谁在组织Crypto4Harris虚拟市政厅?

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-07Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)对加密货币的立场相对未知,但一个名为Crypto4Harris的新组织背后的组织者正在推进一项倡议,将持有数字资产的支持者团结在民主党2024年总统候选人的周围。

加密货币倡导者的基层网络将于下周通过Zoom举办一场市政厅活动。与会者将有机会与支持哈里斯入主白宫的行业领袖、政策专家和加密货币爱好者交谈。

距离11月分裂的美国大选还有不到90天的时间,在乔·拜登总统上个月决定不竞选连任之后,加密货币粉丝的动员。与此同时,前总统唐纳德·特朗普在竞选活动中多次发表言论支持加密货币。

Crypto4Harris在推特(又名X)上的账户表示,亿万富翁Mark Cuban是计划参加的“重量级人物”之一。此前,这位投资者和著名的比特币粉丝告诉Decrypt,哈里斯阵营的多名人士向他提出了与加密货币相关的问题,他称之为“一个好兆头”

库班没有立即回应Decrypt的置评请求。

过去几年,拜登政府对比特币矿工征税、5月份否决支持加密货币的决议以及证券交易委员会主席加里·詹斯勒采取的执法行动,对加密货币采取了强硬立场。

特朗普抓住了一些加密货币倡导者所说的全面监管战争。例如,这位前总统在纳什维尔受到了雷鸣般的掌声,当时他告诉比特币用户,如果再次当选,他将“解雇Gary Gensler”,结束“反加密运动”

哈里斯的阵营是否会在加密货币领域翻开新的一页仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。尽管如此,哈里斯最近还是聘请了大卫·普洛夫担任高级顾问。Plouffe曾担任前总统巴拉克·奥巴马2008年成功入主白宫的竞选经理,此前他曾在加密货币交易所币安的全球顾问委员会任职。

“很多仇恨”

Crypto4Harris的主要组织者是在加密货币行业全职工作的志愿者。在接受Decrypt采访时,他们表示,他们希望向人们展示加密货币不是一党制的问题,哈里斯政府不会是拜登政府的延续。

加密数据分析平台Snickerdoodle Labs的首席执行官乔纳森·帕迪拉告诉哈里斯解密公司:“这是一个了解硅谷的人。他明白创新和创业对美国来说是超级关键的。”

经营自己咨询公司的William Schweitzer表示,他是一名民主党战略家,有兴趣向哈里斯竞选团队发出基于加密货币的支持信息。Schweitzer指出,一个公开支持该技术的“左倾人士”联盟表示,Crypto4Harris正在创建一个平台来展示这一信息。

他说:“如果你纵观加密推特领域,你会发现很多人对现任政府的仇恨。”。“这是为了迈出新的一步。”

组织者表示,他们欢迎加密货币领域的任何人加入所谓的“有机联盟”,他们只是从领导的角度代表了其当前的体现。

“政治足球”

众议员Wiley Nickel(北卡罗来纳州民主党)在推特上表示,他期待着在市政厅发表演讲,截至本文撰写时,市政厅已有300名注册人。上周,Nickel告诉Decrypt,有迹象表明哈里斯将作为总司令对加密货币采取“平衡的方法”。

尼克尔周三在推特上写道:“作为民主党人和(卡玛拉·哈里斯)的支持者,我们希望鼓励创新,保护消费者。”。“允许加密货币成为政治足球只会让美国更加落后。”

Nickel没有立即回应Decrypt的置评请求。

投资公司Paradigm的政策主管Justin Slaughter鼓励人们参加市政厅会议,即使他们不支持哈里斯。他在推特上表示,这次活动可能会让人们了解“哈里斯竞选团队对加密货币和技术的持续重置意味着什么”

该活动的宣布在网上遭到了明显的抵制。一位推特用户将其比作龙虾组织沸水活动,而其他人则指出缺乏具体的政策声明,或者Crypto4Harris帐户的数字足迹相对较小。

VanEck的数字资产主管Matthew Sigel在推特上问道:“你很高兴看到一个拥有900名粉丝的账户做出了努力,但没有具体细节吗?”。“这太可悲了。”

Sigel的问题是在回应加密货币创新委员会首席执行官Sheila Warren的推特帖子时提出的,该委员会是一个参与加密货币政策的行业联盟。沃伦曾表示,“加密货币是最终的大帐篷”,Crypto4Harris的外展是本着加密货币包容性的精神,“无论社区的一些人告诉你什么”

沃伦在随后的一篇帖子中写道:“数据显示,加密钱包持有者涵盖了所有人口统计和地理区域。”。“我们的目标应该是与任何愿意开放并寻求教育的人接触,无论其政治派别如何。”

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手2 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手2 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit5 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit5 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手6 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手6 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit7 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片