CoinDeskPolicyОпубліковано о 2024-05-08Востаннє оновлено о 2024-05-09

Анотація

The startup's plan to launch a custody operation followed by SEC-compliant crypto trading missed its first-quarter target, but the firm says it's just finishing up some techni...

  • Prometheum has fallen several weeks behind the date it said the business would open for crypto custody, and its CEO said the company is trying to finish technology related to its wallet system before launching.
  • The firm has said it'll begin holding crypto securities for clients before starting its trading operations.

Much of the crypto sector has been apprehensive about the ribbon cutting on Prometheum's custody and trading operations, which the firm said will fully comply with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) demands. The doors have so far stayed shut well past the target date, but the company explained it's still finishing a process for auditing smart contracts.

"We expect completion soon and will move towards the launch of our custodial services for institutional clients imminently thereafter," said Prometheum Inc.'s co-CEO Benjamin Kaplan, in a statement to CoinDesk.

Prometheum is a crypto-native startup that's the first to get a special-purpose broker dealer approval under SEC regulations and is now licensed to hold, trade and clear transactions in crypto securities. Its executives had originally said they'd have a custody operation rolling in the first quarter of this year – a date now more than five weeks past. But Kaplan said the firm is "excited to be nearing the public launch of its custodial services for institutional clients."

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Building proprietary technology subject to federal securities laws requires us to meet the high standards set by our regulators and expected by our clients," he said. "We have been finalizing a rigorous smart contract auditing process conducted by a leading auditing firm."

A spokesman, who declined to name the auditing firm, said Prometheum's wallet system uses smart-contract technology. He said ironing that out represents the only significant holdup before opening.

Every week that Prometheum delays is another week that existing businesses wait to find out whether a crypto custodian and broker dealer can hold and trade tokens by treating them – including the marquee asset of Ethereum's ether (ETH) – as securities. So far, the SEC hasn't blocked the company's progress through its chain of registrations, and SEC Chair Gary Gensler has even referred to its efforts as a sign of progress.

Prometheum said it intends to provide custody for ether, the second-largest token by market share, and when asked what other tokens the company may handle, the spokesman said the firm doesn't yet have any further asset names to announce.

The wider crypto industry has been embroiled with the SEC in legal battles raging across several federal courts, in which digital assets exchanges and other companies are insisting that the regulator is wrong about its position that most tokens are securities. Prometheum, the first firm to get the special broker-dealer license, represents the contrarian view that Gensler and his agency are right, and many industry insiders and their allies among Republican lawmakers have chastised the company's executives and accused Prometheum of being an SEC pet project.

Advertisement
Advertisement

If Prometheum is correct, it could become a live demonstration of Gensler's view on cryptocurrencies as securities, which he argues belong under the jurisdiction of existing U.S. securities law and SEC oversight. Issuers of securities must be registered with the agency and submit to an array of disclosures and examinations, and the securities themselves must also be registered – requirements that many industry proponents say crypto companies and decentralized organizations would find impossible to meet.

Prometheum's leaders say they intend it to be a one-stop shop where investors – institutional and retail – will one day be able to keep their digital tokens, trade them on its alternative trading system (ATS) and deal in the future of tokenized assets.

It's not yet clear who the company's first customers will be.

"We cannot say anything regarding specific clients now, but as always Prometheum Capital expects to be used by all ranges of institutions who require compliant access to digital asset securities including institutional investors and traders, asset management firms, family offices, hedge funds, registered investment advisors (RIAs), banks, and financial institutions," according to the spokesman.

The company had said its trading operation – the more high-profile test of its business model – was supposed to get started as soon as this second quarter of 2024, though it's unclear whether the custody delay will push off that timeline, too.

Brothers Benjamin and Aaron Kaplan have shared leadership of the company. Co-CEO Aaron Kaplan is set to appear at the Consensus 2024 event later this month.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Пов'язані матеріали

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报26 хв тому

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报26 хв тому

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbit38 хв тому

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbit38 хв тому

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手40 хв тому

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手40 хв тому

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

**"Invest Only When Certain": A Nine-Year Retrospective from a VC Across Four Cycles** IOSG founder Jocy shares hard-earned lessons from nine years and over a hundred investments in Web3. The core challenge isn't identifying successful founders, but understanding why talented founders with solid ideas still fail. Through building a "failed founder database," IOSG identified six recurring failure patterns. **Founder Trait Red Flags:** 1. **Emotionally Unstable:** Founders who react defensively to criticism or publicly lash out under pressure (e.g., 80% drawdowns) often fail. Resilience is key. 2. **Lacking Hunger / Having a Fallback:** Founders with significant safety nets (family wealth, cushy fallback jobs) may lack the "do-or-die" commitment needed to survive crypto's brutal cycles. 3. **Unchecked Ego:** Includes "polished execution machines" who excel in known frameworks but struggle when paradigms shift, and "professor-types" who are technically brilliant but resistant to commercial feedback or coaching. **Project Structure Red Flags:** 4. **Token-First, Not Product-First:** Treating the token solely as a fundraising tool with no real utility or connection to product value is a major warning sign. The project should have value even if the token goes to zero. 5. **No Day-1 Exit Thesis:** Founders must have a clear, staged capital strategy from the start, understanding what each funding round needs to prove to unlock the next. "Exit before entry" is crucial. 6. **No Full-Cycle Experience:** Founders who haven't lived through a complete crypto bull/bear cycle (e.g., 2018, 2022) often underestimate their vulnerability. IOSG limits initial checks for such teams to $250k, sizing for risk. **The Positive Flipside: Desirable Founder Traits** The ideal candidate exhibits: obsessive problem-depth, being a second-time founder with a non-consensus vision, strong communication skills with *controlled* ego, relentless perseverance, and a global perspective with agency and taste (increasingly vital in the AI era). **Three Survival Tips for Founders:** 1. **Cash Flow Over Narrative:** Real revenue is what sustains projects, not vanity metrics. 2. **Tokens Are a Liability:** Avoid issuing a token unless absolutely necessary. The hidden costs (market making, liquidity, compliance) are immense, often a multi-million-dollar burden. 3. **Respect Liquidity:** Sell during peaks to build treasury, buy back to support the protocol during troughs. Be realistic about valuations and your ability to deliver for the next round. The final principle is simple yet paramount: **"If it's a borderline 'yes' or 'no,' don't invest."** In an industry that reinvents itself every few years, the discipline to consistently say "no" is the ultimate secret to longevity.

Foresight News1 год тому

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片