提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-02-28Востаннє оновлено о 2024-02-28

Анотація

Aevo 、Hyperliquid 和 Whales Market 等协议为用户提供了另一种押注空投的方法。

原文作者:THOR、HYPHIN

原文编译:Luffy,Foresight News

投机是加密货币市场的命脉,精明的机会主义者常常能找到新方法来押注资产。在大多数情况下,人们投资于已经存在的东西,因为有一些数据可以让人们做出明智的决定。然而,最近的市场趋势表明,空投分配和未释放资产的交易量有所增加。

介绍

盘前市场(pre-market)交易兴趣的激增很大程度上归因于无数的空投活动和备受期待的项目,这些项目希望利用繁荣的市场和积极的情绪将其代币推上公开市场。

随着新叙事的所有必要催化剂就位,Aevo、Hyperliquid 和 Whales Market 等协议已经着手抓住了这个机会。这些平台为尚未发行的代币提供永续期货。

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

Aevo、Whales Market 和 Hyperliquid 的 pre-market 交易量

请记住,这些工具波动性极大,应谨慎使用,因为它们流动性值得怀疑,并且确定其基础资产的公允价值非常困难。

鉴于刚才提到的金融产品的高度投机性和风险性,它们对交易者有什么价值和机会呢?我们将在本文中通过分析市场数据来尝试找出答案。

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

Aevo 的 Pre-launch 市场

历史表现

借助交易所 API 和历史数据,我们可以观察所有曾经在 pre-market 交易的资产的价格表现,并了解它们在正式上线后的表现。

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

一些协议启动前和启动后资产价格比较

大多数此类资产的共同模式是上市后交易量相对较低,并且随着发布日期的临近,波动性和交易量达到峰值,之后活动开始减少。

客观地说,表中每项资产最初的挂牌价格都不是其价格峰值。空投代币在过去 6 个月中表现异常出色,尽管人们普遍认为空投代币一旦可交易,就会对价格产生巨大影响。

然而,这并不意味着人们应该在资产在 pre-market 上市后立即买入。价格变动可能导致仓位被清算,而且由于上市标准未知,收益并不能得到保证。

就交易量而言,很明显,受到追捧的资产,而不是仅仅因为其激励措施而在 Twitter 上流传的资产,比其他即将推出的代币获得了更多的关注,其中大多数代币的日交易量都无法超过 10 万美元。

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

JUP 在不同 pre-market 中交易量占比

就 Jupiter 而言,在 Solana 扩张期间被炒作了一段时间后,他们通过吸收庞大的流动性而出尽风头。

当前的 pre-launch 市场

回顾了历史数据,让我们看看当前的机会。截至今天,有大量未发行的代币可在 Aevo 和 Hyperliquid 上进行交易。

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

目前 Aevo 和 Hyperliquid 上活跃的发行前资产

除了刚刚上市的 Parcel 和 Portal 之外,没有太多活跃的交易发生。从价格表现看,大多数代币都表现良好,少数代币在几个月的时间里上涨数倍。

让我们从列表中选择一些有趣的项目,看看是否可以确定它们的估值是否与类似协议具有可比性:

Wormhole (W) 

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

Wormhole 的 FDV 由 Hyperliquid 的 W/USD 标记价格乘以代币总供应量 (100 亿)得出

与市场上的替代性解决方案相比,Wormhole 目前的理论估值可能被夸大了。除非公布突破性的进展,否则在代币生成活动结束后,代币价格可能会走低,因为成交量反映的投资者兴趣处于低点。

BLAST

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

Blast 的 FDV 由 Aevo 的 BLAST-USD 标记价格乘以总供应量(10 亿)得出

尽管投机性使得 FDV 随时可能发生数十亿美元的变化,但 TVL 指标表明人们对 Blast 生态系统表现出明显的兴趣(很可能是由于空投预期)。

从 L2 的定价方式来看,Blast 目前在纸面上似乎被低估了,但在试图得出明确的结论时需要考虑更多信息。不幸的是,除了 TVL 之外,关于其链上现状的信息很少,这使得评估过程变得困难。

积分交易

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

Whales Market 积分交易

积分现在可以在去中心化的场外交易平台 Whales Market 上进行交易。

「 2024 年将是空投的『黄金年』」- @CC 2 Ventures 

加密领域最多产的空投农民之一表示,成为一名空投农民可能从未像现在这样有利可图。宣布积分计划的协议数量之多,已经使我们达到了用户交互货币化的地步,如果你想作为一个项目获得关注,激励措施是必须的。

这些积分的交易市场出现是很自然的。这样的渠道可以让空投农民提前变现他们的收获。

迄今为止,Whales Market 已经促成了价值 630 万美元的点对点积分交易,并且随着越来越多的报价上市,它处于进一步增长之中。

目前有 9 个协议可以在平台上进行积分交易:Parcl、Kamino、Ethena、Magic Eden、Hyperliquid、EigenLayer、friend.tech 和 ether.fi 。在不久的将来,Marginfi、Drift 和 Blast 应该也会上线。

以下是目前最流行的积分交易的概述:

提前押注热门项目,盘点pre-launch协议现状

观察平均订单价格和订单价格中位数,很明显,在某些情况下,价格分布并不集中。

到目前为止,其中一些积分的公允的价值看似已经确定,但是积分的价值究竟意味着什么?

一个积分的价格可能会暗示市场预期即将推出的协议目前的估值是多少。随着越来越多的积分被发行,它们的价格可能会由于奖励稀释而下降,除非市场情绪发生变化并且预期估值上升。

让我们以 EigenLayer 为例来检验这个想法。

每积分价格 = 0.155 积分总量 = 1, 963, 113, 523 空投价值 = 每积分价格 * 积分总量 = 304, 282, 596 
(理论)空投分配= 0.1 (10% )完全稀释价值=空投价值 / 空投分配= 3, 042, 825, 960 

由于快照日期通常被严格保密,因此我们无法确定最终总共会产生多少积分。

结论

通过历史观察并考虑到频繁的交易模式,在看涨趋势下,这些 pre-market 资产即使在上线后也继续表现良好,高峰通常在代币发布之日。Aevo、Hyperliquid 和 Whales Market 协议为用户提供了另一种押注空投的方法。

Пов'язані матеріали

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbit6 хв тому

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbit6 хв тому

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

Citi analyst Tyler Radke's team attended the AWS New York Summit (June 17-18), engaging with over 10 clients and partners. In a June 19 report, they highlighted the summit's focus on scaling agent AI for enterprise deployment. Citi maintains a "Buy" rating on Amazon, forecasting AWS revenue growth to accelerate to 37% in FY27 from 30% in FY26, noting this estimate may be conservative. Key takeaways: 1. **AWS Strategy Shift:** AWS is moving from proof-of-concepts to scalable deployment. New offerings like AWS Context (building enterprise knowledge graphs), Amazon Quick (cross-application AI assistant), and security tool Continuum address core enterprise pain points for AI adoption. 2. **Data Infrastructure Beneficiaries:** Data infrastructure companies like Snowflake, Elastic, Oracle, and ClickHouse are seen as direct beneficiaries of scaling AI workloads, as evidenced by strong growth and use cases presented. 3. **Critical Role of Data Governance:** As AI agents scale from hundreds to thousands, effective data governance becomes the key variable for deploying AI in core business processes. AWS Context represents AWS's strategic extension from providing compute/models to offering a data governance infrastructure layer. The report emphasizes that without solving data governance, AI will remain confined to pilot projects. The investment thesis focuses on AWS revenue acceleration and data infrastructure vendors' growth, while monitoring signals like AWS's quarterly revenue growth, Bedrock AgentCore task volume, and pricing impacts on companies like Elastic.

marsbit13 хв тому

Research Report Interpretation: Citi Attends AWS Summit, Bullish on Cloud Business Acceleration but Data Governance Remains Key Variable

marsbit13 хв тому

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

**Market Enters Critical Week: Bitcoin Pullback Test and HYPE Support Battle** The market enters a crucial phase of contention this week. The marginal shifts in Federal Reserve policy expectations continue to dictate the pricing rhythm for risk assets. Meanwhile, in the crypto market, following a period of sideways consolidation, the divergence between bulls and bears is becoming concentrated at key price levels. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** The 4-hour chart suggests BTC is in a five-wave structure since the June 5th low near $59,100. Price action shows a short-term rising channel. The recent drop below this channel's lower boundary is now being followed by a pullback attempt (wave 40-41). The outcome of this retest is critical. * **This Week's Outlook:** The core focus is whether BTC can reclaim and hold above the channel's lower boundary. * **Bullish Scenario:** A successful hold could lead to a continued rebound, potentially challenging the $69,500 - $70,500 resistance zone. * **Bearish Scenario:** Failure to hold may trigger a renewed test of the $59,000 - $60,000 core support area, with $55,000 as a deeper support level. * **Operational Strategy:** The author maintains a 20% mid-term short position initiated last week near $64,500, based on a model signaling a shift to a bearish structure. Short-term tactics involve using 30% capital for potential "spread" trades, with three contingency plans (A, B, C) outlined for reacting to resistance tests, breakouts, or support breakdowns. **HYPE Analysis & Strategy** * **Technical View:** On the 4-hour chart, HYPE shows strong momentum, having recently broken to a new high since January. The current pullback presents a clear three-wave correction structure, bringing the price back to the critical $64 - $66 support zone. * **This Week's Outlook:** The focus is on the battle for the $64 - $66 support area. * **Bullish Scenario:** Holding this support could signal a continuation of the uptrend from the June 10th low, leading to new highs. * **Bearish Scenario:** A breakdown could extend the correction, potentially testing the deeper $52 - $54 support band. * **Operational Strategy:** The recommended short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A light long position (under 30% capital) could be considered if HYPE shows stabilization signals at the $64-$66 or $52-$54 support zones, confirmed by model signals. Strict stop-loss discipline is emphasized. **General Risk Management:** A strict trailing stop-loss protocol is advised: set an initial stop; move to breakeven at +1% profit; lock in profits progressively thereafter. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as the author's personal technical perspective and trading log, not as investment advice. Markets are complex and dynamic; risk control is paramount.*

Odaily星球日报13 хв тому

Crucial Week of Contention: BTC Tests Support and HYPE's Key Level Battle | Special Analysis

Odaily星球日报13 хв тому

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

The article discusses ERC-8126, a proposed standard designed to address the lack of trust and verification for AI Agents operating on-chain. While ERC-8004 provides AI Agents with a basic on-chain identity (answering "Who are you?"), it does not guarantee trustworthiness. ERC-8126 aims to fill this gap by establishing a verification layer (answering "Are you reliable?"). It standardizes how independent verification providers can assess an agent's associated risks across five key areas: Token/Contract Verification (ETV), Media Content Verification (MCV), Solidity Code Verification (SCV), Web Application Verification (WAV), and Wallet Verification (WV). These providers generate a standardized risk score (0-100) and proofs based on their checks, without acting as a single authoritative certifier. This allows wallets, marketplaces, dApps, and other agents to consume these risk signals—for example, to display warnings, filter listings, or make interaction decisions. The standard also incorporates concepts like Private Data Verification (PDV) and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) to allow verification without exposing sensitive underlying data. Positioned alongside ERC-8004 (Identity) and ERC-8183 (Commerce for agents), ERC-8126 represents a step toward building a verifiable and accountable infrastructure for the emerging on-chain AI Agent economy, shifting trust assessment from purely user-based judgment to standardized, consumable signals.

marsbit31 хв тому

AI Agents Also Need 'Credit Checks': ERC-8126 is Filling the Gap in On-chain Trust

marsbit31 хв тому

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

Borrowed Belief: How much of Bitcoin ETF flows are real money? Weekly Bitcoin ETF flows, often interpreted as a measure of institutional conviction, are heavily influenced by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than genuine directional buying. A cash-and-carry arbitrage, where traders buy the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in a basis spread (the price difference between futures and spot), drives roughly half of the week-to-week flow volatility. This delta-neutral activity appears as ETF inflows but is unrelated to price views. Data shows a strong correlation (0.70) between weekly ETF inflows and increases in hedge fund short positions on CME futures, while Bitcoin’s weekly price returns have almost no explanatory power. However, this arbitrage activity dominates short-term *fluctuations*, not the cumulative *stock* of investments. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows since launch, only about $1 billion currently represents net arbitrage exposure. The vast majority consists of steady, directional buying averaging around $400 million per week. The arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund short positions peaking near $14 billion in late 2024 and declining to ~$4.5 billion. Recent ETF outflows partly reflect this ongoing unwind as the basis compresses, not a loss of faith in Bitcoin. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The headline number is more a gauge of arbitrage desk activity than conviction. For accurate interpretation, monitor the CME basis relative to Treasury yields and hedge fund net shorts—these reveal how much of the reported “demand” is truly directional.

marsbit33 хв тому

Rented Conviction: How Much Real Money Is Behind the Bitcoin ETF Flows

marsbit33 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片