[dragon and tiger list] BTC investors account for 76% of profits. How can investors who lose 80% of their profits in one year get back

Huobi ResearchОпубліковано о 2022-05-06Востаннє оновлено о 2022-05-07

Анотація

On the weekly K-line level, the decline of BTC has reached the key point of $36078 corresponding to 50% of Fibonacci.

1. Market trend: low rebound, creating trading opportunities

On the weekly K-line level, the decline of BTC has reached the key point of $36078 corresponding to 50% of Fibonacci. On May 5, BTC hit a minimum of US $35500 and once fell below 50% of Fibonacci in the short term, with clear signs of adjustment. Meanwhile, in terms of decline within one year, since the decline of US $57446 on May 5, 2021, the cumulative decline of BTC has expanded to 38%.

In terms of support worthy of attention, 61.8% of Fibonacci's support is more effective. It was recognized as a typical support line in mid-2021, and the corresponding price is US $28308. At present, the support corresponding to 50% is weak, and the risk of BTC falling near us $36078 increases.

Defensive investors can refer to US $28308 suggested by 61.8% Fibonacci as an important low suction point, and pay attention to the buying opportunities from this split line to US $36078 upward and US $17246 downward.

In terms of indicators, measuring the overall profit proportion of BTC investors is very important to confirm trading opportunities. The decrease in the ratio of BTC's profitable utxo to the total utxo will reduce the selling pressure brought by profitable investors and increase the probability of BTC's bottom building success accordingly.

The latest data show that the utxo of BTC was 76.34% on May 22, indicating that most investors in transfer transactions still made profits. Historically, investors can effectively verify the bottom signal after their profitability has fallen to the range of 40% to 60%. Before that, investors who buy BTC at a low price can build positions in batches, so as to effectively avoid risks.

Considering that BTC has been adjusted for more than one year since 2021, the chip concentration of more than $30000 has increased. Therefore, in the phase of BTC's continued retreat, the reduction of investor profitability may appear in the near future.

2. Rise and fall performance of top 100 currencies in market value within one year

Over the past year, among the top 100 currencies with market value, Shib has the highest increase, reaching 1078%. Secondly, gamefi concept currency Gala, algorithm stability currency Luna, FXS and meta universe concept sand all increased by more than 200%.

On the decline list, fil, flow and Neo fell by 90.9%, 86.4% and 85% respectively. In the bear market, when the decline reaches 80%, the maximum cash holding loss can also reach 80%. In this way, the increase required for breakeven can reach up to 500%. Therefore, in the face of the bear market, it is important to reduce positions and buy at a low price, so as to reduce losses and seize the opportunity to buy at a low price.

3. Rise and fall performance of top 300 currencies in market value within one year

Among the top 300 currencies by market value, the volatility intensity in the past year is higher. On the list of increase, the largest increase of the top 300 market value currencies was ceek, with 5085%, and the second highest flex increased by 1517%.

In terms of the decline list, among the top 10 currencies with the largest decline, comp has the smallest decline of 87%, and there are as many as 6 currencies with a decline of more than 90%. Only from the decline list, among the investors who have held money for a year, they have lost the most money on fil, XCH and comp. In terms of circulation market value, the circulation market value of fil, XCH and comp can reach US $2.732 billion, US $177 million and US $697 million. The larger the market value, the corresponding loss of circulation market value can reach US $24 billion, US $1.59 billion and US $6.2 billion respectively.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbit1 год тому

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbit1 год тому

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbit2 год тому

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbit2 год тому

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbit2 год тому

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片