Polymarket 10亿美元的胜利——“特朗普vs哈里斯”是唯一的责任吗?

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-02Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-02

币界网报道:
    Polymarket的累计交易量超过10亿美元,每周活跃用户也增长了14倍以上

对于加密货币领域及其社区来说,这是忙碌而富有成效的一年。不仅比特币和以太坊现货ETF获得批准,两党政治领导人也在排队支持加密货币。不用说,一些项目从中受益匪浅。流行的去中心化预测平台Polymarket就是其中之一。

Polymarket的用户使用加密货币买卖股票,以押注现实世界的事件。在过去的6个月里,随着美国选举周期的加速,越来越多的人开始使用Polymarket进行此类押注。

事实上,就在最近,它在图表上的累计交易量超过了10亿美元,仅7月份就记录了超过3.87亿美元的数字。

但这还不是全部。月活跃交易者从6月的2940万增至7月的4450万,未平仓合约也飙升至9000万美元。每周活跃用户从约1400人增长到20000多人,增长了约14倍。

现在,大多数分析人士认为,美国正在进行的选举周期与这种兴趣激增有关。而且,值得称赞的是,我们也有充分的理由相信这一点,尤其是在人们押注“谁将成为下一任美国总统”的情况下占Polymarket总交易量的45%以上。

然而,根据Polymarket最大的单一投资者ParaFi Capital的说法,这并不能告诉我们全部情况。在X上的一条病毒式传播的帖子中,这家资产管理公司声称,

“在使用Polymarket的近7万个地址中,只有42%是在与选举相关的市场进行首次交易的。另外58%,即约4万名用户,最初是在非选举市场进行交易的,包括文化、商业、科学和宏观市场。”

也,

“在28000多名在选举相关市场首次下注的用户中,56%的用户随后在不同的市场进行了交易。”

过去几个月,与选举相关的市场交易量飙升,与其他现实世界事件相关的交易量也飙升。美国证券交易委员会对现货以太坊ETF的批准时间表就是一个很好的例子,这一事件刺激了累计交易量增加了1300万美元。

在这里,其他市场包括对奥运会奖牌数的投注、泰勒·斯威夫特的参与统计数据,以及对GPT-5可能推出日期的投注。

简单地说,虽然Polymarket的实用性和受欢迎程度在这个选举周期中飙升,但仅凭这些政治事件并没有决定该平台在过去几个月的交易量。

在这里,值得一提的是,在该平台最近取得成功的基础上,该平台的高管们正在考虑不同的策略,特别是那些以盈利为目标的策略。向平台增加费用是目前正在探索的一个想法。

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Invited Analysis

The market is experiencing directional uncertainty with both opportunities and risks. HYPE's daily V-wave structure is at a critical juncture, with the $40.17 support level being pivotal for its future trajectory. A break below this level, followed by an inability to surpass the recent high of $45.76, could signal the end of the current upward structure. The short-term strategy for HYPE is to "follow the trend and buy on dips," using a 30% position size and a 30/60-minute trading cycle, entering long upon confirmed support holds with model signals. Bitcoin's market structure is reinterpreted, with the rally from the $60,000 low now considered a larger D-wave rebound within a medium-term correction, facing a key test between $73,500 and $79,000. A break above the upper bound may lead to limited upside, while a drop below could see a decline toward $69,500. Core resistance lies at $79,000–$80,600 and $83,500–$84,500, with support at $73,500, $69,500, and $65,000–$66,000. The medium-term strategy maintains a 60% short position from $89,000, to be exited if price stabilizes above the multi-empty band. Short-term tactics involve 30% positions for "spread" opportunities, with two scenarios: selling on rallies near $76,500–$79,000 (Scheme A) or shorting on a breakdown below $73,500 (Scheme B), both with strict stop-losses. A复盘 of HYPE's recent short trade showed a 6.80% gain from a long entry at $41.59 (based on model buy signals) and exit at $44.42 (triggered by top signals). Key reminders include setting initial stops at entry, moving to breakeven at +1% profit, and trailing stops thereafter. All views are for reference only; market conditions change rapidly, and caution is advised.

Odaily星球日报6 хв тому

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Invited Analysis

Odaily星球日报6 хв тому

On the Same Day Aave Introduced rsETH, Why Did Spark Choose to Exit?

On April 18, Kelp DAO's cross-chain bridge was exploited, resulting in the malicious minting of 116,500 unbacked rsETH. The attacker deposited these into Aave and borrowed WETH, creating a potential bad debt of approximately $195 million. Aave’s Guardian quickly froze the market, but the protocol’s insurance could only cover about 25% of the loss. In contrast, SparkLend, a lending protocol in the MakerDAO ecosystem, suffered no direct losses. This was not due to superior foresight but rather a preemptive governance decision. On January 29, Spark executed a governance action to discontinue new rsETH supply, citing low usage and high concentration from a single wallet. The same day, Aave expanded its rsETH market by enabling E-Mode with a 93% LTV to attract more deposits. Spark’s risk management framework is designed to remove assets with low usage or poor risk-adjusted returns, regardless of external security concerns. Aave’s decision was growth-oriented, aiming to boost WETH utilization and attract capital. Spark also employs additional safeguards: rate-limited supply and borrow caps that would have limited the scale of such an attack, and a robust oracle system using the median of three price feeds. These mechanisms systemically contain the maximum exposure to any single risk event, demonstrating a fundamentally different approach to risk than Aave’s growth-first model.

marsbit7 хв тому

On the Same Day Aave Introduced rsETH, Why Did Spark Choose to Exit?

marsbit7 хв тому

Strategy's 'Money Printer': Is STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

Bitcoin's recent price movement is being heavily influenced by Michael Saylor and his company, MicroStrategy, through a new financial instrument: STRC (Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock). This Nasdaq-listed perpetual preferred stock offers an 11.5% annual dividend, attracting significant capital. Crucially, funds raised from STRC are used to purchase Bitcoin, with a 3x leverage effect—for every $1 from STRC, MicroStrategy adds $2 from MSTR equity to buy $3 worth of BTC. This creates a powerful "flywheel": more STRC sales fuel massive BTC buying, supporting its price and improving MicroStrategy's credit, which in turn makes STRC more attractive to investors. However, this mechanism introduces risks. A significant "ex-dividend arbitrage" pattern has emerged, where traders buy STRC before its monthly dividend, collect the payout, and quickly sell, causing price volatility and potentially driving up Bitcoin's cost basis for MicroStrategy. In response, Saylor has proposed shifting STRC to a semi-monthly dividend to smooth out these effects. Furthermore, STRC's high yield is being integrated into DeFi protocols like Apyx Protocol and Saturn Credit, offering new on-chain yield opportunities. The central concern remains: as MicroStrategy aggressively accumulates over 3.5% of all BTC, it challenges Bitcoin's foundational principle of decentralization, creating a system where a single public company significantly influences the market.

marsbit14 хв тому

Strategy's 'Money Printer': Is STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

marsbit14 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片