盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-05Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-05

Анотація

Solana生态或将迎来空投季，汇总36个潜力项目。

原文作者：Lumus, 加密 KOL

原文编译：Felix, PANews

加密 KOL Lumus 盘点了 Solana 生态 36 个具有潜在空投的项目，您需要：

  • 准备好你的钱包

  • 完成尽可能多的步骤

Phantom（钱包）

  • 访问：https://phantom.app/

  • 创建钱包或导入助记词

  • 在内部进行一些交易

  • 打开 dApp - > 任务 - > Connect Drip

  • 在手机上下载钱包并铸造 NFT（重要）

  • 然后，与一些 DEX 连接即可

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

MagicEden（钱包）

  • 访问网站：https://magiceden.io/

  • 创建钱包

  • 在 Solana 上进行一些交易

  • 桥接到 ETH/BTC

  • 在 MagicEden 上购买一些 NFT，然后通过钱包出售

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Backpack（钱包）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Tensor

  • 访问网站：https://links.tensor.trade/

  • 连接钱包（使用 Backpack 钱包，+ 25% 积分）

  • 交易（买/卖）

  • 做多/做空一些 NFT

目前，这是积分活动的第三季，所以不要忘记推荐活动。

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Exchange ART（NFT）

  • 访问网站： https://exchange.art/

  • 连接钱包

  • 填写个人资料

  • 铸造 NFT

  • 创建新系列藏品

  • 订阅一些作者

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Drip（NFT 市场）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Sniper（NFT 市场）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Solana Mobile（手机）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Layer 3 （任务平台）

  • 访问网站：https://linktr.ee/layer3xyz

  • 连接 SOL 钱包

  • 填写个人资料（使用您的 EVM 和 SOL 钱包）

  • 打开任务选项 - > Solana

  • 完成任务

这是为其他 DeFi 空投做的准备。

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Bags（SocialFi）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Solana TG 机器人

Whales Market

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Drift Protocol（DEX）

交易：

  • 做多/做空代币

  • 保留订单至少 10 分钟

  • 增加交易量

Earn：

  • 质押 USDC

注意：解除质押的期限为 13 天。盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Parcl

  • 访问网站：https://app.parcl.co/

  • 连接钱包

  • 存入一些 USDC

  • 通过推荐获得奖金

  • 质押 USDC（1 美元 = 4 积分）

  • 交易期货

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Zeta（DEX）

不要忘记 3 美元的交易费用。盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Backpack（Exchange）

免责声明：每实现 1 万美元交易，就会损失 9 美元。

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Jupiter（DEX）

  • 访问网站：https://jup.ag/

  • 交易量达到 1 万美元

  • 使用期货

  • 交易量达到 3 万美元

  • 购买和使用 JLP

  • 使用 DCA（可选）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Monaco Protocol

有两个博彩平台：Purebet、BetDEX。以下步骤对两者都有价值：

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Solblaze（质押）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Jito（质押）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Marinade（质押）

注意取消质押的费用。盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

MarginFi（质押/借贷）

奖励机制：

  • 借出 1 美元 = 1 积分/天

  • 借入 1 美元 = 4 积分/天

每周重复 3 次。盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Kamino（借贷）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Meteora

您也可以使用 DLMM，但安全性较差。

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Cega

注意，流动性将锁仓 30 天。

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Asset Dash（钱包追踪）

  • 访问网站：https://linktr.ee/assetdash

  • 注册一个帐户

  • 打开“钱包”

  • 追踪几个钱包

  • 进行一些交易

  • 购买 NFT（可选）

Squads

  • 访问网站：https://squads.so/

  • 连接钱包

  • 创建你的 squad（填写所有内容）

  • 存入一些 SOL

  • 打开 Treasury - > 交易 - >使用 SOL 和 USDC

  • 成交量要达到 100 美元

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Vault Music

  • 下载手机应用

  • 创建一个帐户

  • 打开发现- >选择几个免费曲目

  • 打开 Fantasy - >选择 5 位作者

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

SOL super stake

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Circuit（质押）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Francium（借贷）

  • 访问网站：https://francium.io/app

  • 连接钱包

  • 打开“借出'->存入任一资金池

  • 打开“挖矿”- >存款

  • 打开“投票” - >投票

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Kanalabs（桥接）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Phoenix（DEX）

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Pyth（质押）

空投已经结束，但可以提高在其他空投中的机会。

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Mayan

盘点Solana生态36个潜力空投项目及交互策略

Tip Link

Пов'язані матеріали

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

"Rented Faith: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money?" Bitcoin ETF inflows are often seen as a barometer of institutional conviction. However, week-to-week analysis reveals they are primarily driven by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than directional bullishness. This is the cash-and-carry trade: buying the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in the price difference (basis). This delta-neutral activity registers as ETF inflows but reflects a rate-seeking, not price-betting, strategy. Data shows weekly ETF flow volatility is closely tied to hedge fund ("leveraged funds") short positions on CME futures, with a correlation of 0.70. About half of weekly flow variation can be explained by this single factor. In contrast, Bitcoin's weekly price changes have no statistically significant power to predict flows. Crucially, while this arbitrage trade dominates weekly *fluctuations*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the ~$55 billion total net inflow, the estimated net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The vast majority is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The "rented" arbitrage capital churns, while "owned" directional capital forms the bedrock. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund shorts peaking at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and falling to ~$4.5 billion. Recent outflows align with basis compression, signaling the trade's exit, not a loss of faith. For Ethereum ETFs, the same dynamic is weaker due to negative carry from forgone staking yield. The key takeaway: To interpret ETF flows, watch the basis vs. Treasury yields and CME hedge fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the weekly "demand" headline is driven by rented, rate-seeking capital versus real conviction.

链捕手6 хв тому

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

链捕手6 хв тому

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: HBM Prices Must Double Next Year, Memory Becomes a Burden for AI

Bernstein's report indicates that High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) prices must double (increase 2-2.5x) in 2027. This is because, while standard DRAM prices have surged approximately 4.5x, HBM prices remain locked in annual contracts, making standard DRAM significantly more profitable per wafer for memory makers (2x the revenue, nearly 3x the gross profit). To maintain capacity allocation for HBM, its price must rise sharply. A critical consequence is that HBM is sold packaged within Nvidia GPUs. To protect its 75% gross margin, Nvidia is likely to pass on HBM cost increases by raising GPU/system prices by about 4x the HBM cost hike. Combined with standard DRAM and NAND price increases, this could raise total AI capital expenditure for cloud providers by around 30%. The report maintains Outperform ratings on Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, significantly raising price targets due to expected upward earnings revisions. KIOXIA is the main loser, having no HBM exposure. MediaTek could benefit if cloud providers seek more ASIC-based alternatives to avoid Nvidia's markup. Valuations have shifted to a P/E basis, reflecting record-high profitability and cash generation expected in this cycle.

marsbit18 хв тому

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: HBM Prices Must Double Next Year, Memory Becomes a Burden for AI

marsbit18 хв тому

The 'Crisis Helmsman' of Financial Markets Passes Away: Reflecting on Greenspan's Federal Reserve Career

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, known as the 'crisis helmsman' of financial markets, has passed away at 100. His nearly 19-year tenure spanned four presidencies, from the 1987 stock market crash to the internet boom. Initially hailed as the 'Maestro' for his crisis management—famously intervening after Black Monday and during the LTCM collapse—his legacy became intertwined with the 2008 financial crisis. His market-friendly philosophy and the "Greenspan Put," an expectation of Fed support during downturns, were praised for fostering stability and growth in the 1990s but later criticized for encouraging excessive risk-taking and contributing to the housing bubble. Greenspan's career encapsulates the central debate of his era: whether markets can self-correct and if central banks should actively deflate asset bubbles. His passing reignites questions about the fine line between stabilizing markets and inadvertently sowing the seeds for the next crisis.

marsbit23 хв тому

The 'Crisis Helmsman' of Financial Markets Passes Away: Reflecting on Greenspan's Federal Reserve Career

marsbit23 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手28 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手28 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbit52 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbit52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片