真人玩家在 Bot 遍地的链游中还能保持竞争力吗?

深潮Опубліковано о 2024-07-26Востаннє оновлено о 2024-07-26

链上游戏必须接受机器人作为用户群的一部分。

撰文:WMP, Bankless

编译:Felix, PANews

链上游戏吸引了一类极其高效的玩家:机器人。当机器人参与其中,真人玩家还能保持竞争力吗?

完全链上游戏将一切(包括资产、逻辑、规则和状态)直接放在底层区块链上。在这个新的游戏领域,每个举动最终都被记录在链上。

这种功能提供了各种好处,例如透明度和围绕新颖游戏经济的可能性。然而,这也吸引了一类极其高效的玩家类型:机器人。

真人在链上游戏有竞争力吗?

最近,风投公司 Nascent 联合创始人 Dan Elitzer 在 X 上问道,「是否有可能制作出一款完全链上的游戏,让没有辅助的真人也能在其中竞争?」

Elitzer 在 plotchy 的推文中提出了这个问题。plotchy 是 Nascent Security 的安全研究员,plotchy 已在游戏 Kamigotchi 的排行榜上占据了主导地位(Kamigotchi 是一款全新的完全链上 RPG 类游戏)。

尽管 Kamigotchi 早期的测试网智能合约未经验证且是闭源的,但 plotchy 还是设法对游戏架构进行了逆向工程,并创建了一个索引器来解析其数据。

通过访问详细的游戏信息,包括 Kami 宠物的位置和健康状况,plotchy 随后编写了一个机器人来追捕其他 Kami,并开始迅速登上游戏排行榜。

鉴于这种操作,plotchy 一直在与 Kamigotchi 团队进行讨论,后者一直在不断进行迭代。玩家也在调整游戏风格以更好的生存。团队为此引入了一项新任务,引导玩家协作对抗 plotchy 的宠物军队。

尽管如此,链上游戏中的机器人仍然存在。

Kamigotchi 的开发者之一 lethe 在推文中指出,链上游戏必须接受机器人作为用户群的一部分,因为游戏具有开放性,而团队的挑战在于对游戏设计进行调整,以平衡这种状况。

也就是说,团队的最终目标是创建一个游戏环境,让真人玩家和机器人玩家能够共存,既有趣又不会让真人玩家感到难以忍受。那么,在实现这种平衡方面,链上游戏的未来会是什么样子呢?

至于如何减少那些部署了许多机器人并通过自动账户群操纵游戏的用户,反女巫措施可能会越来越多地被采用。

可以肯定的是,女巫攻击仍然是加密领域的一个悬而未决的问题,没有完美的解决方案。然而,一些个人身份证明技术的组合,如通过社交媒体注册、社区报告计划和 AI 分析,可能会在抑制链上游戏中的机器人群方面卓有成效。

另一方面,对抗机器人的另一种策略是正面对抗。正如作者以前的同事 FaultProofBen 最近所说,「在链上游戏中对抗机器人的最佳方法是加入公会。」

FaultProofBen 也知道这一点,他是 WASD 的创始人,这是加密领域最大的链上游戏公会。当你拥有一大群紧密合作的真人玩家时,你就拥有了一支可以与机器人玩家抗衡甚至更好的战斗力量。

当然,如果无法打败他们,那就加入他们吧。FaultProofBen 还预测,「机器人的使用将变得民主化,非技术玩家也可以使用。」想想游戏插件或服务之类的东西,它们让所有玩家都可以轻松优化游戏玩法。至少,这种方法有助于创造公平的竞争环境。

链上游戏仍处于发展初期,因此该领域现在正在努力应对机器人也就不足为奇了。当作者在玩《Fall Guys》或《Overwatch》等主流游戏时会遇到机器人,这些游戏在更封闭的轨道上运行,机器人只是游戏中的一个范例(无足轻重)。

然而,作者不认为因 Bot 的存在,而永远将链上游戏定位为小众游戏。随着这个领域的成熟,进步和创新将有助于削弱机器人玩家的主导地位,以便真人玩家仍然能够蓬勃发展。未来还有很多挑战,个人对未来持乐观态度。

Пов'язані матеріали

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

The AI infrastructure (AI Infra) industry chain is facing unprecedented systemic bottlenecks, despite the rapid emergence of applications like DeepSeek and Seedance 2.0. The surge in global computing demand has exposed critical constraints across multiple layers of the supply chain—from core manufacturing equipment and data center cabling to specialty materials and cleanroom facilities. Key challenges include four major "walls": - **Memory Wall**: High-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM face structural shortages as AI inference demand outpaces training, with new capacity not expected until 2027. - **Bandwidth Wall**: Data transfer speeds lag behind computing power, causing multi-level bottlenecks in-chip, between chips, and across data centers. - **Compute Wall**: Advanced chip manufacturing, reliant on EUV lithography and monopolized by ASML, remains the fundamental constraint, with supply chain fragility affecting production. - **Power Wall**: While energy demand from data centers is rising, power supply is a solvable near-term challenge through diversified energy infrastructure. Expansion is further hindered by shortages in testing equipment, IC substrates (critical for GPUs and seeing price hikes over 30%), specialty materials like low-CTE glass fiber, and high-end cleanroom facilities. Connection technologies are evolving, with copper cables resurging for short-range links due to cost and latency advantages, while optical solutions dominate long-range scenarios. Innovations like hollow-core fiber and advanced PCB technologies (e.g., glass substrates, mSAP) are emerging to meet bandwidth needs. In summary, AI Infra bottlenecks are multidimensional, spanning compute, memory, bandwidth, power, and supply chain logistics. Advanced chip manufacturing remains the core constraint, while substrate, material, and equipment shortages present immediate challenges. The industry is moving toward hybrid copper-optical solutions and accelerated domestic supply chain development.

marsbit42 хв тому

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

marsbit42 хв тому

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbit1 год тому

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片