比RSIC更公平?一文了解即将空投的Runestone

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-01-27Востаннє оновлено о 2024-01-27

Анотація

空投具体标准:拥有3个或更多非文本/JSON 铭文。

原文作者:鉴叔(X:@jianshubiji

相关阅读:

《RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes 协议的预热工具?》

编者按:RSIC 的空投及创新符文挖矿玩法一时引爆市场,FOMO 情绪下,RSIC 价格飙到了 1700 U。然而,项目方预留 10% 份额的行为也被社区质疑有违铭文公平发行的核心观念。Runestone 是 @ord_io 的创始人 @LeonidasNFT 受 RSIC 启发所开启的一个实验项目。Leonidas 表示不喜欢 RSIC 自称第一个符文的宣传方式,暗示了 RSIC 分配方式的不公平,并称 Runestone 即将给 Ordinals 社区免费空投。加密 KOL 鉴叔(X:@jianshubiji)发文简要介绍了关于 Runestone 的基本信息,Odaily星球日报整理如下:

$RSIC 开启了符文空投的先河,因其新颖的空投+挖矿+符文的玩法,市场情绪很 FOMO,价格从 200 U 涨到了现在 1700 U。 

没收到 $RSIC 的空投没关系,一个更公平的符文—— Runestone(符号为 ᛤ)即将免费向 Ordinals 活跃地址空投。

下面是关于 Runestone 的具体介绍。

比RSIC更公平?一文了解即将空投的Runestone

一、起源

Runestone 是由 @ord_io 的创始人 @LeonidasNFT $RSIC 的启发所开启的一个实验项目。

$RSIC 的只空投给了一些比特币蓝筹 NFT 的部分持有者,而且团队预留了 10% 的份额,在分配上并不是特别公平。 Leonidas 不喜欢 $RSIC 自称第一个符文的宣传方式,并且暗示了 $RSIC 分配方式的不公平,于是做出了 Runestone 给 Ordinals 社区免费空投,并且在社区中募集了 7 万美元作为空投的费用。

二、空投规则

Runestone 已经在区块高度 826, 600 完成快照(Ordinals 诞生一周年)。 

Runestone 的总量共 11 万张,每个地址最多一张,将以铭文的形式进行空投,等到 Casey 完成对符文协议的开发后,将 Runestone 符文 1 : 1 空投给铭文持有人(最近 Casey 在玩博德之门 3 ,希望符文能够如期上线吧,哈哈哈)。

比RSIC更公平?一文了解即将空投的Runestone

Leonidas 筛选标准考虑了以下因素: 

  • 持有铭文的数量 

  • 铭文的文件类型(文本/ json),不同格式的铭文可能有不同的分配权重 

以上包含诅咒铭文(不知道打废的铭文算不算)

比RSIC更公平?一文了解即将空投的Runestone

基于以上因素,Leonidas 于今天发布了空投的具体标准:拥有 3 个或更多非文本/JSON 铭文。

三、ᛤ 与 Rune 的起源

ᛤ 源自盎格鲁-撒克逊符文,语义无从考证。 

Rune 希腊语的意义为“秘密”,传说由魔法之神、战争与死亡之神、知识之神-奥丁所创。最早发现出处在 101 年,沿用至今,有大量神秘学知识(该部分图文来自@micaiOXS)。

比RSIC更公平?一文了解即将空投的Runestone

四、需要注意的问题 

  • 快照已经结束了,不用专门去打铭文

  • 空投的时间还没确定,可以关注创始人推特 @LeonidasNFT

  • 空投的是铭文,符文等 Casey 完成 Rune 协议就会 1 : 1 空投,Casey 计划在比特币减半(即区块高度 840000)时发布。

  • Runestone 是空投的,等着到账就可以了,没有任何的铸造地点,所有让你铸造的都是骗子。 

最后,希望每个粉丝都能拿到 Runestone 的空投吧,毕竟我也发过那么多期比特币铭文的内容了。

原文链接


Пов'язані матеріали

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit11 хв тому

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit11 хв тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit23 хв тому

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit23 хв тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit26 хв тому

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit26 хв тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbit31 хв тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

marsbit31 хв тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手36 хв тому

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手36 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片