一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-01-29Востаннє оновлено о 2024-01-29

Анотація

活动包括三重收益:Eigenpie积分、Eigenlayer积分和IDO份额。

原文作者:CapitalismLab

Magpie 针对 LRT 的 subDAO @Eigenpiexyz_io 今天开启了积分活动,这是目前为止 LRT 项目中给 TVL 提供者最大蛋糕的,项目有特色外加此前 Magpie 的 subDAO 有着不菲的收益,配置价值恒奥。

本 Thread 将分析 Eigenpie 的空投玩法,机制,前景,和收益预期,帮你明明白白地取得最大化收益。

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

A. 空投玩法

当前存 stETH 等 LST 进去可以获取三重收益:

  • Eigenpie 积分,对应总量 10% 的空投

  • Eigenlayer 积分 ( 2 月 5 日 Eigenlayer 开放存款后)

  • Eigenpie 对应总量 24% IDO 份额, 3 M FDV 低估值

  • 所存 LST 的基础收益(比如 mETH APR 是 7% 那你可以继续享受 7% )

积分会根据车队总规模提供增益,越大的车队增幅越大,最高两倍,所以最好抱团取暖。

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

B. 机制

Eigenpie 做的是为 isolate LRT(ILRT),每个 LST 发一个对应的 Token 隔离风险,参见下表

当前 Eigenlayer 上了这么多 LST,如果一个 LRT 项目笼统接受的话,那么这个项目要承担所有底层 LST 的风险,一旦某一个 LST 出现安全问题可能就会对其造成毁灭性的打击

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

所以就有了 Eigenpie 的 ILRT 可以隔离风险

隔离了风险也隔离了流动性,这是否会有问题呢?其实也不染,支持 LST 的 LRT 相比 支持 Native Staking 的 LRT,优势之一便在于可以充分利用底层 LST 的流动性。mrETH/rETH,mmETH/mETH 这些单独的 pair 其实更有利于和 LST 项目方合作激励流动性

C. 前景

这个项目有什么优势?毕竟发的的确晚了一些,但是目前的确有一块需求空缺尚未被填补:上了 Eigenlayer 的 LST 都迫切希望参与到 LRT 叙事中,而 Eigenpie 目前来看是最好的方案,每个 LST 又有独立的 LRT 不用担心给其他人做了嫁衣。像 mETH 这种利率更高的 LST,也可以继续发挥其优势。

Mint 出来的 mstETH 这些什么时候可以在 DEX 交易?是否会上 Pendle?

显而易见的是项目方有极大意愿和能力推进这些,无他,这些都可以带给 Magpie 旗下的 Cakepie,Penpie 这些 subDAO 丰厚的贿赂收益

如果你对 Magpie 的架构不了解的话,可以参考我们此前的推文

D. 收益预期

收益这边我们先看下代币经济:

• IDO: 40% 

• 空投: 10% 

• 激励 35% 

• Magpie Treasury: 15% (按照惯例不出售,staking 分红给 vlMGP)

基本是一个 FairLaunch 的操作,不同之处在于目前大部分 Fairlaunch 白名单内定比较多,而这个的 IDO 白名单大部分都明牌给 TVL 提供者

给到 TVL 提供者的权益是

  • 总量 10% 的空投

  • 60% 的 IDO 份额,IDO 占总量的 40% ,$ 3 M FDV 估值

就是说总量的 10% + 60% * 40% = 34% 都会给到 TVL 提供者,这占了初始流通的 34% / 50% = ~ 70% ,今后也没有 VC 抛压这些

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

目前 LRT 叙事非常火热,仅有 $ 7 M TVL 的 $RSTK 都有 $ 35 M mcap 和 $ 180 M FDV,目前已经发布其他几个项目的估值也非常之高

Eigenpie 最终的 TVL 多半会远高于 RSTK,如果按照 $RSTK 的 FDV 对标的话,TVL 提供者的总利润也可达: 10% * 180+ 60% * 40% *( 180-3)= $ 60 M

假设两个月后发币,平均 TVL 为 $ 200 M 的话,也是可以达到 ( 60/2)/200* 12 = 180% 的 APR,这还不包括底层 Eigenlayer points 的收益,在前 15 天作为早期提供者参与还有 2 倍的点数增幅

我们再看下此前 magpie 的 subDAO IDO 至今的涨幅

  • Penpie,IDO 3 M FDV, 14 倍

  • Radpie,两轮 IDO 平均 7.5 M FDV, 1.4 倍

  • Cakepie,IDO 20 M FDV, 2.4 倍

此番进军市场更大的 LRT 赛道,不但拿出了 3 M FDV,给到 TVL 提供者的空投和 IDO 份额均是当年 PNP 的数倍,不知收益是否会复刻甚至超越

总结:

1. 空投需要抱团取暖获取更大增幅,抱团链接:https://eigenlayer.magpiexyz.io/?ref=0x307225Bc52ef0fEDAa67b626996c0E74cEA924Ee

2. 特色机制为 ILRT 隔离各个 LST 的风险

3. 优势还有可以充分利用 Magpie 积累的 Pendle/Pancake 资源加速发展

4. 绝大部分权益明牌给到 TVL 提供者,IDO 额度透明的 Fairlaunch

一文读懂Eigenpie的空投玩法,如何获取最大收益?

原文链接

Пов'язані матеріали

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit8 хв тому

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit8 хв тому

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit14 хв тому

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit14 хв тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2 год тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2 год тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片