主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-01Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-01

Анотація

“更新积分规则,迁移主网成本高”遭群嘲。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Asher

主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

Blast 主网上线:更新积分规则,迁移主网成本高

火爆的链上数据

3 月 1 日,基于 Optimistic Rollup 的 Layer2 网络 Blast 正式上线主网,一时间链上活动活跃。根据 Flipside 平台的数据面板,截止到目前,Blast 网络中共有 3.7 万个钱包执行近 81 万笔交易,平均每秒创建 0.5 个区块,平均 Gas 费为 0.000394 ETH(按当前价格计算约为 1.33 美元),平均 TPS 为 1.8,峰值 TPS 为 144.5。

主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

图源:flipsidecrypto

公布新积分规则

参与 Blast 测试网的用户最为关心的是继续参与主网交互的奖励部分。目前 Blast 允许早期访问用户跨链到主网并使用 Blast 原生 DApp。

具体规则为:主网用户将继续赚取 Blast 积分,主网 DApp 现能够赚取 BlastGold(Blast 金币)。Blast 空投的 50% 分配给 Blast 积分(用户), 50% 分配给 Blast 金币(DApp)。金币将每两周分发给 DApp。Dapp 可以为自己保留金币,但部分 DApp 已经承诺将所有金币给用户。

Odaily星球日报在此提示,Blast 生态项目鱼龙混杂,决定参与前请 DYOR,谨防风险。

主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

图源:官推

根据社区多名成员反馈,从测试网映射到 Blast 主网的积分出现严重 BUG,有些地址的积分显示并没有按照官方说的 10 倍积分,而是一个 0-10 倍的随机数,甚至有用户拿到了 0 积分。对此,官方在官推中第一时间出了公告:承认积分的计算出现问题,目前正在修复中,所有受影响用户的积分将被追溯纠正。

主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

图源:官推

昂贵的迁移成本

由于新的积分规则中有说明,迁移到 Blast 主网之后,每个小时都会增加积分,并且默认增加速度为 1 倍,最高增加速度为 12 倍,因此很多用户准备将 ETH 第一时间迁移到 Blast 主网,但本次手动迁移的 Gas 成本基本在 35-80 美元之间,一时间很多散户与多号用户怨声载道,抱怨迁移成本过高。图为社区用户在 Gwei 为 37 时的迁移的数据记录,成本为 37.55 美元。

主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

迁移成本

同时,有社区反馈,即便不想参与 Blast 主网的交互,也需要将 ETH 迁移到 Blast 主网之后才能提现到以太坊一层。目前,通过官方桥进行提现需要 14 天的等待时间,如下图。Odaily星球日报提醒用户,目前其他第三方跨链桥提现存在不确定性的风险,注意资金安全。

主网版Blast的“念与怨”:下个“大毛”还是持续PUA用户?

14 天等待期

热度很高,但质疑声不断

虽然 Blast 主网上线的几小时有着超高的链上热度、社区热度,但社交媒体上弥漫 KOL 和普通参与者的怨气:

  • “Blast 最傻 X 的地方是当时存进去 ETH 的 Gas 就不便宜,现在上了主网还要花钱跨。”

  • “Blast 跨到主网,Gas 比存进去的时候还高,请问是我的操作问题?”

  • “主网上线完全可以按照之前跨链映射,为什么要让全网 20 多万的用户再烧一次手续费呢?不是所有人都是巨鲸,不在乎这点手续费的。难道 Blast 不需要散户吗?”

  • “Blast 上还没有项目方官方支持的项目,全是土狗盘子群友创业,参与的还都是 ETH 链上的‘大割’,都是链上经验丰富,散户跑不快就等着被埋。”

  • “Blast 链就跟当年 BSC 链一样,一堆跑路项目,据说这段时间,铁顺天天跟中国项目方开会。”

  • “Blast 感觉‘含国量’太高了,上面的项目纯 PVP 博弈,晚跑一秒就不用跑了。”

……

综述

回顾 Blast 主网上线这半天,无论是大量新开盘的链上土狗项目迅速跑路,还是公布的新积分计划,再到主网迁移昂贵的 Gas 费,整个过程中用户的怨气不断积累。

若 Blast 主网上线后不能培育出一批优质项目,或从官方角度为用户谋些福利(不说增加积分系数,哪怕省点 gas),那么 Blast 的热度会逐渐被不良的体验浇灭。

毕竟,决定坚守在此的参与者还都瞄着下个重要时间节点(5 月)。在此之前,是继续通过积分 PUA 用户还是会短期来一次“空投盛宴”,Blast 可以多做考虑。

Пов'язані матеріали

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

On June 22nd, driven by rising stock prices, SK Hynix’s market capitalization reached $1.35 trillion, surpassing Bitcoin's total market cap of approximately $1.29 trillion. This temporarily made it South Korea's highest-valued company. The core driver of this surge is HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), for which SK Hynix is the primary supplier to NVIDIA, holding over 60% market share. AI's demand for high memory bandwidth has translated into immense profitability, with SK Hynix reporting a 72% operating profit margin in Q1. The company's success follows a 13-year bet on HBM technology, beginning in 2009. It nearly failed after the 2001 dot-com bubble, was acquired by SK Group in 2012, and was subsequently recapitalized to continue its long-term HBM development. The article contrasts this with the Crypto AI narrative. Capital currently favors AI infrastructure players like SK Hynix due to "real orders, physical barriers, and quantifiable profit margins." In comparison, Crypto AI projects, promising decentralized compute and data markets, remain largely conceptual with limited tangible progress. Examples include Bittensor, whose core mechanisms are still under development, and Bitcoin miners transitioning to AI, who face significant funding gaps and execution challenges. The piece cites analysis suggesting the AI sector has absorbed nearly all new market liquidity since 2022, leaving little for crypto. It concludes that the current AI infrastructure红利 is captured by entities with proven technical barriers and supply capabilities, while crypto networks still need to define their concrete role in the value chain.

链捕手34 хв тому

A Company Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy Just Surpassed Bitcoin in Market Cap

链捕手34 хв тому

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

Bittensor, a decentralized AI protocol, is accelerating its transition to full decentralization over the next 18 months, as outlined in a recent post by co-founder Const. The project currently operates in a "semi-decentralized" state: ownership and network participation are open and permissionless, with TAO distribution based on competitive contribution. However, protocol upgrades and governance have remained under core team control to enable rapid iteration in the fast-evolving AI sector. This strategic shift comes as the ecosystem matures, boasting 128 subnets and a large community. Const argues that continued centralization now poses risks, including single points of failure and regulatory scrutiny. The upcoming decentralization roadmap includes optimizing validator competition, opening liquidity pools, introducing governance rights for Alpha holders, and refining economic models. The move could fundamentally reshape TAO's value proposition, adding governance premiums to its existing valuation based on AI narrative and scarcity. It also signals a potential maturation of the AI crypto sector, where competition may shift from hype to sustainable protocol design and real economic activity. Bittensor positions itself not just as another AI token, but as foundational infrastructure aiming to decentralize intelligence production—analogous to Bitcoin's role in decentralizing money—with the goal of creating a resilient "Millennium Intelligence Federation."

marsbit47 хв тому

Bittensor Moves Towards Ultimate Decentralization: The Critical 18 Months for the TAO Ecosystem is Here?

marsbit47 хв тому

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

In June 2026, Sakana AI's new model Fugu caused a stir in the AI community. Its Fugu Ultra variant achieved scores of 73.7 on SWE-Bench Pro and 82.1 on TerminalBench 2.1, surpassing GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8, and was claimed to be comparable to export-restricted models like Fable 5 and Mythos Preview. Remarkably, the core of this high-performance system is not a massive model, but a small 7B-parameter RL Conductor model. Fugu operates as a multi-agent orchestrator: the 7B model acts as a "foreman," dynamically analyzing user tasks and delegating subtasks to a pool of top-tier global models (e.g., GPT-5, Gemini 3.1 Pro). It then synthesizes and verifies their outputs. This architecture represents a paradigm shift from monolithic models to an expert-team approach. It enhances performance in complex, multi-step engineering tasks like code review and security testing by enabling cross-validation from specialized models, improving long-session stability and token efficiency. However, Fugu's strengths come with trade-offs: it faces inherent latency due to multiple API calls, relies heavily on underlying US model APIs (creating dependency risks), and its benchmark comparisons with Fable/Mythos are based on reported scores, not head-to-head testing. For Japan's AI ecosystem, which lacks the massive compute and data resources of the US or China, Fugu exemplifies an "asymmetric breakthrough" strategy. Instead of competing directly in parameter scale, it focuses on intelligent orchestration of existing global models, offering a degree of AI sovereignty and resilience. While a significant system-level innovation, its ultimate capability is still bounded by the underlying models it coordinates.

marsbit47 хв тому

Japan's AI Dark Horse Emerges: How a 7B Small Model Challenges Fable and Mythos?

marsbit47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片