Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-03-01Востаннє оновлено о 2024-03-01

Анотація

「基于比特币区块数据的生成艺术」

过去的一周,在比较不被人注意到的角落,有一个比特币生态的小图片项目在没有正式上架任何比特币 NFT 交易市场的情况下狂涨了 10 倍,目前 OTC 地板价来到了 0.08 比特币,这就是 Natcats。

Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

Natcats

几天前,Natcats 829999 以 1.3 比特币的价格成交,成为目前单个成交价格最高的 Natcat。

Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

而就在昨天,两个 DMT 概念的小图片项目 NATTRIBUTES 和 Natdogs 在 Magic Eden 上架后,都立马跻身成交量日榜。NATTRIBUTES 单日成交超过 11 比特币,Natdogs 单日成交超过 5 比特币。

什么是 DMT 概念小图片呢?

DMT 理论

大家熟知的 Bitmap 就是 DMT 理论的应用。这个理论看文档是挺晦涩的,简而言之,比特币区块链中有很多种类的数据,比如区块哈希值、区块大小、区块高度、区块目标难度等等。基于这些数据来创造特定的数字资产,是 DMT 理论希望实现的目的。

Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

每个人会如何利用比特币区块链的数据来创造特定的数字资产?这个挖掘比特币区块链数据价值的过程,就像在自然界中发现化学元素。同种数据类型下可以注册多种「元素」,但元素不可以重名,相当于同种类型的数据可以有多种使用方法。

第一个被注册且命名的「元素」是 DMT,该「元素」利用的是比特币的区块目标难度数据,而 Natcats、NATTRIBUTES 和 Natdogs 都使用了该「元素」,即利用比特币的区块目标难度数据来创造小图片。那么 Natcats 具体又是如何使用该「元素」的呢?

Natcats 的创造过程

首先,你看到的 DMT 小图片都是代码渲染后的结果。现在您如果到 Magic Eden 上查看 NATTRIBUTES 和 Natdogs 的合集,会发现是这样的:

Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

这是因为 Magic Eden 在前端还没有支持 DMT 小图片渲染。和「递归铭文」有些相似,现在你看到的大部分比特币小图片实际上都是层层指针调用内容、根据代码渲染后的结果。

Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

上图从左到右分别是渲染 Natcats 图像的渲染代码(以 JavaScript 形式刻录到了链上)、Natcats 部署铭文以及 Natcats 铸造铭文。铸造铭文中的「dep」字段指向部署铭文,而部署铭文中的「id」字段又指向了包含图像渲染代码的链上铭文。

您可以这么理解:根据链上的数据指向,Natcats 是根据特定的脚本来生成图像的,但是需要做额外的工作把代码运行的结果展现出来,毕竟比特币自己是不会做这个事情的。我们通常把这个过程叫作「索引」,比如将 BRC-20 的余额展现在您的眼前,就需要「索引器」的工作,再把正确的结果显示到您的浏览界面。

现在来解释 Natcats 是如何利用比特币的区块目标难度数据来创造小图片。和 Bitmap 相似,一个 Natcats 对应一个区块,但是 Natcats 在区块数据的要求上做了限制条件——只有比特币的区块目标难度数据(16 进制字段)中包含了「 3 b」,该区块铸造出的 Natcats 才会被认作是有效的。

比特币的区块目标难度数据每 2016 个区块调整一次(大概 2 周),而出现「 3 b」,目前在比特币历史上只有 4 次,每次 2016 个区块,所以目前 Natcats 的总供应量就是 2016* 4 = 8064 个。至于以后还会不会出现这样的区块,尚未可知,可能以后还会出现新的「 3 b」区块,那就会有新的 Natcats 可供铸造。

Natcats一周十倍,DMT概念小图片究竟是什么?

以上只是决定了 Natcats 是否可以「诞生」,而决定 Natcats 的「基因」(即 Natcats 长什么样),是根据其生成区块的区块高度来决定的。比如,您「占领」了区块高度为 123008 的「 3 b」区块(即使用该区块来铸造一只 Natcat),因为该区块高度包含了「 00 」,那么这只 Natcat 就会有耳环。

特征的生成规则细讲下去比较复杂,比如耳环的颜色又根据区块高度第 3 位数字的不同而有变化,但都是这样的思路。也因此,有一些特征在现在还没有被生成出来,比如区块高度中包含「 00000 」的 Natcat 会有一个外星人皇冠。总之,因为「 3 b」区块啥时候出现不可预测,其区块高度也就不可预测,从系列供应量到特征稀有性都存在着未知。因此 Natcats 也被称为是「基于比特币区块数据的生成艺术」。

NATTRIBUTES 和 Natdogs 的逻辑总体上和 Natcats 也是一样的,只是在具体的规则上有不同,这里就不再赘述了。

结语

最后再提醒大家一次,Natcats 截止目前还没有正式上架任何比特币 NFT 交易市场。Ordinals Wallet 上虽然有合集,但很明显是不完整的,现在大部分交易都在其官方 Discord 以 OTC 形式进行。

而 NATTRIBUTES 和 Natdogs 在 Magic Eden 上已经被 FOMO 过了。投资有风险,大家需要万分谨慎。

Пов'язані матеріали

Idle Macs Can Also Make Money? An Overview of Eigen Labs' Decentralized AI Inference Network Darkbloom

AI inference is becoming a crucial layer of internet infrastructure, yet it remains largely dependent on costly, capacity-limited centralized systems with potential security risks. Meanwhile, millions of powerful computers sit idle globally. Eigen Labs' Darkbloom network aims to utilize this idle capacity by enabling distributed AI inference on Mac computers, specifically those with Apple Silicon chips. Darkbloom's architecture consists of three components: users who send inference requests, a coordinator (operated by Eigen Labs) that routes these requests, and providers (Mac owners) whose machines run the models and return outputs without being able to see the request content. The system prioritizes privacy through a hardened provider process, software integrity checks, and hardware-supported attestation based on Apple's security architecture to ensure verifiable privacy. Economically, Darkbloom differs from traditional models. It leverages existing hardware, with marginal costs primarily driven by electricity, allowing it to offer pricing roughly 50% lower than major API aggregators. Providers keep 100% of the inference revenue, and the project does not rely on token subsidies; earnings come solely from real AI inference demand. However, early-stage earnings are modest, with top providers currently earning under $6 per day, influenced by factors like hardware specs, uptime, and network demand. The network currently supports models like Google's Gemma 4 and OpenAI's GPT-OSS via OpenRouter. To participate as a provider, users need an Apple Silicon Mac running macOS 14 or later, must install the Darkbloom provider software, and keep the machine online with a stable internet connection.

marsbit11 хв тому

Idle Macs Can Also Make Money? An Overview of Eigen Labs' Decentralized AI Inference Network Darkbloom

marsbit11 хв тому

Which Crypto Sectors Have Been "Eaten" by AI Agents?

The article examines which crypto sectors have been increasingly dominated by AI Agents and which remain human-centric. In certain high-speed, efficiency-driven areas, AI Agents have taken clear control. This includes derivatives/perpetuals trading, where bots outperform humans significantly (e.g., a contest showed 0% of AI Agents were liquidated vs. 43% of humans), arbitrage/MEV extraction, and yield optimization (with ~68% of new DeFi protocols in Q1 2026 featuring autonomous AI Agents). Spot trading and portfolio optimization are also seeing heavy Agent adoption. However, the shift is not universal. In "battleground" sectors, both Agents and humans coexist. In prediction markets, Agents dominate short-term arbitrage, but humans still outperform in long-term, nuanced judgment calls. In DeFi lending, while liquidation is automated, core deposit/borrow decisions remain largely human-driven. Sectors still firmly led by human activity include stablecoin payments and card-based spending (driven by real-world economic activity and remittances) and wallets, which serve as the crucial human-verification and approval layer. The rise of Agents increases the need for robust human-Agent verification layers. Projects like World/AgentKit, t54, Self Protocol, and Kite AI are building infrastructure to create trust, security, and accountability by binding Agents to verified human identities. In conclusion, while AI Agents have decisively "eaten" speed and optimization-focused crypto sectors, human judgment, trust, and real-world context remain dominant in areas that create broad economic value, such as payments and identity. The future likely involves a symbiotic relationship where Agents require human verification and oversight to operate effectively.

Foresight News17 хв тому

Which Crypto Sectors Have Been "Eaten" by AI Agents?

Foresight News17 хв тому

After Rising 11 Times in a Year, Micron's Earnings Report Becomes a Stress Test for the AI Memory Market

**Micron's Upcoming Earnings: A Crucial Test for the AI Memory Rally** Investors in AI memory stocks face a critical moment on June 24th, when Micron Technology reports quarterly earnings. The stock, having surged approximately 11-fold from $103 to $1,134 over the past year, carries immense market expectations. Wall Street consensus forecasts a staggering ~932% year-over-year jump in EPS to around $19.72 and ~270% revenue growth to ~$345 billion, largely driven by sold-out HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) capacity through 2026. Analysts have aggressively revised estimates upward over the last 90 days, with EPS expectations rising 68%. This creates a high bar: even strong results risk a sell-off if they fail to meet these elevated projections. Notably, price forecasts from institutions like Citi (predicting ~200% DRAM price increases in 2026) are already among the most bullish on Wall Street, not conservative. The key metric to watch is gross margin, guided to a record ~81%. Such peak profitability raises questions about sustainability in the historically cyclical memory sector. While management has signaled continued strength, the stock's direction post-earnings will likely hinge more on forward guidance for the next quarter and details on HBM capacity expansion for 2027, rather than the already-anticipated stellar past results. The report represents a major pressure test for the high-flying AI memory trade.

marsbit21 хв тому

After Rising 11 Times in a Year, Micron's Earnings Report Becomes a Stress Test for the AI Memory Market

marsbit21 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片