越来越近了!现货以太坊ETF有望最早于7月中旬获批

jin10Опубліковано о 2024-07-10Востаннє оновлено о 2024-07-10

资产管理公司乐观地认为,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)将在7月中旬批准首批现货以太坊ETF ,并表示其与监管机构的沟通仍然富有建设性。

尽管此前市场猜测批准将在7月4日假期期间获得,但据两位知情人士透露,SEC已告知现货以太坊ETF发行人,他们必须在7月8日之前提交更新的文件。在周五到期的这轮申请之后,可能还会有另一轮申请。

知情人士称,SEC上周五向发行人提供了最新反馈,内容包括发行人目前正在解决的一些小问题。5月份,该机构批准了交易所提出的上市这些产品的提议,但产品在上市之前还需要单独获得批准。

Galaxy Digital资产管理主管Steve Kurz预测,现货以太坊ETF将在未来几周内获得批准。他说,Galaxy已经向SEC提交以太坊现货ETF申请。

Kurz周二接受彭博电视采访时表示,“这些都是表面文章,SEC已经介入。我们已经这样做了几个月。我们在推出现货比特币ETF时就有相似的经历——我们知道流程。”

包括贝莱德公司、富达投资、21Shares和Invesco在内的公司都有待批准的申请。许多发行人尚未披露各自基金的收费,这是基金开始交易前的必要步骤。

假设这些基金获得批准,一个关键问题是,现货以太坊ETF是否会像今年1月现货比特币ETF历史性首次亮相时吸引巨大的需求。后者已积累了520亿美元的资产。

截至发稿,比特币下跌1%至61200美元/枚附近,以太坊同样跌逾1%至3400美元/枚下方。这一仅次于比特币的第二大加密货币今年迄今已上涨约50%。

K33 Research分析师认为,在现货以太坊ETF正式上市后,以太坊的表现将超越比特币。

分析师Vetle Lunde和David Zimmerman在7月2日的一份报告中表示,现货以太坊ETF是以太坊价格的坚实支撑,而比特币将面临抛售压力,因为从本周开始,价值85亿美元的比特币交易所Mt. Gox将向债权人还款。

一年多来,以太坊兑比特币的表现一直不佳,今年现货比特币ETF流入的资金超过140亿美元,推动了比特币的涨幅领先。

Lunde和Zimmerman预计,以太坊“在ETF推出后的即时反应是下跌”,但他们指出,就像此前比特币在现货ETF推出后的表现一样,资金流入ETF可能会提振以太坊的价格。

Lunde写道:“我坚定地认为,对于耐心的交易者来说,目前的以太坊兑比特币是一笔便宜的交易。我们继续看好以太坊的前景,预计在现货以太坊ETF推出后的五个月内,净流入相当于以太坊流通供应量的0.75-1%。”

以太坊兑比特币自去年以来一直在下跌,直到现货以太坊ETF意外获批后才出现逆转。

Lunde和Zimmerman表示,以太坊期货的未平仓合约“持续增加”,这表明许多交易员在现货ETF推出前都在使用大量杠杆来押注以太坊的潜在价格走势。

在现货ETF推出前,以太坊期货的未平仓合约大幅增加

Пов'язані матеріали

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit5 хв тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit5 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News6 хв тому

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News6 хв тому

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

**Summary: South Korea's Institutional Crypto Race: Stablecoins and RWA Take Off** South Korea is undergoing a structural shift in its crypto ecosystem, moving beyond its historical role as a major retail trading hub. Major financial institutions and internet platforms are now building institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, with stablecoins and Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization as the primary drivers. The push for a regulated Korean won stablecoin market is a major policy and corporate focus. This is driven partly by an estimated $115 billion outflow into dollar stablecoins like USDC, threatening the domestic financial system. Banks (e.g., KB Financial, Hana), payment giants (e.g., Shinhan Card, BC Card), and internet super-apps (KakaoPay, NAVER Pay) are all conducting pilots. The goal is to anchor future digital finance to the Korean won and local regulations. In RWA, South Korea is advancing rapidly within regulatory sandboxes, focusing on unique domestic assets beyond typical global templates like US Treasuries. Projects involve tokenizing ships (with Hyundai Heavy Industries), defense supply chain assets, and K-pop intellectual property, alongside more conventional assets. A legal framework is set for 2027, and platforms like NXT are preparing for regulated trading. Key opportunities for crypto-native projects lie in providing the underlying technology these traditional institutions lack: global distribution channels for tokenized assets, cross-chain liquidity solutions, and enabling infrastructure tools (e.g., for asset packaging and management). Partnerships, such as Solana with Shinhan Card or LayerZero with the Korea Gold Exchange, exemplify this proactive approach. Crucially, user access is being shaped by consumer platforms. NAVER's planned acquisition of Upbit's operator Dunamu and Kakao's development of a unified wallet aim to seamlessly integrate crypto with everyday payments for tens of millions of users. The race is now about which protocols and projects will become the foundational standards as regulation solidifies and institutional adoption accelerates.

Foresight News1 год тому

South Korean Institutions' Crypto Race: Dual Explosion of Stablecoins and RWA

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片