁供应。它们共同提供了更清晰的供应动态图,帮助每个人在不断变化的加密世界中做出更明智的决策。

Пов'язані матеріали

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

In a concentrated move over the past week, several Wall Street giants have advanced their tokenized money market fund initiatives, signaling a strategic shift driven by impending U.S. stablecoin regulations. JPMorgan Chase launched its second such fund, JLTXX, on Ethereum, explicitly targeting future stablecoin issuer reserve needs. Concurrently, Franklin Templeton partnered with Kraken to integrate its BENJI tokenized funds onto the exchange platform for use as collateral and cash management tools. BlackRock further solidified its position by filing for two new tokenized funds with the SEC, aiming to convert its massive traditional stablecoin custody business into a tokenized model. These parallel developments represent a multi-pronged institutional "compliance hunt" to capture future crypto liquidity. BlackRock and JPMorgan are focusing on the backend, preparing to serve as the core reserve and settlement infrastructure for compliant stablecoins as outlined by the GENIUS Act. This act defines strict "qualified reserve asset" requirements for stablecoin backing while prohibiting interest payments to holders. Franklin Templeton and Kraken, however, are exploiting a potential regulatory gap. By offering a tokenized fund (BENJI) that is not a stablecoin, they aim to provide yield-bearing, collateralizable digital cash instruments, circumventing GENIUS Act's ban on stablecoin yield. The impending CLARITY Act, which will delineate digital asset market structure, is seen as a complementary piece to GENIUS. Its treatment of passive income could solidify the niche for instruments like BENJI. With conservative market size estimates for tokenized money market funds reaching hundreds of billions by 2030, Wall Street institutions are positioning themselves early, using on-chain settlement as a key competitive differentiator to offer superior liquidity and composability for the next generation of dollar reserves.

marsbit56 хв тому

Wall Street's 'Compliance Hunt': The Great Stablecoin Reserve Migration

marsbit56 хв тому

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

In a California court, Sam Altman testified for the first time in the ongoing legal battle between Elon Musk and OpenAI. Altman made a striking claim: Musk once suggested that control of OpenAI could one day be passed down to his children. This statement reframes the long-standing conflict not as a simple governance dispute but as a foundational power struggle. Altman sought to counter the narrative that OpenAI betrayed its original non-profit, idealistic mission. He argued that from the beginning, it was Musk who sought increasing control over the organization, including a larger equity stake and ultimate decision-making authority. Altman opposed this, citing OpenAI's core principle that AGI should not be controlled by any single individual. He also addressed the key point of contention about OpenAI's shift to a for-profit structure, claiming Musk was aware of and initially supportive of exploring such a model to secure the massive funding needed for advanced AI research. Altman framed the change as a practical necessity, not a betrayal. Further testimony revealed internal concerns after Musk left OpenAI's board, with worries he might take retaliatory action. Altman critiqued Musk's management style as unsuitable for a research lab, damaging morale and culture. Throughout his testimony, Altman's focus appeared to shift from technological idealism to the realities of organizational governance and resource requirements. Regarding his brief ouster in 2023, Altman stated he seriously considered joining Microsoft but ultimately returned because OpenAI was too important to abandon.

marsbit1 год тому

Altman Drops Bombshell While Musk is Away: He Once Wanted His Children to Inherit OpenAI

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片