一周代币解锁预告:SUI解锁超6000万美元,三个项目解锁占比超2%

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-03Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-03

Анотація

HFT、SUI、GAL 将有高比例解锁,但金额不高。

下周, 6 个项目迎来代币解锁事件。HFT、SUI、GAL 将有高比例解锁,但总体金额不大,其余项目解锁比例与金额均较小。

具体解锁详情如下:

一周代币解锁预告:SUI解锁超6000万美元,三个项目解锁占比超2%

Hashflow

项目推特:https://twitter.com/hashflow

项目官网:https://www.hashflow.com/

本次解锁数量: 1386 万枚

本次解锁金额:约 646 万美元

Hashflow 是一个去中心化的交易所,旨在实现零滑点和具备 MEV 保护的交易。Hashflow 目前可在以太坊、BNB Chain、Polygon、Avalanche、Arbitrum 和 Optimism 上使用。HFT 是 Hashflow 协议以及 Hashverse(Hashflow 的游戏化治理平台)的原生代币。

HFT 目前流通量达总量的 44% ,此前经历过一轮大额释放,目前月度释放 3% -4% 的代币,通胀速度中等。本轮将释放流通量的 3.9% ,主要为生态的 1.55% 、早期投资者的 1.45% 和核心团队的 0.67% 。今年内将保持相似的释放速度和对象。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:SUI解锁超6000万美元,三个项目解锁占比超2%

Sui

项目推特:https://twitter.com/SuiNetwork

项目官网:https://sui.io/

本次解锁数量: 4028 万枚

本次解锁金额:约 6526 万美元

Sui 是 Meta 系公链中起步最早的一个项目,由 Mysten Labs 团队开发。Sui 旨在创建一款环保、低成本、高吞吐量、低延迟的无权限区块链。相比传统区块链,Sui 最关键的创新在于 Sui 的数据模型及交易处理通道。

本轮解锁为常规线性解锁,全部面向社区项目(Community Access Program)解锁,一次性解锁 3462 万枚,价值 5608 万美元。后续的大额解锁将在五月末和六月末进行。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:SUI解锁超6000万美元,三个项目解锁占比超2%

Galxe

项目推特:https://twitter.com/Galxe

项目官网:https://galxe.com/

本次解锁数量: 203 万枚

本次解锁金额:约 706 万美元

Galxe 是一个Web3凭证数据网络。 Galxe 建立在开放和协作的基础架构之上,可帮助Web3开发人员和项目利用数字凭证数据和 NFT 来构建更好的产品和社区。

GAL 当前流通量已达总量的 53% ,常规解锁量影响不大,本次将释放流通量的 2.3% ,主要为基金会的 1.14% ,其余代币面向团队和社区释放,今年将整体保持微量通胀趋势。

具体释放曲线如下:

一周代币解锁预告:SUI解锁超6000万美元,三个项目解锁占比超2%

Пов'язані матеріали

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit41 хв тому

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit41 хв тому

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbit56 хв тому

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbit56 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片