这就是Aptos交易量飙升3500%的原因

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-14Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-14

币界网报道:

8月13日,一层网络Aptos在记录5160万笔交易后,其日交易量增长了3570%。交易量的激增是由于推出了新版本的点击赚钱游戏Tapos 2。

5月份第一个版本的推出也导致了Aptos活动的类似激增。该网络实现了当时有史以来最高的每日交易量,达到1.154亿笔交易,每秒峰值交易量(TPS)为32000 TPS。

Tapos的采用凸显了Aptos的优势

继最近创纪录的交易之后,Aptos的日交易量现在占第一层网络有史以来前三大交易量中的两个。该网络5月25日的1.154亿笔交易仍然是有史以来最高的,其次是Sui network的6500万笔。

Aptos区块链由前Facebook工程师于2022年推出,作为以太坊和Solana等第一代智能合约网络的更好替代品。虽然它已经显示出更高的容量,但该网络尚未得到广泛采用。

然而,Tapos Cat和其他去中心化应用程序的到来为该平台带来了新一波用户。Tapos Cat是一款点击赚钱游戏,用户通过点击虚拟猫获得$HEART代币。虽然游戏吸引了汽油费,但可以忽略不计,前72小时的游戏时间是免费的,这鼓励了更多的用户尝试。

有趣的是,大量的交易并没有影响网络的交易成本。即使处理更多交易,其天然气费用仍然非常低。这突显了该网络作为一个可扩展的第一层合约的优势,无论链上活动如何,都能实现高性能。

今年它的采用率有所提高,2024年有2000万独立用户,已经处理了超过10亿笔交易。更多的DeFi协议正在网络上推出,导致其总价值锁定(TVL)今年翻了一番。

APTOS努力追赶以太坊和Solana,因为APT代币举步维艰

尽管吞吐量很高,但该网络能否与以太坊和Solana等老牌巨头竞争仍值得怀疑。根据Defillama的数据,其3.8917亿美元的TVL在所有第1层和第2层区块链中排名第20位。

Aptos的粉丝相信这会发生,并指出其TPS比以太坊高50倍,比基础网络高10倍。然而,这可能需要一段时间,因为它没有先发优势,而且它的编程语言Move相对较新。

Aptos交易量与以太坊和Base的对比——TokenTerminal

与此同时,Aptos区块链活动的激增对今天的Aptos代币APT价格产生了积极影响,从6.595美元上涨到6.953美元。然而,收益是短暂的,该代币现在与其他市场一起下跌了2.5%。

尽管价格下跌,APT仍然是过去七天表现最好的资产之一,上涨了32.5%。投资者希望该代币能够更长时间地保持这种积极势头,从而扭转2024年的糟糕表现。今年迄今为止,该代币已下跌32.5%。

其表现不佳是由于几个因素造成的,但最大的原因是APT代币的多次解锁,供应量增加。自2024年5月以来,该项目已在每月11日和12日解锁1131万个代币,并将持续到2026年10月。

Пов'язані матеріали

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit34 хв тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit34 хв тому

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片