8 小时流入 12 亿美元,EigenLayer 将交出什么答卷?

foresightnewsОпубліковано о 2024-02-06Востаннє оновлено о 2024-02-06

Анотація

EigenLayer 重启再质押窗口,用户需考虑单个 LST 33% 上限与充满不确定性的协议风险 。

EigenLayer 重启再质押窗口,用户需考虑单个 LST 33% 上限与充满不确定性的协议风险 。


撰文:Peng SUN,Foresight News


北京时间今日凌晨 4 点,EigenLayer 再次开放为期 4 天的 LST 再质押窗口,并取消所有 LST 存款上限。据 DefiLlama 数据,EigenLayer 今日已流入约 50 万枚 ETH(约 12.74 亿美元),TVL 超 30 亿美元,现为 36.46 亿美元。


在本次开放再质押窗口前,EigenLayer 表示团队正在引入一种分配再质押积分的新方法,该方法将把分配给任何 LST、LRT 或个人存款的再质押积分上限设定为未来发行总量的 33%。换言之,EigenLayer 积分已明确与代币空投绑定。但与此同时,单个 LST 上限已被限制为 33%,对于 Puffer 这样目前只提供单个 stETH 存款的协议来说,也是不小的挑战。


目前市场正处于 Restaking 风口,再质押热度犹存,但 EigenLayer AVS 服务尚未上线主网,其「共享安全」的业务尚未跑通,而其他 Restaking 协议大多只是存款,合约、LST 与提款均存在一定风险。热潮之后总会回归冷静,市场是否继续买单,Restaking 又将交出什么样的答卷,我们拭目以待。


一、EigenLayer 路线图进展


2023 年 6 月,EigenLayer 在以太坊上推出第一阶段主网。11 月,EigenLayer 推出 EigenLayer 和 EigenDA 的第二阶段测试网,拟于今年上半年进入第二阶段主网,目前仍是第二阶段测试网。EigenLayer 还计划于今年进入第三阶段测试网与主网。


按照路线图,EigenLayer 将于 2024 年第一季度上线主动验证服务(AVS)主网。目前,EigenLayer AVS 正处于测试网阶段。除 EigenDA 外,Aethos、AltLayer、Blockless、Drosera Network、Espresso、Ethos、Hyperlane、Lagrange、Near、Omni、Silence Laboratories、Witness Chain 均可为 EigenLayer AVS 测试网提供服务。


二、五次存款限额调整


自主网上线以来,EigenLayer 已 5 次开放存款窗口,并提高存款上限。


第一次是 2023 年 6 月,EigenLayer 最初将再质押代币上限设置为 9600 枚 LST,用户单笔最多存款 32 枚 ETH。


第二次是 2023 年 7 月,EigenLayer 每类 LST 上限(包括 rETH、stETH 和 cbETH)增加到 1.5 万枚,没有个人存款限制,总存款上限为 3 万枚。


第三次是 2023 年 8 月,EigenLayer 再次提高 LST(包括 rETH、stETH 和 cbETH)存款上限,每一枚 LST 再质押代币数量最多为 10 万枚。


第四次是 2023 年 12 月,EigenLayer 新增 6 种新的 LST,包括 wBETH、osETH、swETH、AnkrETH、EthX、oETH。所有 LST 代币存款上限设置为 20 万枚。1 月 3 日,当总存款限额接近 50 万枚时,EigenLayer 暂停存款。


第五次则是 2024 年 2 月 6 日,不仅新增 sfrxETH、mETH 与 LsETH 存款类别,还取消了所有 LST 的存款上限,唯一限制大概就是时间了,本次存款将于北京时间 2 月 10 日 04:00 暂停。


细数去年的 4 次调整,每次都在开放后不久快速触达硬顶。这一次,EigenLayer 不再对总存款与单笔存款作出限制,在开放 4 小时后增幅超 7.5 亿美元(约 32.6 万枚 ETH),截止发稿前的 8 小时后已流入 12.8 亿美元(约 55.7 万枚 ETH)。


三、其他 Restaking 协议


作为 EigenLayer 的「子孙后代」,Kelp DAO、Magpie、Renzo、ether.fi、Puffer 等头部协议进展与数据情况如何?对投资者来说,还有哪些窗口机会可以抓住?


基于 Eigenlayer 构建的原生流动性再质押协议 Puffer Finance 自 2 月 1 日开放存款,一周不到其 TVL 已达到约为 4.55 亿美元,用户在 2 月 9 日前参与 stETH 和 wstETH 质押可获双倍积分奖励,目前 Puffer 仍处于第二阶段。


多链流动性质押平台 Kelp DAO TVL 现为 3.13 亿美元,较 4 天前涨近 6000 万美元,涨幅约 22.7%。目前,ETHx、stETH、sfrxETH 均未达到各自 15 万枚、10 万枚、3 万枚存款上限。本次再质押存款窗口截止时间为 2 月 9 日。


多链收益协议 Magpie 创建的 SubDAO 组织 Eigenpie 的 LST 存款窗口开放至 2 月 10 日 3:00,用户可将其 stETH、rETH、mETH、sfrxETH 再质押至 Eigenpie 中。截止 2 月 6 日,Eigenpie 总锁仓价值(TVL)突破 2 亿美元,较上周翻了一倍。


流动性质押平台 ether.fi TVL 现为 7.52 亿美元,较 4 天前增幅约 48.3%,TVL 增加约 2.45 亿美元。1 月 31 日,ether.fi 开启 Mega Week 活动,持续至 2 月 11 日 02:00,将为用户提供忠诚度积分与 300 万 EigenLayer 积分。


基于 EigenLayer 构建的以太坊质押协议 Renzo 在 1 月 16 日完成 320 万美元的种子轮融资后,TVL 大幅上涨,但近期增幅较小,现为 2.05 亿美元,较 4 天前增加 5000 万美元,涨超 32%。Renzo 已于 2 月 6 日 4:00 支持 wBETH 存款。


四、Restaking 热的背后:空投预期


事实上,EigenLayer 的再质押在今年率先跑出很大程度上得益于生态项目的空投预期。譬如,1 月中旬,Rollup 即服务协议 AltLayer 公布空投标准与代币经济学,其中 13.05% 将分配给 EigenLayer 再质押用户。与此同时,Renzo 也公布 320 万美元种子轮融资,刷 Renzo 博空投预期达成,两则消息引爆市场对 Restaking 赛道的关注。


目前,EigenLayer、Eigenpie、Swell、ClayStack、Inception、Sommelier、GenesisLRT、Rest Finance 等 Restaking 协议已明确发币,除原生协议积分外,部分项目还可获得 EigenLayer 多重积分奖励。


更多项目可参考《Restaking 赛道大盘点,「质押年」不容错过的项目知多少?


五、风险提示


今日,Cobo 发布《EigenLayer 再质押的风险与最佳操作实践》,提示用户当前的 Restaking 协议存在合约风险、LST 风险与退出风险,并已与 Eigenpie、Kelp DAO、Renzo 等项目方进行沟通确认。


Пов'язані матеріали

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit35 хв тому

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit35 хв тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit52 хв тому

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit52 хв тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1 год тому

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3 год тому

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片