Shiba Inu价格分析：SHIB牛市能否突破1700万美元的阻力位？

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-10Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-10

币界网报道：

Shiba Inu的价格从周一的市场崩盘中反弹了25%，8月8日达到0.000014美元。然而，链上数据显示，583万SHIB的抛售墙如何威胁到复苏阶段。

Shiba Inu 25%的价格反弹停止在0.000014美元

Shiba Inu（SHIB）在最近的市场动荡中表现出了韧性，从8月5日的重大市场崩盘中反弹了25%。

在低点0.000011美元之后，SHIB在8月8日飙升至0.000014美元，这是由一系列看涨催化剂推动的，包括ETF流入、对Ripple的1.25亿美元罚款以及俄罗斯决定将加密货币挖矿合法化。然而，随着SHIB接近0.000014美元的阻力位，看涨势头开始减弱。

Shiba Inu价格行动SHIBUSD | TradingView

最近SHIB价格的上涨可以追溯到这些催化剂，这些催化剂在更广泛的加密货币市场上产生了乐观情绪。受益于整个行业的反弹，Shiba Inu的价格在短短三天内从8月5日的低点上涨了近33%，达到8月8日的高点。

价格图显示，在大幅上涨之后，SHIB遇到了0.000014美元左右的强劲阻力位，大量卖出订单开始累积。

剩余卖出订单阻碍牛市势头

尽管最初的看涨情绪，但自周一市场崩盘以来，现有卖出订单的高发生率似乎正在抵消这一积极势头。在过去的24小时里，SHIB经历了4%的回调，从最近的0.000014美元高点回落。这一调整发生在SHIB无法突破阻力位的时候，这与大盘资产在反弹期间触及阻力点导致的更广泛的市场回落相吻合。

交易所订单簿显示，几天前还在控制局面的空头仍然持有大量卖出订单，阻碍了SHIB突破0.000015美元。

Shiba Inu订购书SHIBUSD | IntoTheBlock

Shiba Inu（SHIB）的链上市场深度图显示看跌前景，卖出订单超过买入订单。以0.000014美元的平均价格计算，卖出订单中约有5.43万亿SHIB，而买入订单中有3.03万亿SHIC，两者之间存在2.4万亿SHIB的负差，即约1700万美元。

这种需求下降表明缺乏强有力的购买支持，如果这种趋势持续下去，可能会导致价格进一步下跌。

Shiba Inu价格预测：突破0.00015美元可能带来更多收益

价格图上的布林带表明，SHIB目前在较低的区间附近交易，表明其处于超卖状态，这可能预示着潜在的反弹。相对强弱指数（RSI）也暗示可能出现看涨逆转，因为它徘徊在超卖区域附近。

如果SHIB能够维持在0.000013美元的支撑位，买家介入以吸收抛售压力，价格可能会重新测试0.000015美元的阻力位。成功突破这一水平可能会为进一步上涨打开大门，下一个阻力点约为0.000018美元。

Shiba Inu价格预测SHIBUSD | TradingView

然而，如果未能守住0.000013美元的支撑位，SHIB可能会重新测试之前发现强烈买入兴趣的0.000012美元水平。

总之，虽然技术指标表明可能会有更多上行空间，但SHIB突破0.000015美元阻力位的能力可能取决于更广泛的市场情绪，以及是否会出现任何新的看涨消息来抵消现有的抛售压力。如果这些条件得到满足，SHIB的价格走势可能会再次上涨。

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit49 хв тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit49 хв тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手50 хв тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手50 хв тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit3 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit3 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手4 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手4 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit5 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни SHIB (SHIB).