2025 Blockchain Financing Overview: Who Pocketed Over $20 Billion?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-01-07Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-07

Анотація

In 2025, the blockchain sector saw a significant shift in venture capital trends, with $23.7 billion invested across 839 deals—marking a 33.6% drop in deal count but a substantial increase in total funding compared to 2024. Capital moved from broad investments to focused, high-quality targets. Centralized Finance (CeFi) dominated with $11.2 billion raised, driven by mega-deals like Binance's $2 billion raise and Coinbase's $2.9 billion acquisition of Deribit. Infrastructure and tools remained robust with $4.9 billion across 243 deals, while DeFi secured $1.75 billion. Web3 gaming experienced a sharp decline, with funding and deals falling over 60%. AI and blockchain integration grew steadily, raising $884 million. Prediction markets, led by Polymarket and Kalshi, attracted $3.56 billion. The trend emphasized larger, strategic investments over quantity, with family offices and major funds leading capital deployment.

Author: Zen, PANews

As capital shifts from broad distribution to targeted allocation, the market is now driven by "quality" rather than "quantity." In the quiet reshuffle of 2025, centralized finance (CeFi) has returned to the center stage with massive financing, the integration narrative of Web3 and AI is steadily advancing, infrastructure and DeFi remain the backbone, while once-booming Web3 gaming has faded into the background.

PANews compiled 839 disclosed financing events in the blockchain primary market for 2025, tracking the flow of $23.7 billion to understand capital choices and identify the next value hotspots.

Overall Market Review: Doubled Financing Scale Amid Declining Deal Count

According to PANews' incomplete statistics, the blockchain primary market disclosed 839 investment and financing events in 2025, with a total funding amount exceeding $23.7 billion. In terms of the number of financings, the disclosed transactions in 2025 decreased significantly compared to 1,259 in 2024, a year-on-year drop of approximately 33.6%; however, the funding inflow in 2025 increased substantially, far surpassing the $9.3 billion in 2024.

Unlike the decline, caution, and rationality seen in the primary market from 2023 to 2024, 2025 overall showed a significant warming trend. The total number of financings and the funding scale for the year both reached about half the levels of the 2022 bull market—which had 1,660 investment and financing events with a total funding of over $34.8 billion.

Although the market warmed significantly overall, the trends in the primary market remained largely similar to 2023 and 2024, only more extreme—from a funding inflow perspective, 2025 still had two peak periods in the first and second halves of the year, concentrated in March-May and October-November, respectively.

This was mainly influenced by ultra-large financing events: in March, Abu Dhabi's MGX invested $2 billion in Binance for a minority stake; in October, NYSE parent ICE made a $2 billion strategic investment in Polymarket at a $9 billion post-money valuation. Prediction market Kalshi raised over $300 million in a new funding round, valuing the company at $5 billion; in November, Kalshi completed another $1 billion financing, increasing its valuation to $11 billion.

Additionally, from March to May, Kraken acquired NinjaTrader for $1.5 billion, Ripple acquired Hidden Road for $1.25 billion, and Coinbase acquired Deribit for $2.9 billion, setting the record for the largest transaction in 2025.

Subsequently, by the end of the second quarter and throughout the third quarter of 2025, the market largely replicated the calm of the past two years. However, entering the fourth quarter, the investment and financing market quickly saw the hottest month of 2025: October. This month saw both volume and value surge, with 87 investment and financing events disclosed and over $3.9 billion in funding inflows. Excluding the impact of ultra-large financings significantly boosting the total funding, the number of financing transactions in October was also the highest for the year.

After peaking in October, as the secondary market weakened and the trend turned from bull to bear, the number of publicly disclosed financing transactions plummeted to 52 in November, the lowest monthly value in 2025. However, large single financings such as Kalshi's $1 billion funding round and Ripple's $500 million strategic investment that month kept the total financing amount high.

From an industry development perspective, investment institutions favored narratives mainly centered on centralized finance involving stablecoins and payment concepts, as well as infrastructure companies, with exchanges and prediction markets being particularly standout in fundraising ability.

Based on market hotspots and continuity, PANews broadly categorized projects into DeFi, Web3 gaming, infrastructure & tools, AI, centralized finance, and other Web3 applications including prediction markets, DePIN, social, DeSci, etc., and compiled statistics on each sector's investment and financing situation.

Infrastructure & Tools: Significant Increase in Large Financings, Payment and Settlement Areas Favored

In 2025, the infrastructure and tools sector disclosed a total of 243 investment and financing events, raising over $4.9 billion, with an average financing amount of approximately $20.3 million.

Of all financing events disclosed in 2025, about 28.96% belonged to infrastructure & tools, basically flat with 2024; however, the amount raised by this sector accounted for about 20.78% of the total, a significant decrease from 39.46% in 2024.

Nevertheless, the infrastructure & tools sector still disclosed the most large financing news, with 101 investment and financing events at the tens of millions of dollars level and above, accounting for 41.56%, significantly higher than 27.82% in 2024; there were 12 financings reaching hundreds of millions of dollars, double that of the previous year.

In October 2025, blockchain payment infrastructure project Tempo completed a $50 million Series A financing at a $5 billion valuation, led by Thrive Capital and Greenoaks, with participation from Sequoia, Ribbit Capital, etc.; in November, Ripple raised $50 million through institutional investors like Fortress Investment and Citadel Securities, valuing it at $40 billion. The above two transactions were the largest financings in this sector last year, both in the direction of crypto payment infrastructure.

DeFi: Foundation Remains Stable, Financing Activity Surges Against the Trend at Year-End

In 2025, DeFi remained the most watched vertical sector after infrastructure. The sector disclosed a total of 201 investment and financing events throughout the year, with funding inflows exceeding $1.748 billion, accounting for 24.04% and 7.36% respectively, the former basically flat with 2024, while the latter was significantly lower than 18.22% in 2024.

Among the financing news disclosed by DeFi projects, 41 had financing scales in the tens of millions of dollars, accounting for 20.39%, exceeding 13.51% in 2024. However, in distribution, they were still more concentrated in the range of several million dollars.

In November 2025, although the overall primary market transaction count hit its lowest point, the DeFi sector "suddenly surged," not only seeing the number of project financings rebound to 18, exceeding the annual average of 16, but also setting the highest funding inflow record for the past year, receiving over $445 million.

Additionally, three of the top ten financings and acquisitions in the DeFi sector in 2025 occurred in November: Bitcoin lending platform Lava raised $20 million in new funding, Paxos acquired DeFi wallet startup Fordefi for over $10 million, and decentralized exchange protocol Lighter received $6.8 million in financing.

Web3 Gaming: Popularity Declines Sharply, Financing Scale and Number Halved

Web3 gaming continued its decline in 2025—a result known even before official statistics. The sector disclosed 57 investment and financing events throughout the year, raising $30.8 million, while the 2024 figures were 178 and $84.9 million, respectively. In terms of transaction count, Web3 gaming decreased by 67.98%; in terms of funding scale, the drop was 63.72%. From any angle, the Web3 gaming sector showed clear signs of weakness.

Trend-wise, excluding the impact of the overall industry correction in May, the gaming sector generally declined over time. By the fourth quarter, it had weakened to its lowest point, with no financing news for gaming projects disclosed in December. Continuing this trend, Web3 gaming in 2026 will likely follow NFTs, social, and other sectors, becoming difficult to form a sizable dedicated category in statistics.

Furthermore, the active investment institutions in this sector are basically只剩下 focused gaming sector VCs like Bitkraft Ventures, Griffin Gaming Partners, and Animoca Brands. Among them, Web3 VC Animoca Brands has invested in over 628 portfolio companies, about 200 of which are gaming projects.

Web3 + AI: Steady Progress in Narrative Integration

With the development of artificial intelligence, how to integrate with it has become a key proposition for the tech industry, and the fusion of AI with blockchain and cryptocurrency is also showing an upward trend. In 2025, the Web3+ AI sector disclosed 111 financings, with a funding scale of $88.4 million, both growing over 20%.

Due to statistical caliber issues, considering there are many blockchain projects that only integrate AI functions and applications rather than specializing in AI, the actual funding involved in this field might be even higher.

Looking at the annual trend, the Web3+ AI sector was the most stable direction. During the low periods of the second and third quarters, it instead entered its "best period," with both transaction count and financing scale reaching their highest values in July.

In terms of funding scale, AI projects receiving tens of millions of dollars accounted for 26.12% in 2025, significantly exceeding 15.2% in 2024, showing a steady and progressive development trend. In August 2025, AI compliance platform IVIX, which fights crypto financial crime, completed a $6 million Series B financing, setting the highest record for single financing scale in this sector.

Centralized Finance: A "Bumper Year," with Huge Financings and High Valuations Becoming the Norm

2025 was a "bumper year" for the centralized finance sector: it disclosed 120 investment and financing events throughout the year, with a funding scale of $11.2 billion. Compared to 2024, the former doubled, while the latter increased nearly 8 times.

Centralized finance has historically been the vertical sector with the highest average financing amount in the entire industry, reaching $93.37 million in 2025. This was mainly due to large acquisitions like Coinbase's $2.9 billion acquisition of Deribit and Binance's single $2 billion ultra-large financing event significantly boosting the funding scale. Even ignoring these large transactions, the centralized finance sector overall still performed well: the sector had 73 investment and financings reaching the tens of millions level, accounting for a high 60.83%, further increasing from the already high base of 43.48% in 2024.

Additionally, compared to only Hashkey's financing amount approaching the hundred million dollar level in 2024, there were 7 financing events with scales in the hundred million range throughout 2025. Among them, US veteran crypto exchange Kraken secured two financings in the hundred millions, and Citadel Securities received a single strategic investment as high as $20 million.

It is worth mentioning that Korean tech giant Naver is acquiring Dunamu, the parent company of cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, for $10.3 billion. The transaction is an all-stock merger expected to be completed in June 2026, so it is temporarily not included in the 2025 statistics.

Others: Prediction Markets Lead Hotspots

The "Others" category includes prediction markets, DePIN, crypto mining, DAO, DeSci, social platforms, and other blockchain application directions. It should be noted that although prediction markets were undoubtedly the hottest topic in 2025, due to their lack of continuity and funding almost entirely concentrated on the duopoly of Polymarket and Kalshi, they are temporarily classified under "Others."

In 2025, this sector disclosed 107 investment and financing events, with a financing scale of $4.376 billion. Among them, prediction market financing alone amounted to $3.561 billion—Polymarket received a single $2 billion financing, and Kalshi followed closely, completing three rounds of financing within months from mid-year, raising a total of $1.485 billion.

In terms of funding scale, besides prediction markets, crypto mining, DePIN projects, and consumer projects also secured large financings. Among them, US Bitcoin miner manufacturer Auradine completed a $15.3 million financing with participation from StepStone Group, Samsung, Qualcomm, Premji Invest, etc.

Investment Institutions: Prioritizing Quality Over Quantity, Family Office Funds Stand Out

According to PANews' incomplete statistics, 36 crypto investment funds were launched in 2025, a decrease from 47 in 2024; the total scale reached $5.082 billion, exceeding $4.34 billion in 2024.

As cycles turn and the sands shift, many crypto VCs have gradually faded out. In 2025, the investment institution field continued to evolve towards "prioritizing quality over quantity." Among the VCs launching crypto investment funds in 2025, 20 had fundraising scales exceeding $100 million, accounting for 55.5%, double that of 2024.

In October 2025, former Binance Labs, now transformed into a family office, YZi Labs established a $1 billion fund to support BNB ecosystem construction, which was also the largest fund by size in 2025.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the total amount of funds raised in the blockchain sector in 2025, and how did it compare to 2024?

AIn 2025, the blockchain sector raised a total of over $23.7 billion, which was a significant increase compared to the $9.3 billion raised in 2024.

QWhich sector received the highest amount of funding in 2025, and what was the approximate amount?

AThe Centralized Finance (CeFi) sector received the highest amount of funding in 2025, raising approximately $11.2 billion.

QHow did the Web3 gaming sector perform in terms of funding and number of deals in 2025 compared to 2024?

AThe Web3 gaming sector performed poorly in 2025, with only 57 funding deals raising $308 million. This represents a decrease of about 67.98% in deal count and 63.72% in funding amount compared to 2024.

QWhat were the two largest individual funding events mentioned in the article, and which companies were involved?

AThe two largest individual funding events were a $2.9 billion acquisition of Deribit by Coinbase and a $2 billion strategic investment into Binance by Abu Dhabi's MGX.

QWhich emerging trend, in combination with Web3, showed steady growth in funding and deal count in 2025?

AThe combination of Web3 and Artificial Intelligence (AI) showed steady growth, with 111 funding deals raising $884 million, representing an increase of over 20% in both metrics.

Пов'язані матеріали

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit39 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit39 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报42 хв тому

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报42 хв тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit1 год тому

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbit1 год тому

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片