比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-05

Анотація

Meme热搜极值意味着行情见顶:PEPE和WIF出现了较大偏离,但程度远不及21年的DOGE和SHIB。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 南枳

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

2021 年年初,DOGE 掀起了最早一波“动物园行情”为名的 Meme 热潮,而 DOGE 本身最高市值一度达到 887.9 亿美元,彼时 DOGE 成功破圈,在各个社交媒体都广泛传播,引入了大量的新人投资相关币种。

当年 5 月 8 日,DOGE 触及最高点 0.74 USDT,过度火热的市场累积了大量的杠杆头寸, 5 月 12 日比特币下跌 12.5% ,随后更是发生了知名的 519 崩盘,比特币单日振幅 34.8% ,下跌 14.44% 。

“二代 Meme 龙头”SHIB 的两轮行情则分别发生于 21 年 5 月和 10 月末,与 5 月和 11 月的两次见顶时间也相当临近,但破圈效应不及 DOGE。

而近期,以 PEPE 为首的 Meme 代币占领交易所涨幅榜,WIF 也登陆 Robinhood 和币安,是否又预示着一轮破圈并马上到山顶的行情呢?Odaily星球日报将于本文复盘社媒数据与 Meme 代币走势,包括 DOGE、SHIB、PEPE、WIF,探究是否二者有所关联和预示。

破圈传播?尚未开始

先从国内的社媒平台开始聊起。

微博:在 2021 年,大量的官方账号与个人在微博宣发 Web3 行业内容,目前虽大量用户已向 X 平台迁移,但 Meme 币的相关内容依旧能够实时更新并有一定程度的传播。PEPE 所搜内容与加密货币关联紧密,WIF 关联内容较少,多数内容为“WiFi”相关。

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

小红书:该平台上的情况与微博类似,PEPE 关联度极高,但多数发帖时间并非近期点赞量不高说明仍未引发圈外用户 FOMO 和广泛关注。而 WIF 也一样有零散相关内容,时间分布参差,多数与“WiFi”词条相关。

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

即刻:该平台的 Web3 浓度实际上不逊色于微博与小红书,但更主要为正规项目宣发和从业人员交流。目前 PEPE 仅有少数帖子讨论其涨幅,而 WIF 则无人提起。

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

社媒搜索数据回顾

以“百度指数”和“谷歌趋势”为依据回顾 DOGE 与 SHIB 走势,其中“百度指数”为绝对指数,展示特定时间段内的搜索量级,而“谷歌趋势”为绝对值,最大值为 100 ,展示特定时间段内的相对趋势。

DOGE 的价格与社媒搜索数据如下,谷歌数据可见,在 1 月-5 月中,全球对 DOGE 的关注程度近似,而国内更关注后两波行情。并且可以明显看出,一旦在某一日出现了远超均值的热搜,意味着短期行情见顶

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

SHIB 的价格与社媒搜索数据如下,规律与 DOGE 类似,极端的热搜意味着行情的见顶。但可以看出在国内的关注度主要是 5 月的 DOGE 引发的“动物园行情”所带来的,第二轮国内关注度显著下降。

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

PEPE 近一个月的价格与社媒搜索数据如下,其中谷歌趋势由于官方设置原因,不能跨月查询,但经 7 日查询得到,热度与 2 月末没有显著变化。但在国内已经开始出现大幅偏离均值的波动,但偏离程度不及 DOGE 和 SHIB 曾创下的超百倍波动。

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

WIF 近一个月的价格与社媒搜索数据如下,国内对其没有明显的关注变化,值得注意的是,在 3 月 5 日 18 时,即币安公布上线 WIF 现货之后,热度开始飙升,出现了类似 PEPE 的偏离情况。

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

比照DOGE行情与社媒热度关联,PEPE和WIF破圈(见顶)了吗?

结论

综上,Meme 代币的极端热搜往往意味着一段行情的见顶,目前 PEPE 和 WIF 都出现了较大的偏离,意味着风险开始累积,但程度远不及当年的 DOGE 和 SHIB,也没有明显的破圈情况发生,或仍有一定的潜力空间。

Пов'язані матеріали

Fed Turns Hawkish, Wall Street Capitulates, Citi Stands as 'Last Holdout': Insists on Resuming Rate Cuts in October

Amid a surprisingly hawkish shift from the Fed and most of Wall Street capitulating on rate cut expectations, Citigroup stands as a notable outlier, holding firm to its forecast for monetary easing to restart this October. Following the June FOMC meeting, where the "dovish bias" was removed and the dot plot shifted dramatically, markets priced in nearly 37bps of tightening for 2026. Major banks like Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs revised their calls, predicting rate hikes as soon as September. Citigroup, however, maintains a baseline scenario for a 25bps rate cut in October, followed by two more cuts in December and January 2027. Its counter-consensus view rests on three key arguments: 1) Plunging oil prices are eliminating a major inflation upside risk. 2) Rising initial jobless claims are mirroring seasonal weakening patterns seen in 2024-2025, signaling a labor market cool-down. 3) The strong core PCE is an "outlier," heavily influenced by AI-related prices and equity market gains rather than broad consumer price pressures, with other inflation metrics showing more moderation. While Wall Street largely "surrenders" to the hawkish Fed narrative, with Deutsche Bank forecasting two hikes and Goldman Sachs warning of potential back-to-back moves, Citigroup remains the "last holdout," betting that disinflationary forces will pave the way for cuts before year-end.

marsbit2 хв тому

Fed Turns Hawkish, Wall Street Capitulates, Citi Stands as 'Last Holdout': Insists on Resuming Rate Cuts in October

marsbit2 хв тому

Open Systems Will Ultimately Prevail: Why Ethereum Is the Next Linux?

The article "Open Systems Will Ultimately Prevail: Why Ethereum Is the Next Linux?" argues that Ethereum, like Linux before it, will triumph over closed, proprietary systems in finance due to its open, permissionless, and credibly neutral nature. It draws a historical parallel: just as the open internet defeated corporate private networks and Linux outcompeted proprietary Unix systems, open financial infrastructure like Ethereum will surpass private blockchains. The core advantage lies in the "bazaar" development model (as described in Eric Raymond's "The Cathedral and the Bazaar"), where decentralized, permissionless innovation by a global community of developers outpaces the controlled "cathedral" approach of centralized entities. This model fosters rapid innovation, as seen with Ethereum standards like ERC-20 and applications like Uniswap, which were built without needing permission. Ethereum's key, irreplicable strength is its credible neutrality: transparent, equally applicable, immutable rules that allow anyone to participate. This ensures sovereign independence, meaning no single entity (company, government) can control or change its core rules—a critical feature for global financial infrastructure. In contrast, private blockchains and consortium chains (like SWIFT or various bank-led projects) suffer from platform risk, central control, and an inability to attract broad developer ecosystems, leading to frequent failures. The article notes that major institutions (e.g., BlackRock, JPMorgan, Coinbase, Robinhood) are already building on Ethereum or its Layer 2 networks, recognizing its security, developer ecosystem, and network effects. While critics argue finance requires accountable, controlled systems, the response is that compliance (KYC, regulations) can be built at the application layer on top of a neutral settlement layer like Ethereum, just as secure commerce was built on the open internet via HTTPS. Ultimately, the thesis is that attempting to build walled-garden, proprietary financial networks is a flawed strategy that stifles innovation. The winning approach is to build applications on top of open, credibly neutral infrastructure like Ethereum, which is poised to become the foundational settlement layer for global finance.

Foresight News13 хв тому

Open Systems Will Ultimately Prevail: Why Ethereum Is the Next Linux?

Foresight News13 хв тому

The Computing Power Dilemma in the Sino-US AI Rivalry

The Sino-US AI rivalry faces a fundamental bottleneck: the widening compute power gap. While Chinese AI chip companies have seen investment surges, their current focus remains largely on the less demanding inference market. The real challenge lies in the high-end training chip sector, crucial for developing cutting-edge large language models (LLMs), where Nvidia holds a near-monopoly. The compute disparity is stark. US tech giants like Meta, Google, and xAI command massive GPU clusters, enabling them to train trillion-parameter models rapidly. Estimates suggest US data center count and total compute capacity significantly outstrip China's. This "brute force" advantage allows for faster model iteration and exploration of larger parameter scales, with top US models reportedly leading their Chinese counterparts by 8 to 15 months. Chinese alternatives, such as Huawei's Ascend and others from companies like Moore Thread and Biren, are emerging. They show promise in inference and some training scenarios, closing the performance gap with mid-range Nvidia products. However, the core hurdle extends beyond raw chip performance to the entrenched software ecosystem, exemplified by Nvidia's CUDA platform. The path forward involves "walking on two legs": navigating import restrictions while heavily investing in the domestic chip industry. Though still in a catch-up phase, China's vast market, talent pool, and capital are fostering progress. The ultimate test is whether Chinese firms can build a competitive hardware-software ecosystem to power the next generation of AI.

marsbit19 хв тому

The Computing Power Dilemma in the Sino-US AI Rivalry

marsbit19 хв тому

He Kaiming's Team's New Work: After Deleting VAE and Private Data, Text-to-Image Generation Becomes Even Stronger

KaiMing He's team introduces **MiniT2I**, a minimalist text-to-image (T2I) model that challenges the complexity of mainstream approaches. It eliminates components commonly considered essential: the VAE encoder-decoder, AdaLN conditioning mechanisms, auxiliary losses, private training data, and post-training alignment stages like RL/DPO. Instead, it uses a pure flow-matching objective trained directly on RGB pixels. The model employs a simplified **MM-JiT** Transformer architecture. It removes AdaLN blocks for conditioning and instead prepends two lightweight text adapter blocks to a standard pre-norm Transformer, allowing frozen T5 text features to adapt to the denoiser. Training follows a two-stage, LLM-like paradigm using only public datasets: pre-training on LLaVA-recaptioned CC12M for coverage, followed by fine-tuning on ~120k high-quality image-text pairs. With just 258M parameters (B/16), MiniT2I achieves competitive scores (0.87 on GenEval, 84.2 on DPG-Bench), outperforming larger pixel-space models. Scaling to 912M parameters (L/16) yields results comparable to SD3-Medium (~2B parameters) in style, composition, and imagination, though it lags in text rendering and named entities due to public data limitations. Key advantages include lower computational cost (~570 GFLOPs vs. ~1379 for latent models) and architectural simplicity. Acknowledged limitations include patch boundary artifacts in pixel space, side effects of high CFG scales, resolution ceilings for sequences longer than 1024 tokens, and the aforementioned data bottlenecks. The work demonstrates that high-performance T2I generation is possible with a radically simplified, publicly reproducible baseline.

marsbit23 хв тому

He Kaiming's Team's New Work: After Deleting VAE and Private Data, Text-to-Image Generation Becomes Even Stronger

marsbit23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片