Bitwise 首席投资官:现在是加密货币长期投资者的绝佳时机

coinvoiceОпубліковано о 2024-07-11Востаннє оновлено о 2024-07-16

原标题:《Short-Term Pain, Long-Term Gain》

作者:Matt Hougan,Bitwise 首席投资官

编译:Luffy,Foresight News

 

当前的市场回调对于长期投资者来说似乎是一份礼物;关键的顺风因素可能会推动比特币在年底前达到 10 万美元。

加密货币市场正处于一种奇怪的状态:所有的短期消息都是坏消息,而所有的长期消息都是好消息。这种矛盾为长期投资者创造了一个千载难逢的机会。让我解释一下。

 

加密货币背后的巨大推动力

 

对加密货币长期投资者而言,现在就是最好的时刻。

现货比特币 ETP 的资金流入量惊人:自 1 月份推出以来,现货比特币 ETP 已吸引 150 亿美元的净新资产,成为有史以来最成功的 ETP。而我认为它们才刚刚起步。摩根士丹利和富国银行等最大的财富管理平台甚至尚未进入这个领域。我猜是在今年晚些时候这两个巨头会正式进入,可能会带来数十亿美元的资金流入。

比特币减半:今年 4 月,比特币经历了四年一度的减半,新增供应量减少了 50%。从历史上看,比特币在每次减半后的一年里表现都非常出色。这次会有所不同吗?

现货以太坊 ETP:美国证券交易委员会已批准现货以太坊 ETP 关键文件,以太坊 ETP 上线已经近在眼前。我们认为这些 ETP 在上市后的前 18 个月内可以吸引 150 亿美元的净资金流入。

美国政府对加密货币的态度的巨大转变:近年来,华盛顿一直敌视加密货币,阻碍了加密行业发展。但在过去几个月,华盛顿的态度发生了急剧性转变。5 月,71 名民主党人与 208 名共和党人一起支持一项加密货币新监管框架。两党支持的原因之一是什么?得益于华盛顿最强大的超级政治行动委员会网络之一,加密货币行业已经具备了政治影响力。更重要的是,特朗普和共和党历史性地公开支持加密货币,这表明其在美国大选中的重要性日益增加。

美联储降息:联邦基金期货市场预计到 2024 年底将降息两次,未来 12 个月将降息四到五次。利率下降将使更多资金流入加密货币。

再加上稳定币的强劲增长、Layer 2 的重大进展、贝莱德等机构的深入等等,这一切描绘了一个多么美好的未来。下半年,这些因素的组合效应很可能将比特币提高到 10 万美元,同时以太坊也将达到历史新高。

 

短期阻力

 

那么,既然有这么多好消息,为什么比特币价格还会下降呢?答案是:一次性倾销。

具体来说,加密货币市场最近受到了多起短期流动性冲击的影响。在过去两周中,我们看到:

Mt. Gox 还款:2014 年倒闭的加密货币交易所 Mt. Gox,终于在 7 月初开始向债权人支付款项。这是一件大事:Mt. Gox 预计将在未来几个月向债权人偿还超过 80 亿美元的比特币。数十亿美元的比特币可能会被立即出售。

美国政府抛售:美国政府持有价值超过 120 亿美元的比特币,这些比特币是 2013 年从臭名昭著的在线黑市丝绸之路缴获的。7 月 1 日,美国法警局宣布将在 Coinbase Prime 出售这些资产,这表明这些资产可能很快就会进入市场。

德国政府抛售:多次没收比特币的德国政府也不甘示弱,目前已抛售 9 亿美元比特币。剩余的比特币可能很快就会出售。

想想看,Mt. Gox 的 80 亿美元、丝绸之路的 120 亿美元、德国的 20 亿美元……这是相当庞大的一笔比特币。更糟糕的是,这些销售和分配都是在 7 月 4 日假期周开始的,恰恰是加密货币流动性较低的时期。这导致期货市场出现大量清算,进一步给价格带来压力。

 

一切都会过去

 

但请记住:这些都是一次性倾销,它们终将结束。

作为投资者,我们在评估投资时要忽略偶然事件,它们并不代表投资的长期价值。

换句话说,这一切都会过去。Mt.Gox 还款(的影响)迟早会过去,美国政府出售丝绸之路资产也会结束。

与此同时,积极的一面不会消失。比特币 ETP 不会消失,以太坊会继续吸引新的资金,华盛顿对加密货币的接受程度还在加速,等等。

这就是为什么说最近的回调是给长期投资者的一份礼物。

我认为一次性抛售事件正在抑制原本的牛市势头,一旦市场消化了这些短期流动性冲击,未来必会一片光明。


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

来源:Foresight News

Пов'язані матеріали

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit4 хв тому

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit4 хв тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit11 хв тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit11 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News13 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News13 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片