716200亿美元的未保险存款在美国银行账户中酝酿,因为客户面临联邦政府的零保护风险:报告

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-09Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

根据联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)的一份秘密报告,美国人的银行账户中持有高达7.162万亿美元的未投保现金。

该机构表示,3月底获得的数据显示,自2021年第四季度以来,美国银行中未受保护的现金数量首次增加。

美国银行与联邦存款保险公司保持一致,向客户承诺,在破产的情况下,最高25万美元的存款将始终得到保障。但超出部分不投保。

联邦存款保险公司正在加强对这一问题的审查,警告说,没有保险的存款可能会使贷款人更容易受到银行挤兑的影响。

“虽然许多银行增加了对无保险存款的依赖,但这一趋势在最大的银行中最为明显。

大型银行中无保险存款的日益集中,使银行系统可能更容易受到2023年3月等储户挤兑的影响。”

去年硅谷银行、Signature银行和第一共和国银行倒闭时,FDIC的25万美元上限受到了考验。

历史上第一次,银行的所有存款都受到联邦政府的保护,联邦存款保险公司的保险和系统性风险例外的特殊使用相结合,赋予了联邦存款保险委员会、美联储和财政部支持一切的权力。

危机发生后,联邦存款保险公司表示,它现在要求美国银行提供有关有保险和无保险存款构成的全面数据,以提高其跟踪和管理风险的能力。

不要错过任何节拍-订阅以直接将电子邮件提醒发送到您的收件箱

检查价格操作

在X、Facebook和Telegram上关注我们

冲浪每日Hodl混合

生成的图像:Midjourney

Пов'язані матеріали

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit33 хв тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit33 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片