Ordinals之外的创新:详解Stamps与SRC-20代币

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-12-21Востаннє оновлено о 2023-12-21

Анотація

Stamps最近引发了爆炸式增长,使比特币开启了新的可能性。

原文标题:《Bitcoin Stamps Explained》

原文作者:WILLIAM M. PEASTER

原文来源:banklesshq

原文编译:深潮 TechFlow

最近,Ordinals 引发了比特币(及其他链)上「铭文」代币化活动的爆炸式增长。

然而,还有另一个相对较新的比特币代币化协议——Stamps,最近也在逐渐获得关注。

你没听说过 Stamps 或 SRC-20 吗?别担心。在今天的文章中,让我们来了解一下 Stamps 是如何工作的,又与 Ordinals 有何不同,以及如何进入这条赛道!

比特币 Stamps 的兴起

Ordinals之外的创新:详解Stamps与SRC-20代币

比特币 Stamps 系统由 Mike In Space 于 2023 年 3 月发布,最初是 Counterparty 上的一个概念验证项目(一个自 2014 年以来就存在的比特币 L2)。由于其底层协议的更新,Stamps 已完全转向比特币,去年夏天,现在被称为 SRC-20 。

创始人 Mike 最初将 Stamps 设想为铸造永久性比特币 NFT 的一种方式。然而,该协议已经扩展到复制 BRC-20 ,这是一种批量可替代代币,自 Casey Rodarmor 于 2023 年 1 月推出 Ordinals 以来,由于铭文热潮的兴起,这种代币在比特币上蓬勃发展。

Stamps 和 Ordinals 之间的主要区别在于架构。这是因为 Stamps 将它们的元数据存储在多重签名未花费交易输出(UTXO)中,而 Ordinals 则将它们的元数据存储在比特币交易的「见证」部分中。

这种设计上的区别显现出了开发者的取舍。就是说,Stamps 的 UTXO 方法使它们不可修剪,因此看起来是永久性的,尽管它们的制造成本比 Ordinals 铸造更昂贵。相反,Ordinals 使用见证数据的方式最终使它们可被修剪,它们的制造成本比 Stamps 更低。

因此,虽然 Ordinals 可能为当今加密领域的 NFT 提供最佳的持久性成本比(也可以在以太坊上获得链上 NFT,但它们的构建成本相对比 Ordinals 更高),但 Stamps 目前似乎提供了最佳的直接永久性保证。

尽管如此,并不是每个人都觉得这些 Stamps、Ordinals 是百利而无一害的!

例如,像 Luke Dashjr 这样的老派强硬派比特币支持者最近对 Ordinals 和 Stamps 这发起了攻击,称 Ordinals 和 Stamps 是针对比特币的垃圾邮件攻击。就 Dashjr 本人而言,他新成立的 Ocean 矿池已经设置为过滤铭文和 Stamps 交易,他还提出了改变比特币为另一种工作量证明(PoW)算法的想法,以此来反抗支持 NFT 的比特币矿工。

Ordinals之外的创新:详解Stamps与SRC-20代币

也许比特币社区最终会因为这些分歧而再次分裂。另一场关于区块大小的战争可能正在到来,一边是支持 Ordinals、Stamps 的技术创新派,另一边则是认为「比特币只是货币」的保守主义派。

不过,就目前而言,Dashjr 最近的评论只是火上浇油,因为近日来,围绕 Stamps 的关注和活动似乎已达到了新的历史高点。事实上,有史以来的第一和第二个 Stamps 刚以 1.7 个比特币(约 15 万美元)的价格被捆绑销售,这表明人们的兴趣激增。

当然,Stamps 市场可能会像所有资产一样经历繁荣和衰退的周期,但无论如何,这项技术都是合法且引人注目的。Stamps 之所以有趣,不仅在于它们的永久性,还因为它们像 Ordinals 一样,提供了一种新的代币标准,为比特币打开了以前不存在的新可能性。

像以太坊和 Solana 这样的智能合约平台多年来已经享有原生代币标准,并且几乎不需要此类技术。相反,随着 Ordinals 和 Stamps 等先进技术开始脱颖而出,并释放出前所未有的需求,比特币生态在 2023 年开始爆发。

换句话说,目前是比特币的复兴时期。那么,假设你已经尝试过 Ordinals,那要怎么探索 Stamps 呢?

Ordinals之外的创新:详解Stamps与SRC-20代币

在钱包方面,我建议从类似 Leather(之前叫 Hiro)这样的比特币钱包开始,它支持 Ordinals 和 Stamps 以及 BRC-20 和 SRC-20 。如果你有使用 Coinbase Wallet、MetaMaskRainbow 这样的浏览器钱包的经验,你会发现使用 Leather 很方面。尽管是以比特币为中心的方式,但它提供了类似于这些主流产品的用户体验。

也就是说,无论你做什么,都建议你不要用旧的比特币钱包来研究 Stamps。如果您尝试使用不兼容的钱包来使用资产,您可能会丢失资产!

一旦你准备好了相应的比特币钱包,你就可以开始寻找 Stamp NFT 铸造或 SRC-20 代币。OpenStamp 是一个您目前可以同时进行这两项操作的平台,但您现在也可以考虑其他一些早期市场,包括 RareStamp、Stampscan 和 StampedNinja。如果你对铸造自己的 Stamps 感兴趣,可以试试 Stampsbot 这个平台。

最终,Stamps 是否会成为加密生态系统中的一个永久性组成部分,这仍是一个悬而未决的问题。然而,Stamps 目前的受欢迎程度以及它们为比特币引入的新可能性不容忽视。与 Ordinals 相结合,Stamps 使得比特币的创新场景在未来几年可能会越来越繁荣,这也意味着会带来与讨厌 JPG 的比特币极端主义者的更多争端。

原文链接

Пов'язані матеріали

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

In an unprecedented move mirroring the control of enriched uranium, the US Commerce Department has imposed an export control ban on Anthropic's advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, forcing their global shutdown. This marks the first time a purely digital entity—a set of neural network weights—has been subjected to such hardware-like strategic export restrictions, based not on physical scarcity but on its concentrated "capability density." The article draws a direct parallel to the historical control of nuclear technology, arguing that just as uranium ore becomes a controlled substance only when enriched to a critical threshold, AI capabilities become subject to regulation when compressed into a single, potent, and easily accessible interface. This "enriched AI" is seen as crossing a threshold where its aggregated power poses a potential threat. The author predicts three major consequences over the next decade. First, capability auditing will become institutionalized, with governments setting compliance checklists and thresholds for model power, triggering automatic export controls. Second, jurisdictional boundaries will blur as US export controls extend their reach globally, governing any user of American AI services regardless of location, forcing non-US entities to reconsider their AI supply chain dependencies. Third, a technological bifurcation will occur, splitting the AI landscape into a restricted, high-risk track of advanced US proprietary models and a more reliable track of open-source or locally developed alternatives, where guaranteed access may outweigh raw performance. The core crisis exposed is the lack of a legal property rights framework for AI "intelligence." While companies invest heavily in integrating these models into their production systems, legally they only purchase a service that can be revoked at any time, leaving them with no recourse for their sunk investments. The conclusion warns of a permanently fractured digital world where the most capable models may not be the most usable, and clear, unassailable ownership of technology will become paramount.

marsbit6 хв тому

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

marsbit6 хв тому

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

On June 12, leading crypto data and capital markets platform Blockworks announced its acquisition of competitor Messari for over $10 million. This price represents a significant discount from Messari's 2022 valuation peak of approximately $300 million, highlighting the survival pressures faced by high-valuation startups during the bear market and a consolidation wave in data infrastructure. Blockworks, founded in 2018, began as a media and events company but has pivoted to focus on institutional-grade data, investor relations, and compliance tools. Its recent Series A extension round, valuing the company at $192 million, aimed to fund this shift and strategic acquisitions like this one. Messari, also founded in 2018, grew as a go-to platform for professional crypto research and data, raising a $35 million Series B at its $300 million valuation in late 2022. However, the prolonged bear market and subsequent internal changes, including founder Ryan Selkis's departure in 2024, increased operational pressures. The acquisition integrates Messari's extensive data platform and API capabilities with Blockworks's strengths in issuer-side disclosure, investor relations, and compliance workflows. The combined entity aims to build a unified "system of record" for the on-chain market. This reflects a broader industry trend where high-quality, structured data is becoming critical for institutional adoption, AI agents, and creating data moats akin to traditional financial platforms like Bloomberg. The deal exemplifies how market consolidation is reshaping the fragmented crypto data landscape.

marsbit34 хв тому

From a $300 Million Valuation to a 'Fire Sale' at Tens of Millions: What Happened to Messari?

marsbit34 хв тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit1 год тому

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片