RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes协议的预热工具?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-01-24Востаннє оновлено о 2024-01-24

Анотація

社区关注点落在:项目方为何保留10%?

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes协议的预热工具?

近期,铭文市场中出现一个在玩法上创新的项目——RSIC,该项目不像之前铭文项目的铸造模式,而将 RSIC 当作类似于"矿机"的存在,开采基于 Ordinals 创始人 Casey 新开发的 Runes 协议符文。

同时,两者的名字相似性导致社区以为是 Casey 主导该项目,但抛开其他因素的存在,单看该项目确实给热度下降的铭文板块带来了新的空间。

下面,Odaily星球日报将进一步介绍 RSIC 项目及其发展路线。

RSIC 是一种点对点的符文分配系统,共计 21000 枚符文,其中 10% 团队预留, 11 枚 RSIC 转至中本聪的账户,剩余的铭文将空投至 Ordinals 社区的 9211 个地址,空投标准并没有详细说明,如果钱包中有 ORDI、节点猴等资产可以关注一下。

根据官方介绍,RSIC 本身是开采符文的特定铭文电路,乍一听觉得比较模糊,本质上可以将其视为“矿机”,其中空投给 Ordinals 社区地址的 RSIC 需要再转移一次方可激活开采能力,二级市场购买则会自动激活。

激活后的 RSIC 将在比特币网络新生区块中开采符文,具体开采的数量目前还无法查询,后续官方将提供查询前端。需要注意的是,RSIC 的数量在同一地址的持有量越多,开采的符文数量越多,不设置上限。

RSIC 真正让社区感到有意思的玩法在于开采过程中有四种不同分配符文方式,分别是固定模式、随机模式、增强模式以及减半模式:

  • 固定奖励:符文供应的 30% 将以固定奖励的方式分配。每个活跃的 RSIC 每块将获得 21 个固定奖励的符文。

  • 增强奖励:符文供应的 30% 将以增强奖励的方式分配。所有的 RSIC 都可以获得一次增强奖励。增强奖励的具体激活方式将在第 4703400000000 块发布,并通过哈希值75213f19413514e4ab30ba79a6b5713e333c91e7679c35dca979f70ea5f9c1f5进行说明。

  • 随机奖励:随机奖励占符文供应的 25% ,奖励包括 25% 基础奖励+固定和增强的剩余符文。每个块的额外奖励通过随机哈希进行分配。如果用户的 RSIC 类型代码与给定区块哈希的最后一位数字对齐,其 RSIC 将在该区块中挖掘 336 个符文。所有的 RSIC 通过视觉提示(例如橙色)指示与当前块的哈希对齐。

  • 减半奖励:在第 840, 000 块上进行 5 次分配,包括完全稀释的 5% 、 4% 、 3% 、 2% 和 1% 的符文供应。当挖掘到第 840, 000 块时,每个 RSIC 都将在该地址的连续块中获得一张抽奖券。

以上四种模式将挖矿奖励的随机性提升,更像是一种铭文开采游戏,于此同时,KOL Sillycat.sats 在 X 平台分享其根据 RSIC 的特殊符号制作的 RSIC 稀有度表。

RSIC:创新符文挖矿玩法,Runes协议的预热工具?

根据上图来看,不同的 RSIC 的稀有度略有不同,但官方尚未公布其细则,但既然具备稀有度的属性,或许还会衍生出新的玩法。

目前 RSIC 所开采的符文需要等到 Runes 比特币协议上线后才能铸造,铸造后 RSIC 的后续作用尚不可知,或许单纯作为挖矿工具,在瞬息万变的新兴市场中,其后续价值归零也有不排除可能性。

但这依旧没有阻挡 RSIC 在二级市场的火爆,根据 OKX Web3钱包的铭文板块来看,上线仅 2 天,RSIC 目前地板价 0.0355 BTC(约合 1420 USDT),总交易额约为 113 BTC。

RSIC 的玩法为铭文板块带来了新的机制,但项目方预留 10% RSIC,依旧被社区群嘲违背铭文公平发行的核心观念。单从项目空投给社区的角度出发,项目方的运作以及营销模式脱离之前的野蛮生长的铭文玩法,其空投的费用以及精心的设计更符合传统代币玩法。

这一切言论还需等项目的后续发展,目前官方仅提供了 RSIC 开采符文的玩法,但后续的细则尚未公布,让子弹再飞一会。

Пов'язані матеріали

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbit51 хв тому

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbit51 хв тому

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbit1 год тому

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbit1 год тому

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbit2 год тому

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片