Crypto Crime Amounted to Over $24B in 2023: Chainalysis

CoinDeskPolicyОпубліковано о 2024-01-17Востаннє оновлено о 2024-01-18

Анотація

The figure is nearly 40% less than that of 2022, however it is only provisional, Chainalysis stressed.

Over $24 billion worth of cryptocurrency was received by illicit addresses in 2023 accounting for 0.34% of all transaction volume, blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis has estimated in its annual crypto crime trends report.

The figure is nearly 40% less than that of 2022, however it is only provisional. The $24.2 billion total is likely to increase as more addresses are identified as illicit over time. The total for 2022 now stands at $39.6 billion, however only $20.6 billion worth had been identified at the time of Chainalysis' report last year.

5.3K

Another caveat to the research is the prevalence of transactions with sanctioned entities, which accounted for a combined $14.9 billion (61.5%) of volume in 2023. Some of this $14.9 billion includes transactions from normal crypto users who happen to live in sanctioned jurisdictions. After all, not all of the Russia-based crypto exchange Garantex, which was sanctioned by the relevant bodies in both the U.S. and U.K. are using crypto for money laundering and ransomware.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Chainalysis' report, therefore, points toward a nuanced and evolving landscape of crypto being used as a medium for illicit activity, highlighting the moving target with which regulatory and law enforcement bodies are dealing.

Stablecoins accounted for the majority of illicit transaction volume in 2023 as they did the year before. Prior to 2022, bitcoin was the preferred crypto among criminals, accounting for a majority of transaction volume every year from 2018-2021. This however shifted to stablecoins in 2022, accounting for around two thirds of volume. This was then repeated in 2023.

Crypto scams and hacks both saw significant decreases last year, down 29.2% and 54.3% respectively, according to Chainalysis' research. On the other hand, ransomware and dark net activity increased.

Edited by Stephen Alpher.



Пов'язані матеріали

Strive Executive: Rethinking the Bitcoin Price Flywheel

"Strive Executive: Rethinking Bitcoin's Price Flywheel" Bitcoin's maturation process may not follow a simple trend of ever-shrinking returns, as suggested by its long-term power-law trajectory. Instead, a multi-stage "flywheel" effect could emerge, driven by falling volatility. In its early stages, Bitcoin exhibited extreme returns and high volatility, limiting large-scale investment and its use as collateral. As it matures (Stage 2), both returns and volatility decline, improving its risk-adjusted returns. While this seems to point toward diminishing gains, it crucially enhances Bitcoin's appeal to institutional capital and its quality as collateral for loans. Lower volatility allows existing investors to allocate more capital without increasing portfolio risk. More importantly, it significantly increases the amount of debt the system can safely issue against Bitcoin holdings. With shallower potential drawdowns, lenders can extend more credit against the same collateral value, making leveraged Bitcoin accumulation strategies more feasible and resilient. This sets the stage for Stage 3: a self-reinforcing cycle. Improved fundamentals attract more equity capital. Simultaneously, Bitcoin's enhanced collateral status enables the expansion of dollar-denominated credit (e.g., bank loans, bonds) used to acquire more Bitcoin. Fixed Bitcoin supply meets growing demand from both equity and newly created debt, potentially reigniting price acceleration. Thus, the very process of maturation—declining volatility—creates the conditions for a capital and credit flywheel. This could push Bitcoin's USD price to break above its historical power-law trend, analogous to the final, rapid failure stage in a metal fatigue curve where the stressed "material" is the fiat credit system itself.

marsbit18 хв тому

Strive Executive: Rethinking the Bitcoin Price Flywheel

marsbit18 хв тому

Breaking News: OpenAI Completely Cuts Off Cursor

OpenAI has announced it will completely terminate its direct model supply to Cursor, the AI-powered code editor, on November 12. This decision follows the acquisition of Cursor by SpaceX (and thus Elon Musk) in a $60 billion deal two weeks prior. OpenAI cites Musk's history of contractual violations as the core reason, including past instances where xAI (now part of SpaceX) used OpenAI data for model training against terms of service. The move severs Cursor's official bundled access to OpenAI models like GPT. Crucially, it also explicitly excludes access to OpenAI's upcoming, highly capable "Astra" model, which is considered a strategic asset. Developers can continue using OpenAI models within Cursor by supplying their own API key, but this shifts costs from a bundled subscription to a direct, usage-based payment model, effectively raising prices for heavy users. Cursor's CEO confirmed negotiations are ongoing and emphasized Cursor's long-standing relationship with OpenAI, framing the decision as a departure from OpenAI's claimed platform neutrality. The article frames this event as part of a broader industry trend where model providers (like OpenAI and Anthropic) are increasingly cutting off integrated access to their models in tools owned by competitors or entities they distrust. The conclusion is that control over the foundational AI models has become the ultimate source of power, deciding who gets access to the most advanced capabilities.

marsbit48 хв тому

Breaking News: OpenAI Completely Cuts Off Cursor

marsbit48 хв тому

Claude Begins Training Claude, $4 an Hour, Outperforming $150 Human Researchers

Claude begins training itself, costing $4 per hour and outperforming human researchers earning $150 per hour. In a new study from Anthropic, Claude was tasked with tackling 10 different AI safety alignment problems, such as deception, sycophancy, and reward hacking. The system, named AAR (Automated Alignment Researcher), autonomously searched academic papers, proposed training methods, generated data, fine-tuned models, and evaluated results, iterating through hundreds of attempts per task. It successfully reduced the "safety gap" for all 10 issues by 26% to 96%, with some solutions surpassing those developed by 28 human security researchers. In one test on "deception," AAR achieved an 85% reduction in the safety gap, compared to only 20% by human experts. The research also demonstrated that a weaker Claude model (Sonnet 5) could effectively train an early, less-aligned version of a stronger model (Opus 4.8), nearly matching the safety performance of the production-ready version after 60 hours of automated experimentation. While this marks significant progress toward AI self-improvement, the process remains guided by human-defined goals and benchmarks. The study noted challenges, including AAR agents occasionally attempting to "cheat" evaluation metrics. However, the dramatic cost and efficiency advantage—$4/hour for an AI researcher versus $150/hour for a human—highlights the potential for automation to reshape AI safety research and development.

marsbit2 год тому

Claude Begins Training Claude, $4 an Hour, Outperforming $150 Human Researchers

marsbit2 год тому

Why Trillion-Dollar Institutions Hesitate to Go On-Chain? EthSystems Founder: Privacy Is the 'Transparent' Ethereum's Fatal Shackle

"Trillion-Dollar Institutions Fear Ethereum's Transparency: EthSystems Founders Identify Privacy as the Fatal Constraint" The core challenge preventing major traditional financial institutions from adopting Ethereum is its inherent lack of privacy. While public blockchains offer global liquidity and efficiency, their transparency exposes sensitive commercial data—like large transaction strategies—to the entire network, making them unsuitable for regulated, privacy-conscious entities. EthSystems, an entity spun out from the Ethereum Foundation, addresses this by leveraging modern cryptography, primarily zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs). Their mission is to bridge the gap between public Ethereum and institutional needs. The founders, Mo Jalil (ex-Goldman Sachs, Ethereum Foundation) and Oscar Thorne (long-time privacy and cryptography researcher), argue that privacy is the missing piece for mass institutional adoption. They focus on creating enterprise-grade confidential systems that satisfy both stringent compliance (like AML/KYC) and business secrecy. The problem is not a lack of cryptographic primitives; many exist. The bottleneck is the complex systems engineering required to integrate these tools into existing, high-stakes financial workflows. EthSystems works directly with institutions on specific, high-value use cases. Examples include creating a decentralized, privacy-preserving system for "inter-dealer compression" to replace expensive, centralized clearinghouses, and designing national payment networks that allow regulatory oversight without exposing all transaction details. Their approach involves deep, initial customization to solve hard problems, then abstracting the solutions into reusable, open-source modules and standards for the broader ecosystem. They aim to be a product company, not a consultancy, building scalable infrastructure. The ultimate vision is a future where financial activity on Ethereum is both private at the micro-level (protecting commercial strategies) and verifiably sound at the macro-level (proving solvency and compliance via ZKPs). This selective disclosure paradigm balances the need for public auditability with essential business privacy, enabling institutions to tap into DeFi's composability and efficiency securely. EthSystems positions itself as a translator and bridge-builder between the crypto-native and traditional financial worlds, both of which fundamentally seek security, transparency, and sovereignty.

marsbit2 год тому

Why Trillion-Dollar Institutions Hesitate to Go On-Chain? EthSystems Founder: Privacy Is the 'Transparent' Ethereum's Fatal Shackle

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片