CoinDeskPolicyОпубліковано о 2024-05-13Востаннє оновлено о 2024-05-14

Анотація

A U.K. election is expected to happen this year, but it likely won't change the trajectory of the country's crypto policy efforts.

  • The Labour Party is a favorite to win the U.K.'s upcoming general election.
  • Regardless of who is elected, crypto policy should still continue developing as it has been, said Adam Jackson, director of policy at Innovate Finance.
9.6K
Crypto: The Game Is 'Cutthroat': Founder

A U.K. election is not going to derail the progress the country has made when it comes to regulating the crypto sector, industry stakeholders told CoinDesk.

An election date has not been announced yet, but it is expected to happen in the country this year. The ruling Conservative party – which has been in government for nearly 14 years, since it was first elected in May 2010 – has ushered in a sweep of crypto measures. The party set out to make the country a crypto hub in 2022 and has since introduced a markets bill to enable crypto to be regulated as a financial activity by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Now the Conservatives have promised to put in place legislation for stablecoins and staking in the coming weeks – before the next election. Many believe that is a realistic goal.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The country needs secondary legislation that formally tasks the FCA with regulating crypto, including stablecoins, said Adam Jackson, director of policy at Innovate Finance, in an interview.

"That's what the government said they would do," Jackson said. "We haven't heard otherwise as to why that's not feasible. So all things being equal they should have those powers by the time of the national election."

Laura Navaratnam, U.K. policy lead at the Crypto Council for Innovation, agreed that the Conservative government at the moment is "definitely" on track adding that even the country's regulators – the Bank of England and the FCA – have been moving forward by publishing discussion papers on stablecoins.

"There is always the risk with any level of political turbulence that some of that stuff could slow down," Navaratnam told CoinDesk in an interview.

Labour

The Conservatives may have a couple of months left before an election is announced, but once it is they will have to go head to head with their opposition party and could lose power. The current favorite to win is the Labour party, according to an Ipsos poll that surveyed over 1,000 people in April. The poll shows that 44% of voters intend to vote Labour while only 19% intend to vote for the Conservatives.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The U.K. recently hosted a local election which showed a large swing towards the Labour party and marked major losses for the Conservatives. Labour managed to attain 1,158 local councilor seats and gained 186 whereas the Conservatives only attained 515, and lost 474, falling behind the Liberal Democrat party also, BBC data showed.

The size of the majority in an election matters, Jackson said.

"I think for any party, the smaller the majority, the more they will be constrained in what they do in some of these areas," Jackson said.

Labour so far has indicated that it wants to make the U.K. a securities tokenization hub in its plan for the financial sector. Tokenization is the process of creating a digital representation of a real thing including financial assets. A tokenization regime is something that people in the country have been calling out for.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"We’re pleased to see that Labour have committed to helping turn the U.K. into a global hub for digital tokenization as part of the party’s policies for the financial services sector," CryptoUK said in February.

However, Labour did not say much about how it plans to regulate crypto.

"So I think the question we have is, you know, what's the Labour approach on that? It's not a question that they can ignore," Jackson said.

Labour said in its report that this was only the "first stage in outlining Labour’s vision for the future of Britain’s financial services," indicating more information may come.

"I think there's a long time between now and an election and so I wouldn't expect them to further the details out at this point," said Varun Paul, senior director and business lead for CBDC and financial market infrastructure at Fireblocks. "I'm pleased – I don't think that digital assets are proving to be a political hot potato at the moment, I think we're lucky in the U.K. that it's not become a political battleground like it has been in the U.S."

Some lawmakers in the U.S. have been calling for a central bank digital currency to be banned while others want the country to conduct a CBDC pilot. Meanwhile, across the pond, Labour indicated that it intends to support the Bank of Englands' digital pound work in its report.

"We should see quite a stable approach to financial services, regulation and things going in the same direction," Jackson said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Пов'язані матеріали

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手30 хв тому

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手30 хв тому

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit2 год тому

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片