Pantera 研究:加密行业存在工资差距,女性收入高于男性 15%

比推Опубліковано о 2024-08-01Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-01

娱乐行业的制作人和导演是女性收入高于男性的唯一其他领域。

撰文:Matt Stephenson、Ally Zach、Nick Zurick

编译:深潮 TechFlow

我们报告了 Pantera Capital 关于区块链行业薪酬的横断面调查结果。该调查共有 502 名普通人群的受访者,是迄今为止同类调查中规模最大的。我们的分析发现,加密行业员工的性别工资差距与一般情况相反——在我们的样本中,女性的收入超过男性。

性别工资差距

方法论

本研究采用两阶段研究设计,以应对多重假设检验和 p-hacking 的潜在问题。前一年调查的初步观察被视为试点研究,为当前研究提供了信息。

试点研究(前一年)

在前一次调查的探索性数据分析中观察到了性别工资差距,但由于多重比较引发的假阳性风险,并未将其报告为发现。这种方法符合避免第一类错误和出版偏见的最佳实践。基于试点数据,我们进行了先验功效分析,以确定今年调查中检测假设效应所需的样本量。这些结果在此呈现。

确认性分析:

当前研究作为确认性测试。这种方法允许更可靠的 p 值解释,因为它不受多重比较或事后假设的影响。

通过采用这种两阶段方法,我们避免了多重比较校正的需要,例如 Bonferroni 方法,这在同时测试多个假设的单个研究中是合适的。相反,我们的方法与预测建模中的「样本外验证」概念相一致,增强了我们发现的稳健性。

这一方法论框架增强了我们结果的有效性,并为加密货币行业研究等探索性领域提供了严格假设检验的模型。

调查方法和结果

数据收集时间为 2024 年 6 月 4 日至 7 月 20 日,通过基于网络的调查问卷进行,问卷通过专业网络(LinkedIn)、社交媒体平台(X)、新闻通讯和电子邮件传播。样本由 502 名自我认定为男性或女性的美国受访者组成。仅全职员工被纳入分析。

对中位数基本工资的分析显示,加密货币公司的女性收入比男性高出 14.67%。女性的中位数基本工资为 172,000 美元,而男性为 150,000 美元,女性的收入相当于男性每赚一美元就赚 1.15 美元。

这一差异在统计上显著(Mann-Whitney U 检验,p < 0.05),与一般劳动市场趋势相反,后者女性通常收入低于男性。通过回归分析,我们还观察到平均差异有利于女性(p < 0.05)。

这一结果挑战了性别工资差距的叙述,在非加密公司中,女性通常每赚一美元男性只赚 $0.84 美元。

进一步分析

更仔细地检查职业群体,娱乐行业的制作人和导演是女性收入高于男性的唯一其他领域。虽然其他高学位职业的薪酬接近平等,但现实是,即使在 Web2 技术行业,男性的收入仍然显著高于女性。

这种反向工资差距可能部分归因于性别之间经验水平的差异。加密行业的女性往往经验更丰富,通常处于中级到高级职位,当前职位的工作经验超过五年。相比之下,更多男性占据入门级职位,因为他们正在向加密行业过渡。

这种「反向」工资差距可能表明,与传统领域相比,加密行业为女性提供了更好的机会。

需要认识到,女性在这一行业中仍然可能面临障碍和困难。然而,加密行业相对公平的薪酬表明,性别平等正在朝着更大的方向发展,标志着这一新兴领域的进步趋势。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit44 хв тому

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit44 хв тому

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit52 хв тому

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit52 хв тому

$500 to Buy OpenAI Stock: Silicon Valley's Most Respectable Liquidity Invitation

Silicon Valley's largest venture capital platform, AngelList, has launched a new fund called USVC, allowing U.S. retail investors to buy into high-profile AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI with a minimum investment of $500—no accredited investor status required. Promoted by AngelList co-founder Naval Ravikant, the fund is framed as an opportunity for ordinary people to access high-growth private tech investments traditionally reserved for VCs. However, critics argue it functions more like an exit vehicle for early insiders. USVC acquires shares not through primary rounds but largely via secondary transactions—purchasing stakes from early investors, VC funds, and employees looking to cash out at peak valuations. With companies like xAI heavily weighted in the portfolio, the fund effectively channels retail money into providing liquidity for insiders who entered at much lower valuations. The fund’s structure raises concerns: shares are illiquid, with no secondary market, and buybacks are limited and discretionary. The actual annual fee reaches 3.61%, far above the advertised 1% management fee. This model parallels the "low float, high fully diluted valuation" strategy seen in crypto, where early investors profit by selling to latecomers at inflated prices. The timing—alongside similar moves by platforms like Robinhood—suggests that Silicon Valley’s sudden interest in retail inclusion may be less about democratizing access and more about securing exits for insiders.

marsbit1 год тому

$500 to Buy OpenAI Stock: Silicon Valley's Most Respectable Liquidity Invitation

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片