2025 CEX Listing Guide: 2147 Projects Listed, Trading Volume Plummets 55%; Who's Profiting, Who's Just Along for the Ride?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-23Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-23

Анотація

2025 was a pivotal year for crypto CEX listings, marked by significant volatility. A total of 2,147 new token listings were recorded across major exchanges, with 65% being primary listings. However, the market faced a sharp downturn in Q4 after Bitcoin fell below $100,000 in October, leading to a 55% collapse in global trading volume. Among the top-tier "BCOBB" exchanges (Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, Bitget), 678 tokens were listed. 71% of these were primary listings, with Bitget accounting for nearly half. A total of 150 tokens achieved "AAA" status by launching on two or more top exchanges simultaneously. Most tokens launched with a Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) between $101 million and $500 million. The most popular sectors for new listings were L1 Blockchains (249), Memecoins (191), and Gaming (165). Listings were heavily concentrated on weekdays, with Thursday being the most popular day. Following the October market crash, only 23% of tokens posted positive performance in Q4. This analysis provides a crucial guide to the changing dynamics and rising barriers to entry in the secondary market.

Author: OpenWorld

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: 2025 was a year of dramatic changes for the crypto market. This annual report from OpenWorld provides a deep dive into the listing performance of major centralized exchanges (CEXs) throughout the year with detailed data. Among the 2147 listing events, which sectors were most favored? How did market liquidity change drastically after Bitcoin (BTC) fell below $100,000 in October?

From Binance to Bitget, what are the similarities and differences in the listing strategies of the top-tier exchanges (BCOBB)? This article breaks down the code to CEX listings in 2025, offering insights into valuation distribution, listing timing, and the underlying logic of sector rotation. It is an essential guide to understanding the current barriers to entry in the secondary market.

Full Text Below:

Key Insights into CEX Listings

  • 2147 listings recorded in 2025: Across the major exchanges we monitored, Primary Listings accounted for 65%.
  • Most CEXs experienced negative growth in 2025: Kucoin was the only exchange that showed positive growth.
  • Trading volume shrank as BTC price fell: Since BTC dropped below $100,000 in October 2025, market trading activity and investor sentiment were hit, leading to a decline in volume.
  • The first-tier "BCOBB" exchanges listed a total of 678 coins: 71% of these were same-day primary listings, with Bitget accounting for roughly half.
  • High-quality AAA-grade TGEs (Token Generation Events) were highly successful: 150 tokens were listed on 2 or more of the "Big 5" exchanges simultaneously.
  • FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) Distribution: The FDV of most tokens at listing was concentrated between $101 million and $500 million.

Listing Update: Month-over-Month Overview

In 2025, the major exchanges we monitored recorded a total of 2147 listings. The fourth quarter saw 479 listings, a decrease of about 23% compared to Q3, a slight increase of about 1% compared to Q2, and a decrease of about 16% compared to Q1.

Tier Snapshot: Comprehensive Overview

Q1 and Q4 saw a rising trend in high-quality AAA token listings; the quality of listings in Q2 and Q3 fluctuated wildly with extreme variance.

Note: AAA tokens refer to those listed on 2 or more BCOBB exchanges; AA tokens refer to those listed on only 1 BCOBB exchange; A tokens refer to all other tokens not listed on any BCOBB exchange.

Listing Update: Year-to-Date (YTD) Week-over-Week Overview

Until early October, the number of weekly listings remained relatively stable. However, the altcoin crash on October 10th materially altered the frequency of new coin issuances.

Exchange Volume Snapshot: Month-over-Month Analysis

Following the liquidation event on October 10, 2025, trading volume on major mainstream CEXs shrunk dramatically in Q4. By the end of the year, global cryptocurrency trading volume had decreased by approximately 55%, while BTC's price performance remained relatively flat throughout the 12-month period.

BCOBB Snapshot (Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, Bitget): Overview

Among the "Big Five" (BCOBB) exchanges, there were 678 listings in 2025. Of these, 479 were primary spot listings, meaning approximately 71% of the listings were primary. A total of 150 tokens were cross-listed on 2 or more of the "Big Five" exchanges.

BCOBB Snapshot: FDV Distribution at Listing

In 2025, tokens listed on all major CEXs covered all 5 FDV ranges. The densest distribution was in the $101 million to $500 million range, highlighting strong market interest in projects with lower valuations.

BCOBB Snapshot: Binance

Tokens listed on Binance in 2025 covered all 5 FDV ranges.

BCOBB Snapshot: Coinbase

Tokens listed on Coinbase in 2025 also covered all 5 FDV ranges.

BCOBB Snapshot: OKX

Tokens listed on OKX in 2025 covered 5 FDV ranges, although no new coins were listed in August 2025.

BCOBB Snapshot: Bybit

Tokens listed on Bybit in 2025 covered all 5 FDV ranges.

<极>

BCOBB Snapshot: Bitget

Tokens listed on Bitget in 2025 covered all 5 FDV ranges.

BCOBB Snapshot: Top Performers

Token performance varied significantly across exchanges, but in Q4 2025, approximately 23% of tokens achieved positive growth.

Note: Performance is calculated from the listing date on each exchange. For tokens cross-listed at different times and on different dates, performance data will vary across platforms.

Listing Update: Distribution of Listing Days Within a Week

Only 4% of projects chose to list on weekends, with weekdays still dominating. In 2025, Thursday was the most popular listing day of the week.

Listing Update: Popular Sectors

In 2025, the most popular sub-sectors by number of listings were: L1 Blockchains (249), Memecoins (191), and Gaming (165).

This concludes our in-depth analysis of CEX listings in 2025. Stay tuned, as we will soon be releasing our analysis on token launches and valuations in 2025.

Пов'язані питання

QHow many new listings were recorded on major CEXs in 2025, and what percentage were primary listings?

AIn 2025, 2147 new listings were recorded on major CEXs, with 65% of them being primary listings.

QWhat was the overall trend in trading volume on CEXs in 2025, and what key event triggered a significant change?

AGlobal cryptocurrency trading volume declined by approximately 55% in 2025. A major altcoin crash on October 10th, which coincided with Bitcoin falling below $100,000, triggered a sharp contraction in trading volume.

QAmong the 'Big 5' (BCOBB) exchanges, how many tokens were listed, and what was unique about Bitget's share?

AThe 'Big 5' exchanges had a combined 678 listings in 2025. Bitget accounted for nearly half of all the listings on these top-tier exchanges.

QWhat was the most common FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) range for tokens listed on major CEXs in 2025?

AThe most密集的 FDV distribution for listed tokens was in the range of $101 million to $500 million.

QWhich three crypto sectors had the highest number of new token listings in 2025?

AThe three sectors with the most new token listings in 2025 were Layer 1 Blockchains (249), Memecoins (191), and Gaming (165).

Пов'язані матеріали

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit23 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit23 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手29 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手29 хв тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1 год тому

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1 год тому

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1 год тому

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片