手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-07Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-07

Анотація

本期以SocialFi为主题。

原创|Odaily星球日报

作者|Lucaskog

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

ConsenSys 旗下 zkEVM L2 Linea 联合 Layer 3 于 2 月 20 日推出了 Web3 游戏任务 Linea Park,持续 6 周至 4 月 2 日。用户可以在 Linea Park 中发现、参与头部项目,同时赚取 Linea LXP。

Odaily星球日报在上周四的教程中,分享了 Linea Park 前两周任务的详细指南

本周,借 Linea Park 开启新一期以 SocialFi 为主题的活动,我们将于本文通过介绍活动内的 8 个板块项目的基本信息(其中 Sonorus 板块尚未开放),为读者带来手把手交互教程。

第二期的小尾巴

Enders Gate

Enders Gate 是一款 Web3 集换式卡牌游戏,玩家可以使用由 30 张 NFT 数字卡组成的自定义卡组进行交易和战斗。

访问 Enders Gate 并使用 Metamask 钱包登录。进入游戏,新手教程会指引参与者完成一场战斗,了解基本的游戏玩法。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

使用“Deck Builder”创建一个免费使用的卡牌,点击卡牌右侧的 Add 即可。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南用免费使用的卡牌构建自己的卡组,卡组必须含 25 张牌以上才能进入战斗。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

点击左上角「Arena」进入竞技场,根据游戏玩法与新手教程,完成一场对战即可。详细教程和简介请参阅官方白皮书

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

第三期任务

Dmail

由人工智能 (AI) 驱动的一个中心化的信息传递系统。旨在有效管理与钱包地址和其他去中心化身份(DID)相关的通信,Dmail 网络了 Web2 电子邮件通信和 Web3 环境之间的鸿沟。

进入官网,选择钱包登陆 Dmail。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

点击座左上角的「compose」,进入编辑页面,下方的网络选择 Linea Mainnet,填写接收地址(Web2、Web3邮箱都可以),随便编辑一下内容,然后点击「Send」即可。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

Gamic

Gamic 一款结合了 SocialFi 和 GameFi 于一体的去中心化社交平台,将聊天功能、社区建设工具和钱包合并到一个界面中。

首先,下载手机端 APP,连接钱包绑定邮箱登陆,创建个人信息。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

其次点击钱包,点击「+」,将 Linea ETH 添加进钱包。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

将任意金额的 ETH 与任何代币进行一次 Swap 即可。

AsMatch

AsMatch 是一款 Web3 SocialFi 应用,通过聊天结交朋友来获取每周 $ASM 奖励。

打开网站,Mint 一个 NFT 即可(费用大概在 2 到 3 美元)。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

BitAvatar

BitAvatar 使用 Lens 协议构建,允许参与者自定义头像并在多个领域进行社交等。

进入官网,连接推特,设置一个属于自己的头像(NFT),大概需要 3 到 4 美元。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

第二步,进行每日签到活动获取 BitAvatar XP。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

Read On

 ReadOn 是一个的 Web3 内容聚合平台,通过编写内容来赚取积分。

进入官网,点击「Curate」,进去连接钱包,授权推特,关注 ReadOn。输入一串内容后再次点击「Curate」即可。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

Sending Me

Sending Labs 事Web3 项目构建去中心化加密基础设施的产品工作室。他们的产品被用于组织、管理和发展社区,并且保持对用户数据的所有权。其中,SendingNetwork 是他们的旗舰产品,提供了一个去中心化的加密通信服务网络。

前往 Sending Me 网站,连接钱包,写入官方邀请码(park 01)。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

设置姓名和头像,然后点击继续。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

接着点击「Community」,进入社区。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

加入社区后,点击「general lounge」然后点击「+」图标。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

点击「Money Gun」,如下图所示。手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

设置要发送的代币数量,点击「Fire」,钱包确认即可。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

详细教程以及更多项目细节请查看官方文档

SocialScan

SocialScan 一款去中心化社交软件。SocialScan 提供钱包到钱包聊天和专业见解等功能,可增强您的游戏策略和联系。

进入主页,需要连接钱包、推特、Discord 和绑定邮箱后点击「register」。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

点击「Claim」,Mint 一个 NFT,费用大概在 3 到 4 美元。

手把手交互教程:Linea Park第三周任务指南

活动仍在持续更新,后续任务敬请关注 Odaily星球日报,获取最新教程。

Пов'язані матеріали

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

"Rented Faith: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money?" Bitcoin ETF inflows are often seen as a barometer of institutional conviction. However, week-to-week analysis reveals they are primarily driven by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than directional bullishness. This is the cash-and-carry trade: buying the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in the price difference (basis). This delta-neutral activity registers as ETF inflows but reflects a rate-seeking, not price-betting, strategy. Data shows weekly ETF flow volatility is closely tied to hedge fund ("leveraged funds") short positions on CME futures, with a correlation of 0.70. About half of weekly flow variation can be explained by this single factor. In contrast, Bitcoin's weekly price changes have no statistically significant power to predict flows. Crucially, while this arbitrage trade dominates weekly *fluctuations*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the ~$55 billion total net inflow, the estimated net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The vast majority is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The "rented" arbitrage capital churns, while "owned" directional capital forms the bedrock. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund shorts peaking at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and falling to ~$4.5 billion. Recent outflows align with basis compression, signaling the trade's exit, not a loss of faith. For Ethereum ETFs, the same dynamic is weaker due to negative carry from forgone staking yield. The key takeaway: To interpret ETF flows, watch the basis vs. Treasury yields and CME hedge fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the weekly "demand" headline is driven by rented, rate-seeking capital versus real conviction.

链捕手3 хв тому

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

链捕手3 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手25 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手25 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbit49 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbit49 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片