回顾PlusToken案 加密市场如何再次被其牵动敏感神经

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-09Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-09

币界网报道:

作者:Revc,

一、前言

加密市场情绪还未在8月6日的暴跌中恢复,而8月7日一则关于Plustoken消息,再次牵动加密市场的敏感神经。

据Lookonchain的监测,数百个已经休眠了3.3年的钱包开始转移大批量的以太坊(ETH),可能涉及789,533枚ETH,约合20亿美元。链上追踪显示,这些资金来自一个名为“Plus Token Ponzi 2”的钱包。该钱包在2020年将789,533枚ETH分散到数千个钱包中,此后自2021年4月以来一直未有任何动静。

据链上分析师余烬监测,Plustoken相关钱包大部分已在2021年被出售,目前归集的仅有25,757枚 ETH。随即市场情绪获得安抚。

随后Arkham在X平台表示,Plustoken钱包与数十个钱包相关联,仅在过去12小时内就转移了4.647亿美元的ETH。

二、PlusToken事件梳理

案件背景

PlusToken 于2018年5月推出,声称是一个多功能跨链去中心化钱包和“智能狗搬砖”套利平台。通过宣传“币王”、“千倍币”、“8个月上涨82倍”等吸引眼球的口号,迅速吸引了大量投资者加入。该平台利用传销模式,通过推荐码邀请新会员,并要求缴纳至少500美元的加密货币作为门槛,以获取平台收益。

发展过程

2018年5月:PlusToken 推出

平台以“区块链钱包”和“智能搬砖”为幌子,吸引大量投资者。仅一年时间,注册会员数达到270万,最大层级达到3293层。

2019年6月27日:提现问题暴露,运营停滞

PlusToken 开始无法正常提现,引发了投资者的恐慌。尽管平台官方未对此作出解释,部分投资者依然选择相信平台,导致更多资金继续涌入。在平台停止运营后,Plustoken 账户仍然收到价值1.5亿人民币的加密货币,

2020年11月26日:二审宣判

2020年11月26日,江苏省盐城市中级人民法院对PlusToken案进行了二审判决,裁定没收该案中扣押的加密货币,并将所得资金及收益依法上缴国库。

三、资金去向

PlusToken通过庞氏骗局骗取了全球投资者20亿至29亿美元的加密货币。该平台主要依赖场外交易(OTC)渠道进行大规模的资金进出,并通过复杂的链上资产转移和混币服务来规避追踪。部分资金被用于购置房产和豪车,而其他部分则通过OTC市场变现。

2020年6月,78.95万枚以太坊(ETH),当时价值约1.919亿美元,从一个PlusToken钱包中被转移,并通过数百个中介钱包进行分散转移。

5SwrrMrJh4ksF2wadyoZc8amLZBlEkcbGKdtt4kG.png

在2021年6月至9月期间,大部分Plustoken钱包中的以太坊(ETH)通过多个地址被转入了Bidesk交易所(该交易所于2021年底倒闭)。随后,这些ETH又从Bidesk交易所被转移至火币交易所。仅通过四个Bidesk存款地址转入的ETH数量就达到了268,843枚。

KIq9Q5Z8qCNmwXZr86pvlctT57Pdw2cbtGcAW12g.png

资金收缴国库

Plustoken涉及的加密货币总价值超过150亿元人民币。根据裁定书,执法部门共查获了194,775枚比特币、833,083枚以太坊、140万枚莱特币、2760万枚柚子币(EOS)、74,167枚达世币(DASH)、4.87亿枚瑞波币(XRP)、60亿枚狗狗币(DOGE)、79,581枚比特现金(BCH)和213,724枚泰达币(USDT)。最终,涉案组织者因传销诈骗被判刑,平台资金被依法没收。

四、小结

Plustoken相钱包的活动继续牵动投资者的敏感神经,并影响了近期ETH的走势。根据链上数据分析,这次钱包转移可能来自案件中已刑满释放人员操作。除了对市场行情的影响外,人们更为关注的是投资者在事件中遭受的巨大损失。自案件爆发以来,加密货币的价格已经上涨了数十倍。然而,在加密行业的早期阶段,许多投资者未能守住自己的财富。如果将当前的加密行业比作北美的淘金时代,它正释放出广阔的发展与财富增长空间。投资者需要确保资产安全,避免陷入庞氏骗局,从而享受时代发展的红利。

Пов'язані матеріали

RIP: Atlas, Which Lived Only 292 Days

On August 9, 2026, OpenAI discontinued its standalone AI browser, Atlas, just 292 days after its launch on October 21, 2025. Initially positioned as a challenger to Chrome and the broader AI browser ecosystem, Atlas aimed to fundamentally redesign how users interact with browsers by deeply integrating ChatGPT. Its features included an AI-powered address bar, a sidebar for webpage analysis, Browser Memories for context retention, and an Agent Mode to automate multi-step tasks like shopping and research. Despite building on Chromium with a custom OWL (OpenAI Web Layer) framework, OpenAI struggled with the immense complexity of maintaining a full-fledged browser. The team spent significant time addressing basic functionalities—password managers, extensions, input methods—that mainstream browsers already handled seamlessly. Atlas's core AI agent capabilities also faced issues with reliability, speed, and security vulnerabilities like prompt injection. Furthermore, Atlas was limited to Apple Silicon Macs, failing to release promised Windows, iOS, and Android versions. This, coupled with the high switching cost for users entrenched in Chrome or Edge's ecosystems, hindered its adoption. By mid-2026, updates slowed, and OpenAI announced its shutdown, opting to integrate Atlas's AI explorations into the ChatGPT desktop app and browser extensions instead. The article contrasts two AI browser development paths: standalone products like Atlas, Perplexity's Comet, and Dia, which redesign the browser around AI but face user migration barriers; and the approach of incumbents like Chrome and Edge, which add AI features atop existing, widely-used platforms. The key question remains whether users need a completely new "AI browser" or simply AI capabilities within their current browser. While Atlas's experiment ended, the broader trend of AI integration into browsing continues.

marsbit23 хв тому

RIP: Atlas, Which Lived Only 292 Days

marsbit23 хв тому

Bitcoin's "Anti-Spam" Update Failed, Lasting Less Than a Day

A Bitcoin update proposal aimed at curbing spam by temporarily banning non-financial data from being stored on the network, BIP-110, has failed decisively. After months of debate, developers attempted to launch a separate blockchain, which collapsed within a day. The failure stemmed from a critical lack of miner support, with less than 1% signaling approval for the update. The vast majority of miners chose to continue mining the main Bitcoin blockchain without providing explanations. Despite this, the initiative's developers proceeded to launch an alternative blockchain—a hard fork of Bitcoin—on August 8. This meant a small subset of miners stopped mining Bitcoin to support the new chain with BIP-110 changes. However, the new network inherited Bitcoin's mining difficulty. With only a tiny fraction of the total computational power, block times stretched to roughly 7 hours instead of the standard 10 minutes, rendering the network practically non-functional. Michael Saylor, founder of major corporate Bitcoin holder MicroStrategy and a vocal opponent of BIP-110, commented: "Bitcoin worked exactly as designed. The BIP-110 fork occurred, and network participants were free to choose which chain to follow. As a result, about 99.85% of the network's hash power remained with Bitcoin." The event had no significant impact on Bitcoin's price, which traded in a narrow range between approximately $64.5k and $65.5k from August 7 through August 10.

cryptonews.ru29 хв тому

Bitcoin's "Anti-Spam" Update Failed, Lasting Less Than a Day

cryptonews.ru29 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片