Pantera 研究:加密行业存在工资差距,女性收入高于男性 15%

比推Опубліковано о 2024-08-01Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-01

娱乐行业的制作人和导演是女性收入高于男性的唯一其他领域。

撰文:Matt Stephenson、Ally Zach、Nick Zurick

编译:深潮 TechFlow

我们报告了 Pantera Capital 关于区块链行业薪酬的横断面调查结果。该调查共有 502 名普通人群的受访者,是迄今为止同类调查中规模最大的。我们的分析发现,加密行业员工的性别工资差距与一般情况相反——在我们的样本中,女性的收入超过男性。

性别工资差距

方法论

本研究采用两阶段研究设计,以应对多重假设检验和 p-hacking 的潜在问题。前一年调查的初步观察被视为试点研究,为当前研究提供了信息。

试点研究(前一年)

在前一次调查的探索性数据分析中观察到了性别工资差距,但由于多重比较引发的假阳性风险,并未将其报告为发现。这种方法符合避免第一类错误和出版偏见的最佳实践。基于试点数据,我们进行了先验功效分析,以确定今年调查中检测假设效应所需的样本量。这些结果在此呈现。

确认性分析:

当前研究作为确认性测试。这种方法允许更可靠的 p 值解释,因为它不受多重比较或事后假设的影响。

通过采用这种两阶段方法,我们避免了多重比较校正的需要,例如 Bonferroni 方法,这在同时测试多个假设的单个研究中是合适的。相反,我们的方法与预测建模中的「样本外验证」概念相一致,增强了我们发现的稳健性。

这一方法论框架增强了我们结果的有效性,并为加密货币行业研究等探索性领域提供了严格假设检验的模型。

调查方法和结果

数据收集时间为 2024 年 6 月 4 日至 7 月 20 日,通过基于网络的调查问卷进行,问卷通过专业网络(LinkedIn)、社交媒体平台(X)、新闻通讯和电子邮件传播。样本由 502 名自我认定为男性或女性的美国受访者组成。仅全职员工被纳入分析。

对中位数基本工资的分析显示,加密货币公司的女性收入比男性高出 14.67%。女性的中位数基本工资为 172,000 美元,而男性为 150,000 美元,女性的收入相当于男性每赚一美元就赚 1.15 美元。

这一差异在统计上显著(Mann-Whitney U 检验,p < 0.05),与一般劳动市场趋势相反,后者女性通常收入低于男性。通过回归分析,我们还观察到平均差异有利于女性(p < 0.05)。

这一结果挑战了性别工资差距的叙述,在非加密公司中,女性通常每赚一美元男性只赚 $0.84 美元。

进一步分析

更仔细地检查职业群体,娱乐行业的制作人和导演是女性收入高于男性的唯一其他领域。虽然其他高学位职业的薪酬接近平等,但现实是,即使在 Web2 技术行业,男性的收入仍然显著高于女性。

这种反向工资差距可能部分归因于性别之间经验水平的差异。加密行业的女性往往经验更丰富,通常处于中级到高级职位,当前职位的工作经验超过五年。相比之下,更多男性占据入门级职位,因为他们正在向加密行业过渡。

这种「反向」工资差距可能表明,与传统领域相比,加密行业为女性提供了更好的机会。

需要认识到,女性在这一行业中仍然可能面临障碍和困难。然而,加密行业相对公平的薪酬表明,性别平等正在朝着更大的方向发展,标志着这一新兴领域的进步趋势。

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

Trezor Customer Data Leak: Coins Are Safe, But Phishing Is Inevitable

Trezor, a hardware cryptocurrency wallet manufacturer, reported a data breach at its logistics partner, ShipMonk, affecting around 13,689 customers. The incident, confirmed on August 13, 2026, involved unauthorized access to ShipMonk's systems, which stored order information from May 10 to August 8, 2026. Trezor's own systems and user crypto assets were not compromised. The leaked data varies: for 11,742 customers, full names, email addresses, phone numbers, and delivery addresses were exposed. For 1,947 others, only name, city, and email were leaked. The breach was limited to customers in the US, UK, Sweden, Colombia, Brazil, Italy, and Portugal. Trezor warns affected users of an increased risk of phishing attacks, where malicious actors may use the stolen contact details to impersonate Trezor, banks, or exchanges to steal wallet recovery phrases. All impacted customers have been notified via email. In response, Trezor announced a planned "Anonymous Delivery" feature for the EU (September 2026) and the US (end of 2026), aiming to anonymize logistics data. ShipMonk has not yet issued a public statement on its official website. The analysis highlights this as a recurring industry pattern where third-party logistics vendors become weak links in the supply chain, storing data longer than necessary. Similar incidents, like the 2020 Ledger breach, led to prolonged phishing campaigns. A key question remains whether hardware wallets can ever fully decouple from external logistics risks.

cryptonews.ru13 хв тому

Trezor Customer Data Leak: Coins Are Safe, But Phishing Is Inevitable

cryptonews.ru13 хв тому

Token Buyback Volumes Continue to Rise, But Price Lows Keep Falling

The volume of token buybacks continues to grow, but the minimum price level is constantly declining, according to an internal memo by Bitwise CIO Matt Hogan. He argues that most crypto tokens, except Bitcoin, are undervalued as investors are unaware of the revenue now being returned to holders. He highlights the example of Hyperliquid, which has bought back and burned $1.3 billion worth of its $HYPE token. Hogan posits that tokens are beginning to trade based on revenue, similar to stocks and bonds, marking the end of an era where scaling networks provided little token utility. He links token valuation to strengthening protocol revenue, noting that Hyperliquid has earned over $800 million in the past year and spends nearly all fees on $HYPE buybacks. Following this model, protocols like Uniswap and Aave have implemented fee mechanisms to buy back and burn their own tokens. The trend has also affected base chains like Solana and Aptos, which have proposed or enacted higher fee burns. However, the memo acknowledges that reducing token supply has not reliably boosted prices. A Cryptopolitan report found many tokens with regular buybacks still underperformed the market. Even Hyperliquid's upward trend broke, and Pump.fun conducted significant buybacks near token lows. Hogan cautions that token buybacks differ from stock buybacks due to the lack of contractual claims on profits or assets, as governance rules can always be rewritten.

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Token Buyback Volumes Continue to Rise, But Price Lows Keep Falling

cryptonews.ru1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片