21Shares Secures Approval to Launch Spot Dogecoin ETF on Nasdaq

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-12

Анотація

21Shares has received approval to launch a spot Dogecoin ETF on the Nasdaq under the ticker TDOG. This marks the third such ETF after Grayscale and Bitwise introduced similar products in November. The ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index, with custody services provided by Coinbase, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo. At the time of writing, Dogecoin's price was trading at $0.136, down 2.06% from its intraday high, while daily trading volume surged over 150% to $1.23 billion. Technical indicators show a neutral RSI at 48 and a stabilizing MACD, with key support at $0.13–$0.125 and resistance near $0.145–$0.15.

21Shares has officially entered the spot Dogecoin ETF race, announcing its product with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. As it follows an automatic approval to list on the Nasdaq stock market under the ticker TDOG.

As per the 21Shares filing to the U.S. SEC, it has submitted its final prospectus to launch its Dogecoin ETF, which clearly shows the progress toward its launch this week.

This ETF joins the expanding list of Dogecoin-focused investment instruments, which secures the third spot Dogecoin ETF to launch after Grayscale Dogecoin ETF (GDOG) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) launched in November. With that, the broadening ETF market could boost market interest and support price gains for DOGE.

As the Exchange-Traded Funds are passive funds designed to track the price of Dogecoin alongside other cryptocurrencies, gaining mainstream investment exposure, while the 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index, where the custody services are provided by Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital Bank, and BitGo Bank & Trust.

DOGE Price Shows Mixed Signals

While the article is being written, Dogecoin price is trading at $0.136, down about 2.06% from its intraday high, which was around $0.14237. But the market interest was raised, as the daily trading volume increased by more than 150% to $1.23 billion, despite the increased trading activity surges, DOGE’s price movement is mixed.

With that, analysing the 1-day chart of (DOGE/USDT), the Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits near 48, sitting in the neutral territory, neither overbought nor oversold region, which puts it right in the middle ground, not showing any extreme buying or selling pressure.

Meanwhile, the Moving Average Divergence and Convergence (MACD) is still in positive territory but has started to settle down. So, the immediate support is located between $0.13 and $0.125, while resistance remains near the $0.145–$0.15 range; a strong break above this is needed to confirm the next direction.

Highlighted Crypto News:

South Korea Plans to End Corporate Crypto Ban With 5% Equity Cap

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the ticker symbol for the 21Shares Spot Dogecoin ETF on the Nasdaq?

AThe ticker symbol for the 21Shares Spot Dogecoin ETF is TDOG.

QWhich two companies had already launched a spot Dogecoin ETF before 21Shares?

AGrayscale and Bitwise had already launched spot Dogecoin ETFs (GDOG and BWOW) before 21Shares.

QWhat index is the 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF designed to track?

AThe 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index.

QWhat was the approximate daily trading volume for Dogecoin mentioned in the article, and what was its percentage increase?

AThe daily trading volume for Dogecoin was approximately $1.23 billion, representing an increase of more than 150%.

QAccording to the technical analysis in the article, what is the key resistance level for DOGE's price?

AThe key resistance level for DOGE's price is near the $0.145–$0.15 range.

Пов'язані матеріали

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit27 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit27 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手33 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手33 хв тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 год тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси