美联储主席对三月降息「泼冷水」,降息或推迟至5月以后?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-02-01Востаннє оновлено о 2024-02-01

Анотація

比特币将对利率决策更加敏感。

原文作者:Mary Liu,比推 BitpushNews

由于美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的鹰派言论浇灭了投资者对 3 月即将降息的预期,加密市场周三暴跌,比特币 (BTC) 跌破 42, 500 美元。

美联储主席对三月降息「泼冷水」,降息或推迟至5月以后?

美联储:在对接近 2% 通胀目标 「更有信心」之前,不宜降息

在 2024 年第一次联邦公开市场委员会会议后,美联储将基准联邦基金利率区间维持在 5.25% -5.5% 不变,符合市场预期。

市场参与者更关心的是有关美联储何时可能开始降息的线索,此次会议之前,许多观察家预计最早会在三月份的下一次会议上降息。

但美联储在今日的政策声明中指出,在对通胀接近 2% 目标「更有信心」之前,不宜降息。

鲍威尔在新闻发布会上更是直接泼冷水:「根据今天的会议,我想告诉你们,我认为委员会不太可能在三月份的会议上达到这样做的信心水平,这还有待观察。三月或不是最有可能[降息]的情况」。

美联储何时降息是一个微妙的平衡,几位 FOMC 委员曾提出等待太久才降息的风险,认为这可能会损害强劲的劳动力市场。另一方面,过于仓促的行动也存在风险,可能会导致通胀重新被点燃。

当被问及降息的时间表时,鲍威尔宰新闻发布会中表示,劳动力市场数据和通胀数据仍将是值得关注的数据。

鲍威尔表示:「如果我们看到……尤其是劳动力市场出现意外疲软,那肯定会影响更快的降息。当然,如果我们看到通胀更加粘性或更高,那么这类事情就会支持稍后采取行动。」

此言论发表后,包括加密货币在内的风险资产立即大幅下跌。 BTC 从当日高点 43, 700 美元跌至 42, 300 美元,过去 24 小时下跌 2.3% 。

其他主流币种,如 ETH、Cardano 的 ADA、Avalanche 的 AVAX 和 Polkadot 的 DOT 下跌了 3% -4% ,而 Solana 的 SOL 当天下跌超过 6% ,跌破 100 美元。

传统金融市场中,标普 500 指数创去年 9 月 21 日以来最大单日跌幅,纳指创去年 10 月 25 日以来最大单日跌幅,道指创去年 12 月 20 日以来最大单日跌幅。

降息被推迟至 5 月以后?

Asgard Markets 宏观分析师兼联合创始人 Alex Krüger 在 X 帖子中表示:「市场在利率方面已经超前了。降息从五月或六月开始,而不是三月。」

摩根大通资产管理公司首席全球策略师 David Kelly 表示,美联储已经制定了从 6 月份开始的降息时间表。

他在美联储声明发布后接受 CNBC 采访时表示:「在我看来,他们正在考虑 6 月、 9 月、 12 月–今年三次降息–前提是经济持续增长,目前似乎没有迹象表明美国经济将很快崩溃并陷入衰退。 在他们认为市场大幅上涨对经济造成更大损害(或潜在损害)之前,他们只会看到风险平衡更多地倾向于粘性通胀,而不是经济陷入衰退。 」

经济数据聚合商 Truflation 的产品主管 Oliver Rust 表示:「何时开始降息的决定可以说是比加息更重要、更微妙的决定,因此未来两个月的经济数据将至关重要。」 。

Web3 金融科技平台 YouHodler 市场主管 Ruslan Lienkha 表示,「任何有关高利率持续时间长于预期的鹰派言论都可能引发股市调整,从而导致资本从风险资产(例如比特币)流出。」

比特币将对利率决策更加敏感

然而,Swissblock 分析师在周三的市场报告中表示,比特币的下行趋势可能有限,因为似乎在 44, 000 美元至 42, 000 美元之间盘整,没有明确的方向。报告补充说, 42, 000 美元区域和 40, 000 美元以下的水平可能成为买家可能介入的价格关键支撑位。

CoinShares 研究主管 James Butterfill 表示,随着金融机构越来越多地通过多个现货比特币 ETF 参与市场,比特币将变得对利率决策更加敏感。

Butterfill 表示:「比特币价格已与期货市场利率预期重新调整,这表明比特币将对利率敏感的宏观数据(例如就业和消费者物价指数)更加敏感,尤其是在围绕 ETF 的兴奋感减弱的情况下」。

事实上,根据芝商所 FedWatch 工具的数据, 市场对 3 月份降息的押注已从美联储决议前的约 65% 降至目前的 34.5% 。

美联储主席对三月降息「泼冷水」,降息或推迟至5月以后?

即将发布的数据可能会让政策制定者更准确的做出决定,美国关键制造业指数将于周四更新,周五将发布 1 月份就业报告,美联储三月份会议之前还有两份通胀报告。

Пов'язані матеріали

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手3 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手3 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit5 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit5 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手7 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手7 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit8 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit8 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片