Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-02-29Востаннє оновлено о 2024-02-29

Анотація

L2 生态系统仍然充满活力,交易数量逼近历史新高。

原文作者:Zack Pokorny,Galaxy

原文编译:邓通,金色财经

现在距离 2024 开年已经过去 50 天了,我们看到链上代币化 RWA 的市值创下历史新高,一些主要 L1 和 L2 参与 DeFi 的地址数量创下两年新高,以太坊的 L2 生态系统始终保持活力。 本报告通过链上数据的视角重点介绍了行业中正在出现的一些主要趋势。

  • RWA 代币总市值于 2 月 2 日创下约 27, 740 亿美元的历史新高,代币化金融资产(即国债和债券、私人信贷和房地产)市场于 2 月 8 日创下 16, 140 亿美元的新高。随着 RWA 代币市值达到这一里程碑,加密原生资产正在 DeFi 关键领域相对于 RWA 获得市场份额。

  • 主要 L1 和 L2 中与 DeFi 交互的地址数量接近两年高点,达到 445, 000 个地址。 Dex 是用户首次使用 DeFi 时最常见的 DeFi 应用类型之一。

  • 在以太坊生态系统(L1 和主要 L2)中,每日活跃地址数量已达到历史新高,每日交易数量继续推高。 L2 收入在上个月也出现了大幅增长。

RWA

2024 年 2 月 2 日,代币化现实世界资产的市值创下历史新高,达到 27, 740 亿美元。值得注意的是,包括国债和其他债券、私人信贷和房地产在内的金融资产在 2024 年 2 月 8 日创下了 16.14 亿美元的历史新高。请注意,这些数值仅考虑公共区块链上 RWA 代币本身的价值,例如 Ondo 的 OUSG 和 Tether 的 XAUT,不包括稳定币或发行者代币,例如 ONDO 和 CFG。 金融资产 RWA 国库券 / 债券的主导地位为 58.1% ,较截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日的历史高点下降约 110 个基点。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

尽管 RWA 代币的链上代币市值再创新高,但 RWA 在链上产品中的主导地位和使用量一直在下降。 这在 DAI 的抵押中最为明显,自 2023 年 10 月下旬以来,RWA 的使用一直在稳步下降。这是一个关键迹象,突显出人们越来越倾向于使用加密原生资产而不是链上的 RWA,并且反过来,对加密货币的需求也普遍增加。 最近 LST 支持的稳定币的增长只会增加这一概念,并表明趋势很强劲。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

此外,加密原生资产的生产力在几个方面已经超过了 RWA。 我们在 12 月 1 日的时事通讯中以 Maker 和 DAI 为例介绍了这一点,其中加密货币支持的贷款比 RWA 获得了更高的稳定费。 随着 MakerDAO 投票增加其一些链上金库的稳定费,这种动态仍然存在,并且再次增长。 最值得注意的是,它将通过其 stETH 金库铸造 DAI 的费用提高了 191 个基点。 它也存在于主要稳定币相对于国库券收益率的供应年化收益率中。 下图采用了 Aave v2/v3 和 Compound v2/v3 中 USDT、USDC、DAI 和 FRAX 借入金额的加权平均供应 APY。 自 2023 年 10 月下旬 /2023 年 11 月初(就在 DAI RWA 抵押品开始下跌之前)以来,稳定币收益率一直超过 3 个月期国库券的收益率。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

DeFi 用户和保留

根据 7 天 SMA 数据, 2 月 1 日,主要 L1 和 L2 中使用 DeFi 的每日活跃地址(DAA)数量创下了 2 年新高,达到 57.6 万个地址。 Solana 一直保持着每日最活跃的 DeFi 地址,在 2024 年 2 月 1 日(Jupiter 空投后的第二天)达到 33 万的高点后,截至 2024 年 2 月 20 日达到 19.6 万。 另一方面,以太坊在过去一年中 DeFi 用户不断流失(较 2023 年 2 月 20 日的 12 万个地址下降了 24% )。 下一节将介绍有关以太坊活动和用户数量的更多信息。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

Dexe 已成为用户在上述七条链上加入 DeFi 的关键组成部分。 作为参考,在下图中,金融应用程序类别包括借贷平台和收益聚合器等应用程序。 自 2023 年 9 月以来,在这 7 个链上参与 DeFi 的所有新用户中,近 60% 都是从 DEX 开始的。这与过去六个多月围绕 DeFi 的空投和投机浪潮一致。 另外,请注意过去三个月 NFT 在吸引新用户进入 DeFi 方面的重要性日益突出。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

在截至 1 月份的三个月内,DEX 用户的保留率明显强劲。 在过去五个月观察到的链中,Solana 的 DEX 用户保留率最高,这可以归功于 Jupiter 的空投活动。 下图跟踪了 Solana、Arbitrum 和 Optimism(上述链中 DEX 留存率排名前三的链)中 DEX 用户的月留存率(在 x 月加入并在 x + 1 月仍在交易的用户留存率)多于。 这些用户的月度留存率在 2024 年 1 月下降之前,已连续四个月呈上升趋势(Solana 为 6 个月)。加权平均留存率基于每月新增 DEX 用户。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

以太坊与 Layer 2 

以太坊因用户数量和加密推特上的总体活动下降而受到批评。 虽然每日活跃地址数量和活动指标(如交易数量)在过去两年的大部分时间里确实持平甚至略有下降,但对以 rollup 为中心的未来的承诺使得仅通过 L1 来衡量以太坊是不公平的。 当考虑到一些顶级 L2 时,用户增长和活动正逼近历史最高水平。

下图显示了以太坊 L1 及其一些领先的 L2 的全网络每日活跃地址的总和。 截至 2 月 21 日,这些网络日活跃地址总数超过 120 万个,其中以太坊 L1 仅占用 36 万个地址。 请注意,此图表仅包含所有以太坊 L2 的一部分。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

以太坊和相同 L2 上的交易计数显示出相似的高点。 尽管以太坊 L1 交易低迷,但在截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日的 30 天内,其 L2 生态系统平均每天有 314 万笔交易。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

与强劲的交易数量相一致的是收入的增长。 截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日,Arbitrum、Optimism、Base、Scroll、Zora 和 zkSync 使用 7 天 SMA 每天产生 150 万美元的收入(这些是用户向汇总排序器支付的费用)。 2024 年 2 月 26 日也创下了观察到的连锁店每日综合收入第二高的日期。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

在截至 2024 年 2 月 26 日的 30 天内,这些 L2 还向以太坊 L1 支付了超过 2160 万美元的数据成本。这个数字将变得越来越重要,因为以前在以太坊 L1 上执行的活动是在 rollup 上进行的。

Galaxy:10张图解读RWA、DeFi和以太坊生态的活力

总结

以下是上述数据提供的一些关键信号:

  • DeFi 中对加密原生资产取代 RWA 的需求持续存在。

  • 尽管大规模空投已经结束,用户仍继续涌向 DeFi,但 1 月份 DEX 的保留率有所下降。 这表明 DeFi 这一领域的用户出现了一些流失或投降。

  • 尽管人们注意到以太坊的活动和用户数量有所下降,但其 L2 生态系统仍然充满活力,交易数量逼近历史新高。

Пов'язані матеріали

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbit11 хв тому

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbit11 хв тому

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

Citi analyst Tyler Radke's team attended the AWS New York Summit (June 17-18), engaging with over 10 clients and partners. In a June 19 report, they highlighted the summit's focus on scaling agent AI for enterprise deployment. Citi maintains a "Buy" rating on Amazon, forecasting AWS revenue growth to accelerate to 37% in FY27 from 30% in FY26, noting this estimate may be conservative. Key takeaways: 1. **AWS Strategy Shift:** AWS is moving from proof-of-concepts to scalable deployment. New offerings like AWS Context (building enterprise knowledge graphs), Amazon Quick (cross-application AI assistant), and security tool Continuum address core enterprise pain points for AI adoption. 2. **Data Infrastructure Beneficiaries:** Data infrastructure companies like Snowflake, Elastic, Oracle, and ClickHouse are seen as direct beneficiaries of scaling AI workloads, as evidenced by strong growth and use cases presented. 3. **Critical Role of Data Governance:** As AI agents scale from hundreds to thousands, effective data governance becomes the key variable for deploying AI in core business processes. AWS Context represents AWS's strategic extension from providing compute/models to offering a data governance infrastructure layer. The report emphasizes that without solving data governance, AI will remain confined to pilot projects. The investment thesis focuses on AWS revenue acceleration and data infrastructure vendors' growth, while monitoring signals like AWS's quarterly revenue growth, Bedrock AgentCore task volume, and pricing impacts on companies like Elastic.

marsbit17 хв тому

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

marsbit17 хв тому

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

**Market Enters Critical Week: Bitcoin Pullback Test and HYPE Support Battle** The market enters a crucial phase of contention this week. The marginal shifts in Federal Reserve policy expectations continue to dictate the pricing rhythm for risk assets. Meanwhile, in the crypto market, following a period of sideways consolidation, the divergence between bulls and bears is becoming concentrated at key price levels. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** The 4-hour chart suggests BTC is in a five-wave structure since the June 5th low near $59,100. Price action shows a short-term rising channel. The recent drop below this channel's lower boundary is now being followed by a pullback attempt (wave 40-41). The outcome of this retest is critical. * **This Week's Outlook:** The core focus is whether BTC can reclaim and hold above the channel's lower boundary. * **Bullish Scenario:** A successful hold could lead to a continued rebound, potentially challenging the $69,500 - $70,500 resistance zone. * **Bearish Scenario:** Failure to hold may trigger a renewed test of the $59,000 - $60,000 core support area, with $55,000 as a deeper support level. * **Operational Strategy:** The author maintains a 20% mid-term short position initiated last week near $64,500, based on a model signaling a shift to a bearish structure. Short-term tactics involve using 30% capital for potential "spread" trades, with three contingency plans (A, B, C) outlined for reacting to resistance tests, breakouts, or support breakdowns. **HYPE Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** On the 4-hour chart, HYPE shows strong momentum, having recently broken to a new high since January. The current pullback presents a clear three-wave correction structure, bringing the price back to the critical $64 - $66 support zone. * **This Week's Outlook:** The focus is on the battle for the $64 - $66 support area. * **Bullish Scenario:** Holding this support could signal a continuation of the uptrend from the June 10th low, leading to new highs. * **Bearish Scenario:** A breakdown could extend the correction, potentially testing the deeper $52 - $54 support band. * **Operational Strategy:** The recommended short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A light long position (under 30% capital) could be considered if HYPE shows stabilization signals at the $64-$66 or $52-$54 support zones, confirmed by model signals. Strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **General Risk Management:** A strict trailing stop-loss protocol is advised: set an initial stop; move to breakeven at +1% profit; lock in profits progressively thereafter. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as the author's personal technical perspective and trading log, not as investment advice. Markets are complex and dynamic; risk control is paramount.*

Odaily星球日报18 хв тому

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

Odaily星球日报18 хв тому

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

The article discusses ERC-8126, a proposed standard designed to address the lack of trust and verification for AI Agents operating on-chain. While ERC-8004 provides AI Agents with a basic on-chain identity (answering "Who are you?"), it does not guarantee trustworthiness. ERC-8126 aims to fill this gap by establishing a verification layer (answering "Are you reliable?"). It standardizes how independent verification providers can assess an agent's associated risks across five key areas: Token/Contract Verification (ETV), Media Content Verification (MCV), Solidity Code Verification (SCV), Web Application Verification (WAV), and Wallet Verification (WV). These providers generate a standardized risk score (0-100) and proofs based on their checks, without acting as a single authoritative certifier. This allows wallets, marketplaces, dApps, and other agents to consume these risk signals—for example, to display warnings, filter listings, or make interaction decisions. The standard also incorporates concepts like Private Data Verification (PDV) and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) to allow verification without exposing sensitive underlying data. Positioned alongside ERC-8004 (Identity) and ERC-8183 (Commerce for agents), ERC-8126 represents a step toward building a verifiable and accountable infrastructure for the emerging on-chain AI Agent economy, shifting trust assessment from purely user-based judgment to standardized, consumable signals.

marsbit35 хв тому

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

marsbit35 хв тому

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

Borrowed Belief: How much of Bitcoin ETF flows are real money? Weekly Bitcoin ETF flows, often interpreted as a measure of institutional conviction, are heavily influenced by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than genuine directional buying. A cash-and-carry arbitrage, where traders buy the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in a basis spread (the price difference between futures and spot), drives roughly half of the week-to-week flow volatility. This delta-neutral activity appears as ETF inflows but is unrelated to price views. Data shows a strong correlation (0.70) between weekly ETF inflows and increases in hedge fund short positions on CME futures, while Bitcoin’s weekly price returns have almost no explanatory power. However, this arbitrage activity dominates short-term *fluctuations*, not the cumulative *stock* of investments. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows since launch, only about $1 billion currently represents net arbitrage exposure. The vast majority consists of steady, directional buying averaging around $400 million per week. The arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund short positions peaking near $14 billion in late 2024 and declining to ~$4.5 billion. Recent ETF outflows partly reflect this ongoing unwind as the basis compresses, not a loss of faith in Bitcoin. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The headline number is more a gauge of arbitrage desk activity than conviction. For accurate interpretation, monitor the CME basis relative to Treasury yields and hedge fund net shorts—these reveal how much of the reported “demand” is truly directional.

marsbit38 хв тому

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

marsbit38 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片