Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-06-03Востаннє оновлено о 2024-06-03

Анотація

新瓶装旧酒,名人效应老套路。

原文作者:深潮 TechFlow

大玩家又回来了。

在沉寂了半个月后,做多游戏驿站股票一战成名的 Roaring Kitty今天在推特上发布一张 UNO 卡牌游戏中的「翻转牌」。

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

不管这条推文到底有何暗示 or 明示,由于 Roaring Kitty 个人形象已经和 Wall Street Bets Themed 这一概念深度绑定,此条推文一出,游戏驿站股票$GME 的 Solana 链同名代币$GME 短时上涨接近 300% ,而在 ETH 链的$GME 更是飙升近 800% 。

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

新瓶装旧酒,名人效应老套路?

在上个月 Roaring Kitty 时隔三年首次发推,随之引发$GME 和同名代币大爆涨,在此期间 Roaring Kitty 不断地在推特发布各种不同的影视片段。

即使是此般看上去不知所云的表达却同样引起人们的 fomo,Roaring Kitty 在推特发出的每一条短片几乎都有同名的 memecoin 跟风炒作。

对于 Roaring Kitty 本人来说或许只是一时兴起地表达,但对于韭菜们来说却不能不在意,毕竟每条推文都可能是未经发掘的金矿。

与名人自身概念强关联的标的拉盘,这种事看着离谱,但对币圈玩家来说,早已见证了市场一波又一波的爱屋及乌。

马斯克通过推文多次表达对$DOGE 的喜爱之后,$DOGE 的价格貌似就与他的一言一行强绑定了。

在 21 年马斯克每一次提到 Dogecoin,随之而来的就是$DOGE 巨大的泵,屡次不爽。此般造富效应的影响力像雪球一样越滚越大,甚至到后来对于马斯克推文的监控已经到了卷毫秒级。

时至今日,马斯克依然是币圈的顶流,市场上仍有无数双眼睛紧盯他的每一条推特,期待能从某条推文中出现财富密码。

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

之前炒作的“创始人与小动物”概念也是如此,V神的猫、Solana 创始人 Toly 的龙、Ploygon 创始人 Sandeep 的宠物象等等......

致使人们的趋之若鹜的必然不是可爱的小动物本身,宠物板块炒作的本质还是名人影响力的下沉。

名人自身的影响力吸引人们对标的 meme 炒作的目光,再加之部分名人自身也主动为 meme“带货”,就像油罐上的火星,遇之即燃。

当然作为影响力本身的名人们自是深谙其道,上周爆火的$Jenner 币原型Caitlyn Jenner蹭热点的速度也是相当快:

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

哪些 GME 概念 Meme 值得关注?

同名股票代币

$GME

两个游戏驿站股票的同名代币$GME 是当前最火标的:

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

$AMC

和$GME 的叙事类似,$AMC 也是美股$AMC 的同名代币,作为北美最大影院的$AMC 也是北美散户热衷炒作的标的,从价格表现看$AMC 也明显受到 Roaring Kitty 的推文影响,拉升接近 700% 后回落。

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

人物同名代币

$Kitty是 Roaring Kitty 的同名代币,在 5 月 Roaring Kitty 时隔三年首次发推后旋即暴涨,今天也随着 Roaring Kitty 的新动态拉升将近 1000% 后回落。

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

Wall Street Bets 概念

$WSB 与$WSM

还有直指华尔街赌注主题的$WSB 与$WSM

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

Roaring Kitty再复出?哪些GME概念Meme值得关注

可见现在市场的需求越来越简单粗暴了,注意力经济的财富效应一次又一次地碾压纯基本面党,大家都需要自己的投入掷地有声,一则消息就能直接拉盘那是再好不过,所以现在 Roaring Kitty 的一张图片就能轻松推动上亿美元的资金流动。

马斯克的狗,V神的猫,Kitty 的 GME,其实一切都没变过......

注意力就像名人手中的令旗,只需伸手轻轻一挥,散户们说是召之即来也不为过。

只是注意力也有保质期,市场更愿意为不断涌现的新热点买单,即便这个新热点只是换了张皮的老故事。

Roaring Kitty 这次“复出”是否只是他的一时兴起还仍未可知,但可以确定的是加密市场永远不缺新鲜的热点和甘愿为热点买单的拥趸。

原文链接

Пов'язані матеріали

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

Blockstream, a major Bitcoin solutions developer, has introduced a draft proposal for a new quantum-resistant digital signature scheme called SHRINCS. The scheme aims to protect Bitcoin transactions from potential attacks by quantum computers while aiming to maintain network throughput. This marks the second technical proposal for Bitcoin quantum defense in recent days, following a similar initiative from StarkWare. A quantum attack on blockchain typically involves deriving a private key from a public one. Currently considered computationally infeasible, quantum algorithms could potentially solve this problem far more efficiently. This threat presents two primary scenarios: an attacker could target addresses where the public key is already exposed, or intercept a transaction before it is confirmed, extract the public key, derive the private key, and replace the transaction. Blockstream's SHRINCS is designed to counter the latter, "in-flight" attack scenario. The SHRINCS signature is built upon the SHA-256 hash function, the same one already used in Bitcoin mining, allowing developers to leverage well-tested, familiar mechanisms. A key design goal was to preserve network capacity. Blockstream estimates Bitcoin could process about three transactions per second using SHRINCS, compared to the current rate of roughly seven, noting that some alternative quantum-resistant schemes could reduce throughput to as low as 0.36 transactions per second. Currently, the security proof for SHRINCS is pending, and the software has not been audited or deemed ready for production. However, Blockstream conducted tests with such transactions on its Liquid sidechain in March. Over the past year, Bitcoin developers have been actively exploring paths to migrate to post-quantum cryptography, a priority across the broader crypto market, underscored by significant investments into securing the leading cryptocurrency.

cryptonews.ru36 хв тому

A Major Bitcoin Developer Presents a Quantum Defense Scheme. What's the Essence

cryptonews.ru36 хв тому

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

When autonomous AI agents behave unpredictably and cause harm, determining legal liability is complex. Currently, there is no specific federal AI agent liability law, so existing legal frameworks are applied. The AI agent itself cannot be held liable, as it is not a legal entity. Liability typically falls on the "developer" (the maker of the AI) or the "deployer" (the user), depending on the facts and circumstances. A negligence analysis under standard tort law may apply. For instance, if a deployer gives a reckless instruction, such as demanding quick money without safety parameters, they could face significant liability, including potential criminal charges under statutes like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. The situation is complicated by open-source models, where licenses often disclaim liability, and by the unclear division of responsibility between developers and deployers. An analogy is drawn to self-driving car accidents, where both the manufacturer and the human operator can share fault. In cases of severe harm, such as using AI to create bioweapons, liability for developers depends on jurisdiction; the EU's AI Act imposes responsibilities, while U.S. law offers less clear grounds, similar to platforms being shielded for user-generated content under Section 230. Even if Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is achieved, the expert argues against making AGI itself a legally liable entity, as it lacks personhood, assets, or a meaningful way to provide remedy for harm. Instead, accountability should rest with the responsible human or corporate entities behind the technology.

cointelegraph56 хв тому

Who is legally liable when an AI agent goes rogue?

cointelegraph56 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片