卡玛拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)竞选团队表示“齐心协力”理解加密货币:Circle首席执行官

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-14Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-14

币界网报道:

Circle首席执行官Jeremy Allaire表示,美国副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯的总统竞选团队正在努力更好地了解加密货币行业,这标志着在这方面的“协同努力”。

这位稳定币大亨周三表示,他上周参加了Zoom会议,该会议汇集了加密货币领导人和白宫官员,其中一些人包括未具名的“哈里斯人”

Allaire在接受CNBC采访时表示:“我可以说,政府和哈里斯竞选团队都在共同努力,真正了解问题、参与者、行业、政策问题等。”。

他继续说道:“我认为,该行业正在寻找的——非常非常明确——是明确的声明。”。“现有白宫可能会发表明确的声明,哈里斯也会发表明确声明,作为其经济政策议程的一部分。”

截至今天,加密货币选民只能猜测哈里斯对数字资产的看法。这位已故民主党候选人的替代者没有谈论比特币或其他加密货币的记录,虽然有人猜测她是否会在7月纳什维尔举行的年度比特币大会上迟到,但她最终没有出现。

但她至少对加密货币持开放态度的小迹象正在出现。亿万富翁企业家Mark Cuban是上周会议的另一名与会者,他在7月告诉Decrypt,哈里斯竞选团队向他提出了关于加密货币的“多个问题”。

库班当时表示:“我得到的反馈是,她将对商业、(人工智能)、加密货币和政府服务更加开放,但肯定没有得到副总裁的证实。”。

然而,她的行为可能表明情况并非如此。据彭博社报道,哈里斯已经聘请了Brian Deese和Bharat Rhamamurti来帮助她制定经济政策,这两位前拜登助手帮助领导了他的政府的大部分反加密努力。

Allaire在谈到拜登政府时说:“他们让美国的工作机会流向海外,他们让在这个领域建造房屋的成本变得极其高昂。”。“他们创造了一种政策由法院而不是国会裁决的局面。”

在过去的一个月里,哈里斯逐渐成为加密货币投注者中赢得11月大选的最爱,这反映了全国民意调查的变化。

鉴于她的对手唐纳德·特朗普被认为对该行业更有利,伯恩斯坦的分析师怀疑比特币的价格正在下跌,这与他当选几率的下降直接相关。

安德鲁·海沃德编辑

Пов'язані матеріали

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit38 хв тому

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit38 хв тому

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片